- USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

Problems getting DSP's to "Answer"
by Carl Duescher 06 Jan '04

06 Jan '04

We just started replacing our PM3's with TC1000 boxes. The problem we are having, is when I get the box setup at two seperate locations, the T1's come up and everything looks great, however when you call the box you get nothing but dead air (basically a modem isn't answering). This has happened in two locations, one that is served off a GTD-5 and one is served off a DMS-10. In working with the telco on the DMS-10 switch, we discovered that is the circuit is set to send the digits from the call (caller ID), AND I set the option on the HiperDSP to 'Ack Wink On Dial Address Info' a modem will then answer. Does anyone know if there is a way we could work around this without having the telco change things? Here is how the PM3 is configured followed by my options set in the TC1000 box: PM3 Configuration ---------------------- line0 - T1 Inband DS0 --------------- Status: UP Framing: D4 Encoding: AMI PCM: u-law Signaling: Trunk E&M wink start TC1000 Configuration Framing Mode dsx1D4 Line Coding Options dsx1AMI Circuit Identifier Loopback Configuration dsx1NoLoop Signal Mode robbedBit Transmit Clock Source loopTiming NIC Type longHaul Response to Remote Loopback ignore Jitter Attenuation attenJitterOnRcvr Transmit Line Build Out dB0pt0 Dial In Address dnis Dial In/Out Trunk Start Signal Type wink Ack Wink On Dial In Address Info Receive Disabled Dial Out Address Delay 70 Dial In/Out Trunk Type eAndMTypeII Primary Switch Type priSw5ESS Idle Byte Pattern 254 Receiver Gain dB26 Tone Type dtmf Number of DTMF Tones 4 Send Code dsx1SendNoCode External Signaling Mode (will take effect next boot) none Overlap Receiving Mode disable Overlap Receiving Inbound Digits Expected 12 Overlap Receiving Timeout Delay 12 This is how it is set when we get 'dead air' when calling into the box. In order to get an answer the telco must configure for digits to be sent and as mentioned before, we must enable the ack wink on dial in address info. Here is the config we have on the GTD-5 switch for the PM3's and then followed by the TC1000 box. We get the same problem as we do with the DMS-10, just dead air. I have not worked with the telco on this problem so I don't know if a similiar work around might help but note that the circuits served off the GTD-5 are loop start and not wink. PM3 Config ---------------------- line0 - T1 Inband DS0 --------------- Status: UP Framing: D4 Encoding: AMI PCM: u-law Signaling: FXS loop start TC1000 Config Framing Mode dsx1D4 Line Coding Options dsx1AMI Circuit Identifier Loopback Configuration dsx1NoLoop Signal Mode robbedBit Transmit Clock Source loopTiming NIC Type longHaul Response to Remote Loopback ignore Jitter Attenuation attenJitterOnRcvr Transmit Line Build Out dB0pt0 Dial In Address dnis Dial In/Out Trunk Start Signal Type wink Ack Wink On Dial In Address Info Received disabled Dial Out Address Delay 70 Dial In/Out Trunk Type loopStart Primary Switch Type priSw5ESS Idle Byte Pattern 254 Receiver Gain dB26 Tone Type dtmf Number of DTMF Tones 4 Send Code dsx1SendNoCode External Signaling Mode (will take effect next boot) none Overlap Receiving Mode disable Overlap Receiving Inbound Digits Expected 12 Overlap Receiving Timeout Delay 12 Thank you in advance for any advice you may have.

3 10

Does anyone have the model of memory for 333NMC card
by Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net 05 Jan '04

05 Jan '04

Happy New Years. Looking to see if anyone has the exact memory type for the 333NMC. This is the memory slot module, not the removable 64MB Compactflash(SANDISK). Fits on smaller processing card mounted on main board. Any information would be helpful. Also have immediate need for MultiSpan Cards and 333NMC cards. Good opportunity to cash out on the MultSpans. I will pay you top $$$ ********************************************************************* Steve Rivera IM: srivera711 (877)WRCANET x102 for more product info got www.wrca.net Providing Hardware Solutions Since 1981.

1 0

Problem with NMC card
by Jason Keeling 05 Jan '04

05 Jan '04

I have a new rack I am trying to get up and running, but when I try and set the LAN IP to the desired IP address and save the settings to NVRAM, I get the following error: Error: Networks should be on different Interface Subnets. I've looked around at the other settings (WAN etc.) and all of those are set to a different network address, so I'm not sure what the error involves. Thanks for the help in advance. -- Jason Keeling Texas Communications 1389 N. Harvey Mitchell Pkwy. Bryan, Tx. 77803 979-775-6239 --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

3 3

Remote Server Access?!?!
by Dev 31 Dec '03

31 Dec '03

Hello all, Things will my TC RAC are further along then I expected but naturally I have hit a snag. Currently if i set the Slot:1/Mod:1 to connect to port 23 (telnet) I get the telnet login screen. That is cool.. I know that the routing is working! If I set it to point to another port where i have a generic socket daemon listening I see it connect to the socket but then dies. I know that there is no data being sent but the socket does not even see that just the connection then dropped! Anyone have any clue here?

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] No Login Packet Processing RAC?
by Joel - Fox Computers 24 Dec '03

24 Dec '03

When you throw the dumb terminal into the equation it's outside of my expertise. Sorry. Joel -----Original Message----- From: Dev [mailto:dev@umpa-us.com] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:37 AM To: Discussion relating to the 3Com/US Robotics Total Control modem systems. Subject: RE: [USR-TC] No Login Packet Processing RAC? Let me try and explain it LOL.. hopefully i can. I will have a dumb terminal that will dial in and after connecting send a hexadecimal packet of data to the server. The server will decode, process and reply to the data sent and then disconnect. I want to use the TC RAC to handle the connection and route the packet of data to a port that is listening on a server. There is not authentication at all in this. Currently i am setup with a Quad Digital/Analog modem until my T1 comes in for the HiperDSP cards. At 10:26 AM 12/22/2003, you wrote: >Is this something you want to do on the client side, or do you want the TC >do it by itself? Send more detailed explanation of what you want to do, >what the purpose is, and maybe I can help. > >- Joel > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Dev [mailto:dev@umpa-us.com] >Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 8:59 AM >To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com >Subject: [USR-TC] No Login Packet Processing RAC? > > >Hello all, > >I would like to setup my USR TC to allow a connecting that once the modems >handshake that a packet of information is sent and routed to a specific >port on a server to be processed and replied then the connection dropped! > >Can anyone help with this at all? > > > > >_______________________________________________ >USR-TC mailing list >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > >_______________________________________________ >USR-TC mailing list >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

7 9

Blocking timeslot on E1 R2
by alex 24 Dec '03

24 Dec '03

How can I block/busy out some timeslots on E1 R2 (not whole E1)? In blocking I mean sending R2 block signal to PSTN, so PSTN will know that this timeslot is blocked/busy.

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] No Login Packet Processing RAC?
by Joel - Fox Computers 22 Dec '03

22 Dec '03

Is this something you want to do on the client side, or do you want the TC do it by itself? Send more detailed explanation of what you want to do, what the purpose is, and maybe I can help. - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Dev [mailto:dev@umpa-us.com] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 8:59 AM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] No Login Packet Processing RAC? Hello all, I would like to setup my USR TC to allow a connecting that once the modems handshake that a packet of information is sent and routed to a specific port on a server to be processed and replied then the connection dropped! Can anyone help with this at all? _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

3 2

No Login Packet Processing RAC?
by Dev 22 Dec '03

22 Dec '03

Hello all, I would like to setup my USR TC to allow a connecting that once the modems handshake that a packet of information is sent and routed to a specific port on a server to be processed and replied then the connection dropped! Can anyone help with this at all?

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] HiperARC with WindowsXP Connection
by Joel - Fox Computers 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Just my observations - it's been my experience that MTU=576 doesn't work with anything, except Windows ME, which ignores this and sets it correctly by itself (and they all still talk bad about ME :-). 95/98/NT/2K/XP all will have problems when MTU is set to 576. It seems a lot of RADIUS servers have this setting by default, but a lot of RAS equipment ignores it, including pre-HiperARC Total Controls, and maybe early firmware ARC's, so the setting had no effect. When a person updates to a newer-style TC, they find users not able to browse because of the MTU setting. - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Moh. Noor Al 'Azam [mailto:noor@rad.net.id] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 1:08 AM To: Discussion relating to the 3Com/US Robotics Total Control modem systems. Subject: Re: [USR-TC] HiperARC with WindowsXP Connection Randy and all expert, thanks a lot for your information. We've been set the MTU back to 1500 and Windows XP now can browsing again. My problem is solved. Only I have my own question: why Windows XP can not recieve the MTU 576? -mna- On Thursday 18 December 2003 12:37, Randy Cosby wrote: > Why are you setting the framed-MTU? I'd look there first. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: usr-tc-bounces+dcosby=infowest.com(a)mailman.xmission.com > > [mailto:usr-tc-bounces+dcosby=infowest.com@mailman.xmission.co > > m] On Behalf Of Moh. Noor Al 'Azam > > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 9:55 PM > > To: Discussion relating to the 3Com/US Robotics Total Control > > modem systems. > > Subject: Re: [USR-TC] HiperARC with WindowsXP Connection > > > > > > Below is the resul of Monitor RADIUS and show interface where > > I connect to the > > system: > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Source-IP Src-Port Destination-IP Dest-Port Id Packet-Type > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 202.154.4.104 1645 202.154.57.45 1645 5 > > Access-Request > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > User-Name : novi > > User-Password : xxxxxxxxxx > > NAS-IP-Address : 202.154.4.104 > > NAS-Port : 1798 > > Acct-Session-Id : 117768442 > > Interface-Index : 3054 > > Nas-Supports-Tags : 0 > > Service-Type : 2 > > Framed-Protocol : PPP > > Chassis-Call-Slot : 8 > > Chassis-Call-Span : 1 > > Chassis-Call-Channel : 6 > > Calling-Station-Id : 0315472663 > > Called-Station-Id : > > Initial-Connect-Rate : 1 > > NAS-Port-Type : 0 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Source-IP Src-Port Destination-IP Dest-Port Id Packet-Type > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 202.154.57.45 1645 202.154.4.104 1645 5 > > Access-Accept > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Framed-Compression : 1 > > Primary-DNS-Server : ca 9a 39 22 > > Secondary-DNS-Server : ca 9a 1 2 > > Framed-MTU : 576 > > Session-Timeout : 36000 > > Reply-Message : Auth ok. > > > > > > > > HiPer>> show interfaCE slot:8/mod:6 > > > > INTERFACE slot:8/mod:6 SETTINGS > > Description: GWC Modem Driver > > Type: RS232 > > Speed: 24000 > > High Speed: 0 > > Administrative Status: Up > > Operational Status: Up > > Link Up/Down Traps: DISABLED > > Promiscuous Mode: FALSE > > Connector Present: TRUE > > Filter Access: OFF > > Last Change: 0d 00:01:25 > > Input Filter: > > Output Filter: > > Host Type: SELECT > > Connection Type: NORMAL > > Port Type: LOGIN_NETWORK > > User Name: > > Access: TWO_WAY > > Dial Prefix: > > Init Script: USR_int > > TCP Port: 0 > > Protocol: PPP > > Prompt: \nlogin: > > Prompt Style: LOCAL > > Message: \nWelcome to 3Com > > Total Control > > HiPer ARC (TM)\nNetworks That Go The Distance (TM)\n > > Host Address: 0.0.0.0 > > Disable Authentication for call type: NONE > > Login Service: TELNET > > Call Type : NONE > > DNIS Authentication: DISABLED > > DNIS Authentication Time: BEFORE_ANSWER > > DNIS Authentication Type: DNIS > > Character Mode: NO_PARITY_EIGHT_BIT > > DNIS Authentication Timeout: 0 > > Prompt Delay: 0 seconds > > Prompt Timeout: 300 seconds > > Special Xon Xoff Flow Control DISABLED > > Use DNIS Authenticated Pool: DISABLED > > > > We have an idea to set the system to factory default first and then > > re-configure again to our setting. Do you have any comment about our > > planning? > > > > -mna- > > > > On Wednesday 17 December 2003 19:08, alex wrote: > > > Can you put here any radius authentication packet (access-accept)? > > > You can do it on ARC: monitor radius. > > > > > > It will look like this one: > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Source-IP Src-Port Destination-IP Dest-Port Id > > > > Packet-Type > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > x.x.x.x 1812 y.y.y.y 1645 182 Access-Accept > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Time Stamp : 17-DEC-2003 17:03:01 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Framed-IP-Address : 255.255.255.254 > > > Framed-IP-Netmask : 255.255.255.255 > > > Framed-Protocol : PPP > > > Service-Type : 2 > > > Session-Timeout : 86400 > > > > > > Lewis Bergman wrote: > > > >>The strange is, it not happen on Windows 9x. I use > > > > Windows 98 SE and I > > > > > >>don't get any dificulties. But my friend with Windows XP > > > > can not browsing > > > > > >>to the most of site. So I think the RADIUS is find. > > > >>I already tried with other RADIUS also (FreeRADIUS) and I > > > > get the same > > > > > >>situation. > > > > > > > >I agree it is strange. I think this has come up on the > > > > list before though. > > > > > >Check the archives. > > > > > > > >>>That if you are using filters you disble them until you > > > > figure this out. > > > > > >>Actually, we have blocking packet from and to our > > > > customer (at modem > > > > > >>interface site) for TCP and UDP port 135 - 139. It for > > > > blocking virus > > > > > >> -like bluster. Here is the filter: > > > >>HiPer>> show file filter.135 > > > >>#filter > > > >>IP: > > > >>010 AND tcp-dst-port >= 135; > > > >>020 REJECT tcp-dst-port <= 139; > > > >>030 AND udp-dst-port >= 135; > > > >>040 REJECT udp-dst-port <= 139; > > > >>050 AND tcp-src-port >= 135; > > > >>060 REJECT tcp-src-port <= 139; > > > >>070 AND udp-src-port >= 135; > > > >>080 REJECT udp-src-port <= 139; > > > >> > > > >>Do you think this is the problem? If it true, why it anly > > > > happen at > > > > > >> Windows 32 bit (like Windows XP)? and not at Windows 9x? > > > > > > > >When I have a problerm I try to get to the base level, get > > > > it working, > > > > > > then add stuff back in one at a time. Exactly what > > > > attributes are you > > > > > > replying from radius with? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > USR-TC mailing list > > > USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > > > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > > > _______________________________________________ > > USR-TC mailing list > > USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > _______________________________________________ > USR-TC mailing list > USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

Hiper Trax?
by Dev 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Okay got the Hiper Arc Manager, Thank you Alex! Does anyone know where to get an old version of Hiper Trax?

1 0