16 Aug
2004
16 Aug
'04
10:04 p.m.
In article <41210084.4461.6F67CC@localhost>, "Tim Wegner" <twegner@swbell.net> writes:
Why does the license have to be more permissive than GPL? GPL is fine for sourceforge.
Sourceforge allows any number of open source licenses; I just thought that the fractint source code had existing licenses on pieces that were incompatible with GPL, but GPL is fine with me. Is the xfractint port sufficiently different that we can slap GPL on it and put it on sourceforge? That would make CVS usage *so* much easier. -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ: <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/> Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty <http://pilgrimage.scene.org>