Thanks for that, Rob. I think a lot of us old-timers are familiar with Burnham's story. Sad, to be sure, but all of his problems were avoidable and pretty much self-inflicted. The man needed help and never sought it properly, was incapable of losing his bitterness and moving-on. Funny but eccentricity almost always accompanies genius, sometimes to the point of self-destruction, sadly. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Hi Chuck That was my 1st time hearing of Robert Burnham's life. I know some people like him, brilliant but need help ..............
Robert Burnham displayed several hallmarks of mental illness. If you look at his life after he graduated from high school, his first job, and his devotion to collecting scientific data, you can see that he was not a person who budged out of an existing structure (or rut) in his life. He was clearly most happy with defined goals, and a repetitive set of tasks that he could successfully accomplish. (They need not be the same task, nor do they have to be mindless, they simply have to have a clearly defined "map" that one can follow to solve the problems.) A highly structured life is often key to a mentally ill person's ability to live a more normal life. Lowell Observatory provided that structure for Burnham for many years. When that job ended, Burnham was deeply entrenched in that structure, and was unable to create another one. While he had a stream of income from the royalties, he could continue his same life of observing and writing, outside of the observatory. When the income dried up, he was lost. Often, a spouse or close family member can help a person create another, but Burnham's illness was not recognized as such. While his family was supportive, they did not know what he was dealing with, nor that he had passed the point where he could, himself, find a new "rut" and settle into it. Left without his structured life, he was unable to cope. His illness progressed rapidly, and he was incapable of handling the chaos of everyday life. None of this is to deny his genius, he clearly had a passionate love of what he was doing. He melded his love of philosophy with the repetitive nature of observing, to create the handbook we all have and love today. But with his genius, he had a mental illness that was not commonly recognized, and that, by its very nature, made him incapable of seeking help himself.
I agree with Jo, that Burnham had a mental disability. Probably he was autstic, judging from his lack of deep personal relationships and heavy focus on certain obsessions -- obsessions that actually served him and ourselves very well indeed. But he was capable of splendid work, as his Handbook proves. It's three volumes have always had, literally, a special place on my shelves -- not mixed with other books, but set apart, because they are unique and I treasure them. That he was fired by Lowell Observatory is shameful, if we are to believe the account by Tony Ortega in the Phoenix New Times. That firing ruined his life. I think there was professional jealousy from the start, when a non-academic was hired to carry out an important star survey. I suspect it reached the boiling stage when he produced a really magnificent book that eclipsed everything anyone else at the observatory was doing. After all, Clyde Tombaugh, another amateur working for Lowell, had discovered Pluto -- and now this book. What made it worse is that Lowell Observatory had refused to publish the Handbook and Burnham somehow put it out himself. I was struck by the article's account that Burnham suggested the observatory develop a gift shop and that they accommodate visitors better with a slide show; that he even paid for curtains (or was it blinds?) for the slides show out of his own pocket. The observatory rejected his efforts, fired him, and ten years later, did everything he had suggested. Ignoring his suggestions and firing him was just mean-spirited. He was a sensitive person who reached out through his disability in the best way he could, by writing about the things he loved, and he produced a masterpiece. Nothing before or since is equal to his Handbook, and I hope someone does update it. Years ago I called Astronomy Magazine about something, and found myself talking to Robert Burnham. Wow, Robert Burnham! I was floored to be speaking with this writer I so admired. I told him how much I loved his book. But it was the wrong Robert Burnham -- he was only the magazine's senior editor. I was pretty disappointed. There are souls who are a little different from the rest of us, and who deserve to be nurtured and honored. I think Robert Burnham Jr., the Handbook's author, is a perfect example of this. It's crappy, says something unpleasant about our society, that such a valuable person was trashed. Thanks for letting me shoot my mouth off -- Joe
participants (4)
-
Chuck Hards -
Joe Bauman -
Josephine Grahn -
Rob Ratkowski