March 2002 - USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

RE: (usr-tc) NMC not responding
by Mark E. Levy 06 May '03

06 May '03

I;ve had this happen a few times. Just reboot the NMC card by sliding it out if the chassis or via the console interface and it will be well again (until next time). Rebooting the NMC won't affect active users sessions. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark E. Levy, President FSInet, Inc. | System Management Associates, Inc. 800-827-6085 x202 | 847-291-1550 x202 847-753-6832 fax | 847-291-3866 fax www.fsi.net | www.sysman-inc.com mark(a)fsi.net | levy(a)sysman-inc.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Mcadams [mailto:jeffm@iglou.com] > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 9:51 AM > To: usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: (usr-tc) NMC not responding > > > Also sprach Kirk Mitchell > > My NMC recently stopped responding to SNMP queries, etc and I'm > >unable to access it via TCM. It has, however, not seemed to affect > >anything as far as dial-up, routing, etc. Other than the fact that I > >can't run MRTG against it or the badmodems.pl script, there's no > >indication that it's having problems. > > Not surprising. The NMC does not have anything to do with the routine > actions of taking and handling calls...it is what it says it > is...purely > a management card. You can totally remove the NMC and not lose any of > the actual *production* functionality of the chassis. > > > Has the card gone bad...need replaced, lost something in part of > >config? How do I go about finding/fixing the problem? > > Proly just needs a reboot, or possibly a reconfig...I've had > a few lose > some of the config (including IP addresses and stuff), and a reconfig > from console (takes me about 30 seconds these days) gets them > fully back > up and running (sucks if its a remote city though). > -- > Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm(a)iglou.com > Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 > IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456 > > - > To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com" > with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. > For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send > "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. > - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.

2 4

RE: [USR-TC] Forcing a default route for customer through radius
by Brian Becker 13 Feb '03

13 Feb '03

I was hoping to do it by Radius though. Isn't there a way to do it by framed-route or something like that? Brian Becker President, Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. http://semo.net P.O. Box 190 | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | 573.686.9114 -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin(a)mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Mcadams Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:03 PM To: usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] Forcing a default route for customer through radius Also sprach Brian Becker >Is there an attribute to force a default route other than the normal >via radius for a particular customer? Check into the Internet Equal Access (IEA) feature. Basically let's you set up per-user default routes. I've not used this feature personally, so I don't know how much help I can be on configuration issues, but I know that's what it does. :) Another option might be to configure the customer as a tunnel user and tunnel them to wherever you need to get their traffic, though there are, obviously, some complications from that. -- Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm(a)iglou.com Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456 _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

6 9

TCM and XP
by Steve Cobb 02 Aug '02

02 Aug '02

I sent this before but I'm not sure that it went through. I'm trying to use TCM 6.0.23 with Windows XP and I can't get it to install. Anyone doing this? Thanks, Steve Cobb

8 8

(usr-tc) FW: [datacomm] Secret access to TCs
by Brian Becker 25 Jun '02

25 Jun '02

The newest edition to our IT Department (he's been in Tech Support for 3 years) emailed me this afternoon (full email below). I didn't believe him at first so I telneted to on of our TC boxes and when prompted with "Login:" I typed adm and pressed Enter. HOLY COW! It said "Hiper:" and I had full access. I'm curious as to how many people on this list were vulnerable like us (we have 20 TC boxes throughout Southeast Missouri). Brian Brian Becker President, Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. P.O. Box 190 | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | 573.686.9114 Home of http://semo.net - Southeast Missouri's Online Community http://TotallyFabricated.com Total Scrutinizer - Tech Support Just Got Easier WebGabber - All-html Web Chat Software -----Original Message----- From: Adam Barnhill Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 6:41 PM To: ---interoffice DataComm List--- Subject: [datacomm] Secret access to TCs It has come to my attention that our TCs were vulnerable to anyone's attack. User : adm Would allow access to manage and login to our TCs. The fix was easy. Just 'del user adm' and then 'save all' (thanx Brian) I was actually searching for TC command references, and happened upon ;) a hack list of default and backdoor passwords. The link I originally found a hack article on is http://the.wiretapped.net/security/info/textfiles/k1ine_11.txt and the password list is in that tree somewhere.. Lots of backdoors for other RAS, switches, hubs and other.. Adam Barnhill Systems Technician / IT Dept. Semo.net / Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. 1(877)686-9114 http://semo.net/ _______________________________________________ datacomm mailing list datacomm(a)lists.semo.net http://lists.semo.net/mailman/listinfo/datacomm - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.

5 5

(usr-tc) Upgraded TC's
by Mark Thornton 21 Jun '02

21 Jun '02

We jsut upgraded our TC chassis to the lastest available code (yes we paid for support) and the phones have stopped ringing. We always had a certain level of calls with various connection problems of one sort or another, but that seems to have dried up in the week since we installed the new code. We made the decision to go with the paid support over replacement of our chassis strictly on financial grounds. There was no way to amortize new equipment costs for our dialup market. Yes, it blows to have to pay for something others get for free, however I must say the support I have gotten is so much better than what I ever got from 3Com directly. There has been no backlash from the new code that I have found which is also a welcome change. Mark Thornton San Marcos Internet, Inc 512-393-5300 - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo(a)xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.

16 21

Re: [USR-TC] v.92... 3com's ripoff/joke plan
by John Mies 16 Apr '02

16 Apr '02

I just received the word today from my support people what it would take to upgrade to v.92. I bought my chassis in February, 1999. 1. Need to send the current ARC in for memory upgrade to 128. Memory needs to be soldered in. Cost - $750. Will give me a loaner ARC for a $2500 deposit. 2. Need to upgrade (replace) the 486 NMC to Pentium. Cost - $2,500. 3. Newest software version (I already downloaded it from my current support plan). Total cost to upgrade: $3,250. At 12:21 PM 2/26/02 -0600, WayneG wrote: >Actually that's incorrect. > It will only cost the price of a software-only service contract for a >base chassis, which is around $650-$700. I find this to be a reasonable >cost, considering the glut of used TC equipment (super low cost) available. > > -Wayne > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ed Taylor" <ed(a)1st.net> >To: <usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com> >Cc: <WayneG(a)uplogon.com> >Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:59 AM >Subject: RE: [USR-TC] v.92... 3com's ripoff/joke plan > > > > Yes you would need to pay an extra $2700 for the v.92 Software update. > > It is calculated per port... > > > > It's a another 3com classic ripoff. > > > > -- > > Edgar D. Taylor > > President/CEO > > FIRST USA Inc. > > Voice: (800)716-6190 > > Email: ed(a)1st.net > > Web: www.1st.net > > -- > > > > >_______________________________________________ >USR-TC mailing list >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > > >-=-=- >SBG-Priority: 4 (Low) http://www.internz.com/SpamBeGone/

5 8

Re: [USR-TC] Routing a subnet to a dial-up
by FIRST NOC TC Subscriber 03 Apr '02

03 Apr '02

Kirk, destination gateway metric 22.33.44.224/28 55.66.77.198 1 Of course I would also manually put the static IP in 'IP Address' field. Might want to set RIP routing too - but you said that you have a static route in your gateway router so there wouldn't be any need for RIP. But you'd set this route to be RIPd in the same section if you were going to depend upon TC RIP broadcasts to dump routes into your gateway router. Mike Tindor FIRST Internet ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Kirk Mitchell <mitch(a)keyconn.net> Reply-To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 18:06:10 -0500 >At 05:21 PM 3/27/02 -0500, Jeff Mcadams wrote: >>Also sprach Kirk Mitchell >>>I have a customer with a static IP address and a public IP /28 behind >>>his ISDN router. My gateway router is sending traffic for his subnet to >>>the ARC, but the ARC isn't accepting it and sending it down the dial-up >>>connection. What for routing do I need to have set up in the ARC to do >>>this? >> >>Add a "Framed-Route" attribute in the user's RADIUS profile. > > I'm not sure how to do this with USR's S&A Server. The Routing section of >Radius wants destination1, gateway1, etc. I'm used to thinking of routing >in terms of Cisco'ese and not sure how that translates to what I need to >enter here. Also, to make sure I explained things properly, the customer's >static IP and his subnet are from different blocks... >static IP is 55.66.77.198 >subnet is 22.33.44.224/28 >I need something the equivalent of >ip route 22.33.44.224 255.255.255.240 55.66.77.198 > >Thanks, > >-- >Kirk Mitchell-General Manager mitch(a)keyconn.net >Keystone Connect Unlock Your World >Altoona, PA 814-941-5000 http://www.keyconn.net > > >_______________________________________________ >USR-TC mailing list >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > ________________________________________________________________ 1st.net

6 13

filter
by Kancha . 31 Mar '02

31 Mar '02

any tutorial / documents on creating filter ?? I want to create filter to restrict dialup users to access only smtp, pop, and dns service and deny rest. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] ARC 5.3.2 code, whats the HARM?
by Scott Trautman 29 Mar '02

29 Mar '02

Me too! Me too! No workee workee bad broken no good now for sure. 226 w/532 I asked about that a couple weeks ago already. I re-flashed down to 5.2.102 and fine all the way around. I thought they'd get around to it....eventually, as in ever. Fix then? Perty-Please? Scott M. Trautman Global Dialog Internet

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] ARC 5.3.2 code, whats the HARM?
by Mike Greene 29 Mar '02

29 Mar '02

At 06:25 PM 3/29/02 -0500, you wrote: >CommWorks isn't making a new version of HARM from what we've been told. The >last version of HARM is supposed to be compatible with the 5.3.2 code. I can confirm that the latest (2.2.6) does not work with 5.3.2 - Mike ------------------------------------------------ Rock Island Communications, Inc. (360)-378-5884 http://www.rockisland.com/ San Juan Islands, WA ------------------------------------------------

1 0