- USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

Total control chassis
by Gerald 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

My company has reduced the amount of dialup equipment that we need and we have 4 Total Control units we are not planning on using again. Please e-mail me if you have a need or desire for a TC unit. We've kept all of the Hiper DSP's out of them for obvious reasons, but I'll give you more details if you are interested. We are not looking to make a profit off of these TC's just offload them to someone else. I'll give more details about them to anyone interested. Thanks, Gerald

3 3

FS: TC1000 DS3 MultiSpan Bundle
by Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Available in Stock. TC1000 w/ Dual 130A AC 1- 333NMC 2- Hiper ARC 3- MultiSpan 96 1- Ingres DS3 $15,000 or BO $13,000 with standard Hiper NMC ********************************************************************* Steve Rivera IM: srivera711 (877)WRCANET x102 for more product info got www.wrca.net WRCA , Inc. - 481 Wright Debow Rd. Jackson, NJ 08527

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] TC1000 looking for a consultant (small ISP in VT)
by Joel - Fox Computers 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Thanks Matthew! My contact info for anyone who may be interested: Joel Fox Fox Computer Service, Inc. Fox Technology Solutions, Inc. iNetCi Internet 712-792-8990 888-659-6923 -----Original Message----- From: matthew(a)the-spa.com [mailto:matthew@the-spa.com] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 11:30 AM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] TC1000 looking for a consultant (small ISP in VT) contact joel fox from fox computers, he is on this list. he has helped us a bunch of times. matthew ---- Original Message ---- From: dcovell(a)vtlink.net To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] TC1000 looking for a consultant (small ISP in VT) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:19:20 -0400 > >Hello, >We recently replaced our TC1000 with a newer model. The goal to >upgrade so >we can offer V.92 and perhaps to eliminate some hardware failure >trends that >we were seeing on the old box. > >Now that the newer chassis is installed we are seeing connection >success >rate falling and are not understanding the V.92 modem process. Our >techs >have reached their limits. We suspect that the box is trying to >fullfil >V.92 requests but something is wrong in our configuration and causing >that >V.92 attempt to degrade the users experience (slower connection) then >when >we only offered V.90... > >Small Rural VT ISP > >Is there an experienced user on this list that can be contracted for >remote >review of our configuration and perhaps optimising/troubleshooting >our Total >Control? > >Naturally we would need a few references before we 'open the door' on >a >remote connection. > >Thank you, >David Covell >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com) >Version: 6.0.470 / Virus Database: 268 - Release Date: 4/8/2003 > > >_______________________________________________ >USR-TC mailing list >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

FW: [USR-TC] TC/RADIUS performance
by BSmith＠solunet.com 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

-----Original Message----- From: David Hamilton Subject: Re: [USR-TC] TC/RADIUS performance What's smokeping? _______________________________________________ http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/smokeping/ ~Brian

1 0

TC/RADIUS performance
by Paul Farber 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Have a radius performance question. On April 16th my primary radius server (800Mhz, 256Mb RAM, Linux 2.4.20, ICRADIUS + MySQL, 1600 users) authenticated 2930 radius requests. It is also a local DNS resolver for all dial ins running djbdns. My backup RADIUS server (1.6Ghz, 256Mb RAM, Linux 2.4.20 ICRADIUS + MySQL 1600 users) caught 284 authentications. I have 3 HiperARC set up to authenticate off these servers with a timeout of 3 seconds and 10 retries. If 284 requests had to fail over to the secondary radius server that means that I had (3 x 10 x 284) 8520 seconds of primary RADIUS server being unavailable????? Thats 142 minutes or over two hours?!!?!?!?!?! With over 9% of the total requests having to go to the secondary?!?!?!?! Even if the ARC switched to the secondary after the first 3 second timeout thats (3x1x284) 852 seconds or over 14 minutes of primary auth server unavailibility?!?!?!?! ?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!? How long will the the ARC retry the primary auth server??? The config says 10 times 3 seconds. But if I do the simple math then I had over two hours of downtime. I don't belive that or I am missing something. The primary radius server is on the same network as 1 ARC, the other two are routed from two other local LAN segments. The Secondary is 3 hops away. What am I missing??? -- Paul Farber Farber Technology farber(a)admin.f-tech.net Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545

4 5

TC1000 looking for a consultant (small ISP in VT)
by David Covell 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Hello, We recently replaced our TC1000 with a newer model. The goal to upgrade so we can offer V.92 and perhaps to eliminate some hardware failure trends that we were seeing on the old box. Now that the newer chassis is installed we are seeing connection success rate falling and are not understanding the V.92 modem process. Our techs have reached their limits. We suspect that the box is trying to fullfil V.92 requests but something is wrong in our configuration and causing that V.92 attempt to degrade the users experience (slower connection) then when we only offered V.90... Small Rural VT ISP Is there an experienced user on this list that can be contracted for remote review of our configuration and perhaps optimising/troubleshooting our Total Control? Naturally we would need a few references before we 'open the door' on a remote connection. Thank you, David Covell --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com) Version: 6.0.470 / Virus Database: 268 - Release Date: 4/8/2003

1 0

Total Control Chassis
by sky1 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Have 15 left of the fully populated chassis. $2750.00 each All configured as follows: (14) Hiper DSP card sets (2) Hiper ARC 128 Mb version (1) Hiper NMC (2) 130 Amp AC power supplies (1) Blue labeled chassis w/ integrated fan assembly --Excellent condition, Six (6) Month warranty.....$2750.00 each If you need 'em, let me know. Thanks, Shannan Young SouthWest Data Technology, Inc. 972-739-7010 972-739-7013 (Fax) sky1(a)airmail.net www.swdt.com

1 0

Monitor ethernet bandwidth on hiperarc with MRTG?
by Giovanni Navarrette 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

Hi everyone - I've got a question that I'm guessing has been answered, but I haven't been able to find in the archives or on the net. Maybe someone can point me in the right direction... Does anyone know the MIB for monitoring bandwidth on the eth:1 interface for a hiperarc? The closest one I've found is 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.16.3, which is "the total number of octets trasmitted out the given interface, including framing characters". Not exactly what I'm looking for. If I poll that I get the number of octets its outout, but when I monitor the hiperarc with a program like Solarwinds's Bandwidth Monitor, I get the in/out kbits per sec usage. Thats what I'd like to get on an MRTG page... Do I need to writeup a script that would poll it once a second, 2 times, subtract the 2 figures to get the difference (which would be number of octets in that one second), then that would be my bytes per second transferred outbound and use that? Thanks for ya time, have a g'day. - ------------------------------------------ Giovanni Navarrette USLink Internet Systems Administrator e-Mail: gio(a)uslink.net

4 4

calls question
by alex＠wanex.ge 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

How many DSP cards/calls can handle a single HARC(128Mb RAM 16Mb Flash with TCS 4.5/4.7)?

1 0

ARC interface question
by alex＠wanex.ge 21 Apr '03

21 Apr '03

What can be reason for modem interface (for example slot:1/mod:1) being OperStatus down? This port's timeslot shows that its in ds0ReceivingBlock state.

1 0