I've been experimenting with running Virtual PC 4.3 under XP
to find out whether or not I'd be able to make full use of my
Pentium4 2 GHz/512 MB RAM machine to accelerate Fractint fractal
calculations.
Having applied the makefcfg utility to sort out possible VESA
problems with my NVidia GeForce4 MX 460 graphics card, I have been
able to generate the following resolutions for Fractint (running under
DOS under Virtual PC under Windows XP):
640x400x256
640x480x256
800x600x256
1024x768x256
1280x1024x256
With lower or higher resolutions (specified by makefcfg in my
fractint.cfg),
Virtual PC hung up.
I also managed to generate the above resolutions for true colour modes.
So, yes, as far as video modes are concerned Virtual PC might be a way to
work around the XP limitations.
But, there is a but - at least for me. Even calculations of 640x480x256
fractals turned out to be considerably slower than on my Pentium III 700
and 800 MHz PCs. Maybe, there is a way to reconfigure DOS under
Virtual PC. I have applied old autoexec.bat and config.sys values from way
back when I was really still using DOS, but could not achieve any
signficant accelerations.
That's why I have given up on trying to run the current Fractint DOS
version
under XP on my 2 GHz machine.
I've decided to wait and hope and pray for the Windows version. Otherwise
I'm fine with Fractint on my other PCs (running Windows 98 and ME).
Hans-Joachim
PS: Something else comes to mind while reporting these experiences with
Virtual PC. Has anyone ever tried VMware Workstation? Since it is a
virtual machine software letting you run multiple operating systems (like,
for instance, Windows and Linux) on a single piece of hardware, maybe
it is more useful for running Fractint on modern machines than Virtual PC
is.