Doesn't PRI have some advantages for error checking, etc. Basically it's
easier to trace down and correct line noise problems, signal bounces, etc.
than a channelized T1?
- mike
----------
>From: "Mike McHenry" <mmchen(a)minn.net>
>To: <usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com>
>Subject: RE: (usr-tc) Channelized T1 vs PRI
>Date: Wed, Sep 22, 1999, 12:04 PM
>
>You should be able to busy out channels just like you did before with a CT1.
>CT1s also support ANI if configured that way from the telco. The only
>functionality I figure you will lose is the ability to take incoming 64k
>clear channel ISDN calls on your Total Control chassis.
>
>Mike McHenry
> Systems Administrator
> MinnNet Communications, Inc.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com
>[mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Stainforth, Matthew
>Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 1:49 PM
>To: 'usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com'
>Subject: RE: (usr-tc) Channelized T1 vs PRI
>
>
>
>Part of the reason we're doing this is because CT1 is cheaper but I've never
>used CT1 before and I'm wondering what other functionality we're going to
>lose. I gather it will no longer be possible to do busy out the channels
>from this end and we'll also probably lose ANI too. Are there any other
>drawbacks that I might be overlooking?
>
>On Wednesday, September 22, 1999 3:46 PM, Mike McHenry
>[SMTP:mmchen@minn.net] wrote:
>> You should be able to use the same code for either a PRI or a channelized
>T1
>> on the DSP, just go into the TCM, select the T1 portion of the DSP (top
>LED
>> below the power LED), click Configure-->Programmed Settings-->Trunk
>Settings
>>
>> You will see a setting called signal mode, it should be set to robbed bit
>> for a channelized T1 and message oriented for a PRI. Unless the telco is
>> changing other things (ie switch type, etc) that should be the only
>setting
>> you need to change when the telco changes your PRI to a channelized T1.
>>
>> Mike McHenry
>> Systems Administrator
>> MinnNet Communications, Inc.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com
>> [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Stainforth, Matthew
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 1:29 PM
>> To: 'usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com'
>> Subject: (usr-tc) Channelized T1 vs PRI
>>
>>
>>
>> Overnight tonight the telco is changing one of our T1s to channelized T1
>> from PRI service for testing. I seem to remember that there is different
>> code for the dual T1/PRI cards depending on which service you have but I'm
>> using all DSPs now and I can't seem to have any CT1 specific code for
>these
>> cards on TotalService. Does the one code base now support both CT1 and
>PRI
>> or am I missing something?
>>
>> Thanks...
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com"
>> with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message.
>> For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
>> "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com"
>> with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message.
>> For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
>> "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
>
>
>
>-
> To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com"
> with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message.
> For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
> "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
>
>
>-
> To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com"
> with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message.
> For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
> "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
>
-
To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com"
with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message.
For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.