- USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

RE: [USR-TC] HiperArc configs
by RickL＠solunet.com 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

The ARC supports this; you can "add ip net" all day and assign the same interface (eth:1 or Eth:2). That's CommWorks version of secondary. Rick team Solunet -----Original Message----- From: Antonio Querubin [mailto:tony@lava.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:32 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] HiperArc configs On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Paul Farber wrote: > Like the 'secondary' command on the cisco or IP aliasing in UNIX? Yeah kind of like IP aliasing. I don't see anything like it in the ARC CLI but maybe I'm just looking in the wrong place. If one tries to force another ip address onto the same interface, even when it's a different subnet from the one already configured, the CLI complains about invalid argument. So either it's simply not allowed or some other command configures a alias addresses. _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

10 Mbps half duplex
by Richard Roy 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

I would like to find a way to configure a port to 10 Mbps Full Duplex on hiperarc. I have a switch (Cisco Catalyst) that is capable of doing 10 Mbps half/full. It will be too costly to replace all my cards to support 10/100. When I set the switch port to 10 Mbps Full, the hiperarc default to 10 Mbps half because of autosensing logic. This create alignment errors... So far, I am using up to 7 DSP per 10 Mbps half duplex connection. I see up to 4% collision rate. I am trying to get a better "Internet experience" out of my testing. It will be "really" nice to have a manual speed & duplex setting. Because we use this interface like a "trunk", even at 100 Mbps autosensing I will prefer to see a manual setting. I spoke to CommWorks and they want my company to pay for it because I'm the only customer requesting it. In a nutshell, I would like to hear from you the following: - Is there a way to assign 10 Mbps full duplex if the switch is only 10 Mbps half/full? - If you are using a 10 Mbps half duplex, what is your maximum number of hiperDSP assigned to this conection? - Would you consider "important" to have a manual speed and duplex setting on hiperarc? Thank you for your time. Richard Roy _________________________________________________________________ Internet access plans that fit your lifestyle -- join MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp

1 0

Re: [USR-TC] 10 Mbps half duplex
by Richard Roy 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

Hi, CommWorks told us it was "technically" possible to have manual speed and duplex feature on the hiperarc. One price I heard is $60 K to it. I understand 10 Mbps Full may not make sense from a 10/100 infrastructure perpective but for us, it makes a lot of sense. Another potential problem is if the hiperarc can't support 10 Mbps Full even when it is manually set. Richard Roy >From: "David A. Allen" <network-lists(a)gwi.net> >Reply-To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com >To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com >Subject: Re: [USR-TC] 10 Mbps half duplex Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:00:05 >-0500 (EST) > > >Cc: Commworks, Solunet > >Richard, > >We are dealing with a similar issue. We're using an HP switch, 10/100. We >would like to hard-code to 100FDx, for the obvious reason that auto-detect >is >almost completely unreliable. Commworks repeated that dialogue verbatim. > >"We will need you to pay for it as you are the only customer requesting >this." > >I find it rather interesting that we were told that a Cisco Catalyst (or >most >any switch other than HP) would not exhibit the auto-negotiation problems. > >I will, however, give credit to Commworks for recognizing the issue after a >time. They have, in fact, agreed to "determine what needs to happen to put >manual overrides in place" without compensation. Beyond this they will not >guarantee that the efforts they put forth towards resolving the issue are >free >of charge. > >If you (or anyone for that matter) are interested in the ongoing progress >of >this issue, please contact me privately. > > >David A. Allen >Manager, Network Department >Great Works Internet > > >On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Richard Roy wrote: > > > I would like to find a way to configure a port to 10 Mbps Full Duplex on > > hiperarc. I have a switch (Cisco Catalyst) that is capable of doing 10 >Mbps > > half/full. It will be too costly to replace all my cards to support >10/100. > > When I set the switch port to 10 Mbps Full, the hiperarc default to 10 >Mbps > > half because of autosensing logic. This create alignment errors... > > > > So far, I am using up to 7 DSP per 10 Mbps half duplex connection. I see >up > > to 4% collision rate. I am trying to get a better "Internet experience" >out > > of my testing. > > > > It will be "really" nice to have a manual speed & duplex setting. >Because we > > use this interface like a "trunk", even at 100 Mbps autosensing I will > > prefer to see a manual setting. > > > > I spoke to CommWorks and they want my company to pay for it because I'm >the > > only customer requesting it. > > > > In a nutshell, I would like to hear from you the following: > > - Is there a way to assign 10 Mbps full duplex if the switch is only 10 >Mbps > > half/full? > > - If you are using a 10 Mbps half duplex, what is your maximum number of > > hiperDSP assigned to this conection? > > - Would you consider "important" to have a manual speed and duplex >setting > > on hiperarc? > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >USR-TC mailing list >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _________________________________________________________________ Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] Modem Help - Smartlink 56PSV
by Joel - Fox Computers 29 Oct '02

29 Oct '02

If it came in an e-machine, it was probably some OEM product made only for e-machine and Smartlink doesn't support - should be able to get a driver from e-machines web site. Are you sure it came in the machine? Per their web-site looks like only use 4 different modems - MW560CI-(1338), MA560CI-(1447), MR560LPM-(1446), and MM8100SW-(232). http://www.emachines.com/support/drivers.html -----Original Message----- From: Support [mailto:support@inet2000.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:04 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] Modem Help - Smartlink 56PSV Hi. Maybe a bit off topic, but I'm sure someone will let me know if I am. :-) My customer has a modem listed on the chipset as SmartLink SL1800 and XHBN9400000B, neither of which Altavista finds. On the back of the modem it says 56PSV-A-W, which again goves no hits. This is in an E-Machine and it lists "V.92 ready" on the front sticker. Any help would be appreciated finding drivers, info, etc. - Todd _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

3 2

RE: [USR-TC] HiperArc configs
by Joel - Fox Computers 29 Oct '02

29 Oct '02

Same here - my 2nd port is on my internal network - Run my Radius on the Internal network only. Word of caution: When doing this, you should be aware that your Dial-up users have access to your internal network, so you still have to make sure everything on your network is relatively secure. Because the ARC is a router, it routes between different subnets, particularly between the one for your dial-up users and your internal network. For example: if my internal network is 192.168.1.x, and I have a web site for internal use configured on 192.168.1.10, any dial-up user, regardless of their IP address, can get to 192.168.1.10 just by typing that address into their browser. Probably a way to prevent this, but by default this is the case. - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Lewis Bergman [mailto:lbergman@wtxs.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:30 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] HiperArc configs > Speaking of 2nd ethernet port, I was wondering what are people using that > 2'nd port for? Does it need to be in a separate subnet from the other > port? I have my second port configured for my private ip space, I have a single user configured for this so that your assigned a static private ip. This way I can get into my server remotely but use tools I might not want to be routable over the internet or do other tasks on my private lan. I also use the private lan to do all radius stuff and snmp and so forth so it isn't on the same network as my customers traffic. -- Lewis Bergman Texas Communications 4309 Maple St. Abilene, TX 79602-8044 915-695-6962 ext 115 _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] Configuring dialout from a Netserver Card
by RickL＠solunet.com 28 Oct '02

28 Oct '02

I don't THINK a contract is required to read, but try the documentation library at totalservice.commworks.com Rick Team Solunet -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Ndegwa [mailto:pndegwa@ke.uu.net] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:42 AM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] Configuring dialout from a Netserver Card Hi there. I have some 3Com Netserver cards (code ver 3.8.1) running from a 3Com Chassis. I want to configure dialout access using a virtual telnet port. I have been able to implement this with the Hiper ARC card successfully. Can anyone give me some pointers on how to do it on the Netserver card ? I would even appreciate RTMF resources :-). Kind Regards, Patrick Ndegwa, _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

Configuring dialout from a Netserver Card
by Patrick Ndegwa 28 Oct '02

28 Oct '02

Hi there. I have some 3Com Netserver cards (code ver 3.8.1) running from a 3Com Chassis. I want to configure dialout access using a virtual telnet port. I have been able to implement this with the Hiper ARC card successfully. Can anyone give me some pointers on how to do it on the Netserver card ? I would even appreciate RTMF resources :-). Kind Regards, Patrick Ndegwa,

1 0

Older ARC Upgrade problem
by Paul Farber 27 Oct '02

27 Oct '02

I've recently gotten a hold of and older chassis and the console port (after booting) shows the bootloader version, then "Kernel Loading.. OK" then it stops. I tried to download 4.1.59 to it via the console port and it seemed to work (by using the AT{ZF} command after the bootloader prompt) and it formatted the flash, uncompressed some files and rebooted... right back to the "Kernel Loading... OK" prompt. Dip switched 1,2 are on and the rest are off. This originally had 2x 48VDC PSA/PSUs but since I don't have that voltage available at my office I took them out and put in a single 70A 120VAC PS with only the NMC, ARC and 2 DSPs.... could the different PS have anything to do with it? Any ideas??? -- Paul Farber Farber Technology farber(a)admin.f-tech.net Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545

2 2

TroubleShooting HiperDSP
by Kris McElroy 25 Oct '02

25 Oct '02

I just bought some Hiper DSP Card sets. They are Hardware version 0.54.0 and software code 3.1.7. I have 3 cards do the same thing. I will have about 10 to 15 users online and it will just drop them. I then can open up Total Control Manager and see the DSP is Yellow. I do a restore to service and it works, for a while and will do the same thing. Can someone help me out with this? Thanks, Kris McElroy kmcelroy(a)duracom.net Internet Systems Engineer Duracom, INC. www.duracom.net

3 4

RE: [USR-TC] V.92 / MOH
by Joel - Fox Computers 25 Oct '02

25 Oct '02

My experience with placing a call in the iblitzz software: you click "Place a call" and nothing happens. But the next time a call comes in, the "Place Call" window comes up instead of the "Incoming Call". Real pain. - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Support [mailto:support@inet2000.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:39 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] V.92 / MOH No, we haven't. We hadn't really tested it, since it requires 3-way calling on the phone line and we didn't have it. One of our customers got the feature installed and informed us that it didn't work. We're not too concerned about outgoing MOH applications, since most people can schedule around their own calls. It's the incoming calls that we're more concerned with and getting them operating properly. We've had modems that have MOH applications that work OK, but the supply of them is iffy. Currently, we can't get iBlitzz's here in Canada again. We're getting the PhobeMicro ones, which also contain a Lucent chipset and work OK, but we're not thrilled with them. We had ONE Intel / Ambient modem with the Hardware Accelerator (HAM) chipset and it worked BRILLIANTLY! An 8 second negotiation and great speed - by far the fastest we'd tested. We ordered a whackload of more Intel modems, but now they are the 'new and improved' chipset that does 16 second connections and a crappy MOH - Call Manager software. I mean, a call Manager that doesn't show caller ID and has to stay open on the clients desktop is simply not acceptable. Plus, Archtek says "it's Intel's software - call them" and Intel says "we just design chipset's - call your modem manufacturer" so they get A+'s for passing the buck. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel - Fox Computers" <jfox(a)foxcomputers.com> To: <usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:20 PM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] V.92 / MOH Todd, Have you been able to make outgoing calls with the iblitzz MOH app? Can't get it to work. Any suggestions? - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Support [mailto:support@inet2000.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:56 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] V.92 / MOH Does anyone know of a 3rd Party MOH application for V.92 modems? The ones that come with the various modems are just to inconsistent and at least the ones we've seen, unprofessional. Either there's no caller ID and the application stays on the desktop all the time, or it doesn't support making outgoing calls, or it doesn't make a 'ring' sound or it has 50 clicks in the exact right sequence or something is messed up on nearly everyone we've seen. So, does someone have a good recommendation or know of a stand-alone, 3rd party product for MOH? Thank you. Todd Chamberlain _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

2 2