- KLF - mailman.xmission.com

Re: Bad Wisdom republished (non-HTML!)
by John Milne 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

>> Here's the latest list of things I have for sale, all the movies are 100% hardcore uncut XXX Is "Bad Wisdom" being made into a film, then? ;-) John Not Scots, just Scottish PS - I notice the "Eternity Project One" CD just went on e-bay for £132. Surely even JAMSCD4 doesn't go for that amount, does it? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2508836781

1 0

Re: Bad Wisdom republished
by John Milne 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

>> Here's the latest list of things I have for sale, all the movies are 100% hardcore uncut XXX Is "Bad Wisdom" being made into a film, then? ;-) John Not Scots, just Scottish PS - I notice the "Eternity Project One" CD just went on e-bay for £132. Surely even JAMSCD4 doesn't go for that amount, does it? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2508836781

1 0

Eternity Project One CD
by Drazen Kusic 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

Look at this: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=9991&item=2508836781… Still about 30 mins to bid on that. 127 pounds at the moment. Dex My name is Dex and they call me Sky Riding the waves with out heads held high We came from Atlantis on a burning shell with our 808 program to sell. -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

1 0

Re: [KLF] Bad Wisdom republished?
by TheMgnt＠aol.com 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

> says that the proof copy of Bad Wisdom they have is going to be > published again in April.. does this mean the old one was deleted (e.g. > not in print for the time being)? It's been out of print for years now, hasn't it? Anyway, a quick check on Amazon.com shows it is indeed being republished in April by Creation Books. I wonder if it's expanded or anything? Actually it just occured to me - it was never published in the US prior to this. -paul Currently in rotation: Bongos Bass and Bob - Never Mind the Sex Pistols, Here's...; Pet Shop Boys - Release / Disco 3; Sparks - Lil Beethoven

3 3

Re: [KLF] [OT] Lightbulbs
by Drazen Kusic 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

The right answer is 1697 !!!!!!!!! 5 demands that the lightbulb must be put in the brackets, so they may have put lightbulb in filter. Dex From: "Thomas Touzimsky" <thomas(a)klf.de> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:25:31 +0100 To: "KLF Mailing List" <klf(a)mailman.xmission.com> Subject: [KLF] [OT] Lightbulbs Message-Id: <000901c2dcc8$fd975b00$ac95fea9@THOMAS> Re: Q. How many mailing list members do you need to change a lightbulb ? Re: A. 1692 (!) Re: Re: 1 who changes the lightbulb and sends a mail to the list telling them that Re: it has been changed. Re: 14 who made similar experiences and reply how to change the bulb much Re: better. Re: 7 pointing out the risks of changing lightbulbs. Re: 27 pointing out grammar and spelling mistakes made in the previous lightbulb Re: mails. Re: 53 flaming the previous 27. Re: 156 writing a mail to the list admin, complaining about the lightbulb mails Re: that should be banned from the list. Re: 41 correcting the 53 flamers. Re: 109 writing to the list that it is not a lightbulb list, and further Re: discussion should be made in alt.lite.bulb Re: 203 asking for to stop crosspostings to alt.grammar, alt.spelling and Re: alt.punktation Re: 111 defending the mail, pointing out that everyone uses lightbulbs what Re: makes them on-topic again Re: 306 debating about which changing method is the best, where to find the best Re: lightbulbs, what kind of lightbulbs are the best and which brands are crap. Re: 27 posting URLs for pages where to find images of lightbulbs. Re: 14 replying that those URLs are wrong, sending the right ones in exchange. Re: 3 mailing links they found following those URLs that are relevant for the Re: list, proving that lightbulbs are important for the list as well. Re: 33 gathering all mails in one post, quote them completely (including header Re: and footer) only to add "Me too" at the bottom. Re: 12 announcing they will quit the list because they can't stand this Re: lightbulb discussion anymore. Re: 19 quoting the "Me too"s, adding "Me three". Re: 4 suggesting the posters should read the lightbulb faq. Re: 1 suggesting to create the newsgroup alt.change.light.bulb Re: 47 pointing out that alt.physic.cold_fusion is the right newsgroup for this Re: topic Re: 143 posting that creating that newsgroup is a good idea. Re: 27 sending "unsubscribe" to the list, not understanding that they should Re: send their mail to the list server rather than the whole list. Re: 42 mailing useless pictures of all kinds of bulbs to the list. Re: 78 complaining about that. Re: 1 having problems reading all the picture mails because of his lousy modem / Re: harddisc / computer. Re: 1 suggesting a live irc chat in #bulbs, giving up after one week of waiting Re: for response. Re: 5 suggesting an own mailing list for the never ending "lightbulb" topic. Re: 35 giving their ok (on list of course). Re: 126 being against it, letting everyone on the list know about that. Re: Re: And 1 mailing that in his humble opinion the lightbulb had not to be changed Re: at all... Re: Re: Re: --- Re: Thomas Touzimsky Re: Re: "Some millennia, you should better stay in bed." My name is Dex and they call me Sky Riding the waves with out heads held high We came from Atlantis on a burning shell with our 808 program to sell. -- __________________________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

1 0

Re: Bad Wisdom republished
by John Milne 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

>> does this mean the old one was deleted Here's the link to Amazon: http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/184068108X/ref=pd_sim_b_dp/026-3551 710-2614048 Funny. The original had a quote from Jarvis Cocker on the front. Now, it's Iain Sinclair. Ah ... those hazy Britpop days of '96 ... John Not Scots, just Scott-ish

2 1

[OT] Lightbulbs
by Thomas Touzimsky 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

Somehow this reminded me of the bracket flaming and the likes... don't know why... :-) --- Q. How many mailing list members do you need to change a lightbulb ? A. 1692 (!) 1 who changes the lightbulb and sends a mail to the list telling them that it has been changed. 14 who made similar experiences and reply how to change the bulb much better. 7 pointing out the risks of changing lightbulbs. 27 pointing out grammar and spelling mistakes made in the previous lightbulb mails. 53 flaming the previous 27. 156 writing a mail to the list admin, complaining about the lightbulb mails that should be banned from the list. 41 correcting the 53 flamers. 109 writing to the list that it is not a lightbulb list, and further discussion should be made in alt.lite.bulb 203 asking for to stop crosspostings to alt.grammar, alt.spelling and alt.punktation 111 defending the mail, pointing out that everyone uses lightbulbs what makes them on-topic again 306 debating about which changing method is the best, where to find the best lightbulbs, what kind of lightbulbs are the best and which brands are crap. 27 posting URLs for pages where to find images of lightbulbs. 14 replying that those URLs are wrong, sending the right ones in exchange. 3 mailing links they found following those URLs that are relevant for the list, proving that lightbulbs are important for the list as well. 33 gathering all mails in one post, quote them completely (including header and footer) only to add "Me too" at the bottom. 12 announcing they will quit the list because they can't stand this lightbulb discussion anymore. 19 quoting the "Me too"s, adding "Me three". 4 suggesting the posters should read the lightbulb faq. 1 suggesting to create the newsgroup alt.change.light.bulb 47 pointing out that alt.physic.cold_fusion is the right newsgroup for this topic 143 posting that creating that newsgroup is a good idea. 27 sending "unsubscribe" to the list, not understanding that they should send their mail to the list server rather than the whole list. 42 mailing useless pictures of all kinds of bulbs to the list. 78 complaining about that. 1 having problems reading all the picture mails because of his lousy modem / harddisc / computer. 1 suggesting a live irc chat in #bulbs, giving up after one week of waiting for response. 5 suggesting an own mailing list for the never ending "lightbulb" topic. 35 giving their ok (on list of course). 126 being against it, letting everyone on the list know about that. And 1 mailing that in his humble opinion the lightbulb had not to be changed at all... --- Thomas Touzimsky "Some millennia, you should better stay in bed."

2 1

Bad Wisdom republished?
by Hawx 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

'ello. This here eBay auction http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3503320707&category=26… says that the proof copy of Bad Wisdom they have is going to be published again in April.. does this mean the old one was deleted (e.g. not in print for the time being)? Chris H

1 0

RE: [KLF] Re: Discuss. 500 words or less
by James Parker 25 Feb '03

25 Feb '03

Michael wrote: >Should any artist have this attitude? And should we respect it? Here are my musings on this one. In my humble opinion..... The KLF through their actions and their literary and historical references ; particularly R.A.Wilsons ideas on confusion, paranoia and celebrating life by living in the eternal present,and not the past or the future, could help understand some of Bill's current views. Life cannot be lived in the past, the groups music was a product of British music culture circa 1987-1992 and much has changed since. They may be still relevant to music now (particularly with the recylcing so prevalent today and the lack of new sounds) but they really belong to a time that has passed. I would think that some of Bill's iritation may be because he sees KLF fans as missing out on the now in favour of what was going on in 1990. Some obsessive fans could be missing out on a current band/trend/book/art-happening that are a KLF for today because of their gazing to the past. An artist is entitled to his/her attitude like any other person and if they don't want to talk about a topic we should respect that choice. Giving something out for public consumption is not a contract for a lifelong interrogation about it. James www.hankypankyparty.org.uk www.inukshuk.org.uk ------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail message and any attachment(s) are CONFIDENTIAL and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you should not read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information in this e-mail or any attachment(s). Please also e-mail, telephone or fax us immediately and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment, and we do not accept liability for any such corruption, interception or amendment or the consequences thereof. Please note that any views expressed in this email may be those of the originator and do not necessarily reflect those of this organisation. ----------------------------------------------------------- ____________________________________________ This OUTBOUND message from Frontline Limited has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service.

1 0

Star Trekkin (by The Firm) OFF TOPIC
by mark weston 24 Feb '03

24 Feb '03

Heres all the info you need.....Regards Mark http://home.wanadoo.nl/~sytze/sttrekkin/

3 3