February 2002 - USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

MultiSpan Cards
by Jim Greene 07 Feb '02

07 Feb '02

Has anyone used the multispan cards yet ? How many can you get per chassis ? per ARC ? Jim G

1 0

BUYING: USR Dual E1/PRI card sets
by Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net 07 Feb '02

07 Feb '02

I need 10 in a bad way. Can anyone help me out? Paying more than you would expect in todays USR market. QTY -10 USR Dual T1/E1 000397-00 E1 Dual PRI Card set Overseas sellers ok. I pay freight in most cases :) Please forward availability to srivera(a)wrca.net Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 IM: srivera711 732-833-2115 fax for more product info got www.wrca.net Jackson, NJ 08527 (USA)

1 0

User forums back up at Commworks
by Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net 07 Feb '02

07 Feb '02

While I am searching for my dual e1/pri card sets, I noticed that they redid the user forum on the commworks page. Thought you'd like to know. http://userforums.commworks.com/index.cfm?frmid=1&tpcid=1 Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 IM: srivera711 732-833-2115 fax for more product info got www.wrca.net Jackson, NJ 08527 (USA)

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] Forcing a default route for customer through radius
by Brian Becker 06 Feb '02

06 Feb '02

No actually I'm trying to make our FamilySafeInternet service work locally. It is working fine at each of our locations because the gateway router tunnels over to the R2000/Xstop filter. But locally on our main pop we can't do that since that causes a loop (gateway router sends traffic over to R2000 which requests a web page for that users IP which goes to the gateway router and the cycle starts all over again). Normal dialup customers use the default route: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 gateway 216.41.128.1 Family Safe Customers need to use a different default route: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 gateway 216.41.128.24 I was thinking that you could send a gateway to the arc for by Radius. Brian Brian Becker President, Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. P.O. Box 190 | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | 573.686.9114 Home of http://semo.net - Southeast Missouri's Online Community http://TotallyFabricated.com Total Scrutinizer - Tech Support Just Got Easier WebGabber - All-html Web Chat Software -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin(a)mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Ed Taylor Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:10 AM To: usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] Forcing a default route for customer through radius Brain, Are you trying to redirect them to a certain Website or something so that if they are late on a Bill they will see that page only? Because I am not sure what has been stated will do that. What would really be nice is to push a Popup to the customer... Something to make a box popup when the customer logs in and then again every so often. Once the account becomes more seriously overdue limit their surfing and still have the popup. -- Edgar D. Taylor President/CEO FIRST USA Inc. Voice: (800)716-6190 Email: ed(a)1st.net Web: www.1st.net -- -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin(a)mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Brian Becker Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:00 PM To: usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] Forcing a default route for customer through radius I was hoping to do it by Radius though. Isn't there a way to do it by framed-route or something like that? Brian Becker President, Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. http://semo.net P.O. Box 190 | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | 573.686.9114 -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin(a)mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Mcadams Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:03 PM To: usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] Forcing a default route for customer through radius Also sprach Brian Becker >Is there an attribute to force a default route other than the normal >via radius for a particular customer? Check into the Internet Equal Access (IEA) feature. Basically let's you set up per-user default routes. I've not used this feature personally, so I don't know how much help I can be on configuration issues, but I know that's what it does. :) Another option might be to configure the customer as a tunnel user and tunnel them to wherever you need to get their traffic, though there are, obviously, some complications from that. -- Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm(a)iglou.com Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456 _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

2 1

how do you mirror a hiperDSP configuration?
by Jeff Garvas 06 Feb '02

06 Feb '02

For those of you saw my previous post, thanks for the help. I figured out that my NMC didn't have an IP assigned to it, but the ARC did. Here is my dilema... I'm trying to accomplish two things. I had six hiperDSP cards in the chassis and I just added a seventh. I'm having a hard time figuring out why this card refuses to sync with the PRI. Is there an easy way to take the configuration from one or all of the existing hiperDSP cards and mirror it on to the seventh card? Second, now that I have the TCM working, how can I change the IP address of the ARC? The TC is in IP space I need to renumber out of ASAP, which is my biggest dilema. If there is a command line option to renumber it that might work easier I'd opt for that, but I am under the impression it's easier to accomplish this through the TCM. Thanks in advance. -Jeff Garvas

2 1

UST TC1000 and 'Level 3 alarm'
by Steve Johnson 05 Feb '02

05 Feb '02

This morning one of my pops running TC1000 with HyperArc V5.09 NMC V7.1.8 and DSP V2.1.85 started returning all circuits are busy errors. I called the CO and they told me 3 of my PRIs are returning a 'Level 3 failure alarm' After reseting the cards and waiting for the 5E switch on their end to see that I did that (took about 3 minutes) the cards came back, the alarm was gone and the all circuits are busy error went away. Now I know I wasn't full up to capacity because this is a new pop with 299 lines, and there are only about 16 people testing it for me right now. My question is, anyone know what causes this? Thanks -Steve

3 3

Forcing a default route for customer through radius
by Brian Becker 05 Feb '02

05 Feb '02

Is there an attribute to force a default route other than the normal via radius for a particular customer? Brian Becker President, Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. P.O. Box 190 | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | 573.686.9114 Home of http://semo.net - Southeast Missouri's Online Community http://TotallyFabricated.com Total Scrutinizer - Tech Support Just Got Easier WebGabber - All-html Web Chat Software

2 1

WTB: USR Total Control / FS: USR/3Com Total Control
by Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net 04 Feb '02

04 Feb '02

Immediate buyer for: 5+ Fan trays for classic chassis (must have its own power cord) 5+ Dual T1/E1 NAC's (Not dual PRI) 10+ Dual E1 NIC's (Not T1 or DS1) WTS: Hiper DSP $1050 Hiper ARC $1500 (128MB) EdgeServer with SCSI nic $750 Always WTB: Hiper NMC's. 2- 70A DC power sets(New in Box) $325 10+ 70A power sets $275 1- 130A DC power Set $375 3- 130A PSI DC $100 1- 130A PSI AC $100 15+ NMC v90 $450 20+ Dual PRI $200 5+ Dual T1/E1 $200 30+ Netserver PRI $250 100+ Quad Digital Modem $35 45A Fan Tray w/ power cord $150 High Density Integrated Fan Tray $175 High Density Chassis, no power $100 Quad Fan Out Cables $25ea I will work for bundle deals....Just give me a shot at it. Total Control Hiper Chassis - Blue Label (1) 70 Amp Power Supply (1) Hiper ARC (2) Hiper DSP (1) NMC 16MB (1) Integrated Fan Tray Asking$ 3500.00 Total Control Hiper Chassis - Blue Label (1) 130 Amp Power Supply (1) Hiper ARC (2) Hiper DSP (1) NMC 16MB (1) Integrated Fan Tray Asking$ 4000.00 Total control v.90 (1)70 Amp Power Supply (1) V.90 enabled NMC (12)Digital,Quads v.90 Modems (1)Netserver Pri card (1)Dual Pri T1/E1 (1)Integrated Fan Tray Asking $1500.00 Total control Analog/Digital chassis (1)70 Amp AC Power supply (1)NMC card (12)Digital Quad modems (1)Netserver Pri card (1)Dual Pri (1)Intergrated Fan Tray Asking $1000 15- MP 16 v34 $300 ...will beat almost any price on these :) 3- MP 8 v34 $300 2- MP16-I $550 2- Netserver 8 v34 $450 3- Netserver 8-I $550 2- Netserver 8-I Plus $650 1- Netserver 16I $800 Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 IM: srivera711 732-833-2115 fax for more product info got www.wrca.net Jackson, NJ 08527 (USA)

1 0

IP compression problem on TC1000
by Scot Desort 03 Feb '02

03 Feb '02

We have had a problem start to crop up with ISDN customers using Netopia ISDN routers. We have been using ISDN routers for years, and have not updated any code or settings on our TC in over a year. Our HARC code is 4.1.59. Basically, we had customers using Netopia ISDN calling in telling us they cannot get their router to connect. When we 'mon ppp' during the connection, there is some sort of battle going on between the Netopia and the TC over compression. There is a stream of COMPRESSION_TYPE REQ and NAKS going back and forth. We then went into the Netopia and changed the compression method back and forth between Ascend and Stac, with no definitive conclusion. Usually after 2 or 3 power cycles, the router does connect. And sometimes after it connects and has been online for a while, it simply stops passing regular IP traffic (you can still ping it and telnet into it). I called Netopia, and after they talked to their engineers, I got this email: "I don't have the specifics regarding the Total Control compression issues. What I have found out is that the Netopia, if it is set for one type of compression, will not try a different compression, even if the NACK request from the upstream device requests a different type of compression. So, if your 3COM Access Server is set to only accept Ascend Compression, set the Netopia for Ascend Compression." I was wondering if anyone here has come across this issue. How do I verify what compression settings the TC has? Is there some setting that is forcing the TC to ONLY attempt a single compression type? Maybe someone here has found a solution for this. The Netopia routers in question are running firmware 4.8.2 - Netopia says updating the firmware does not appear to resolve this issue on their end. TIA, Scot

3 2

RE: [USR-TC] NAT
by DPascarella＠solunet.com 01 Feb '02

01 Feb '02

Here is the link to the info you need. It's too extensive to list here. http://knowledgebase.3com.com/division/publisher.asp?id=2.0.65316888.3117034 &resource=&number=0&type=CONTEXTID -----Original Message----- From: Kancha . [mailto:kancha2np@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:06 AM To: usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] NAT I've a TC1000 with HiperArc version 5.1.6. The TC has two E1 dsp cards. Currently I've public IP in the ip-pool. I want to give private ip to my dial-up usersand do NAT. How can i achieve this in Total Control ?? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0