Hi Ted, I've noticed that same issue. I did use those headings in bib records because they will eventually be upgraded and when they are, I'll be able to correct (sometimes for the second time) headings to the proper form. At least they will -match- an established heading authority record and our cataloging workflow continues unimpeded because we're waiting for 'someone' to update those authority records. Judith Kirk Coordinator, Authority Control Western Michigan University Libraries Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008-5353 ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Waller" <wallert@meredith.edu> To: "Backstage Library Works Authority Contol Listserv" <bslwac@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 9:44:01 AM Subject: [BSLWAC] RDA, uniform titles, THIS 1XX FIELD CANNOT BE USED
After reloading all bibs and authorities for the RDA upgrade, we have a number of authorities with the 667 THIS 1XX FIELD CANNOT BE USED UNDER RDA UNTIL THIS RECORD HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND/OR UPDATED.
The list I have comes from an III blind headings report and is all uniform titles. I imagine there are other types of authorities with the same message.
My question is: Should I ignore this 667 message and change headings in bib records to match the authority?
Ted
Ted Waller Carlyle Campbell Library Meredith College 919 760 8381 _______________________________________________ BSLWAC mailing list BSLWAC@mailman.xmission.com https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bslwac