Hi Guy: Get your Kevlar vest on. I know the laser pointer is here to stay on the observing field (until the Homeland Security Czar takes them away...). -However- If more people come to star parties with GoTo telescopes and laser pointers, than without them, then they are there more for the techie stuff than the view through the eyepiece. Setting circles, digital or traditional, work just as well as a GoTo mount, but not nearly as "cool" to the gadget-happy consumer. If your desire is simply to "pack 'em in", hold a raffle, get a bikini-clad airhead to recline on your telescope, bring a keg, roast a pig! But don't get high and mighty about Technology the Liberator of Mankind. I'm not anti-technology, never said I was, but this is a specific case of inventing a need. From my perspective, the GoTo and laser technology does not make the visual astronomy experience better; this is strictly subjective and not empirical at all. I honestly can't relate to that claim and (sic) refuse to acknowledge it's validity. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion (humble though it may be...). Where you actually a scientist gathering data, or an imager with a target list, time would be at a premium and this argument would be valid, but as a "nature lover" and socialite it just isn't.
From your own statement it is clear that the star party itself and social interaction is the primary motivation here, not increasing one's working knowledge of the sky. May as well be in a philatetic society or book club.
Sure, if the laser works to lure in recruits, OK, but it would be nice to actually teach people something useful. Yes, you point out the object quickly and easily, look really authoritative wielding it as you stab the sky with your light-sabre, but the next night most of those looking up that beam won't be able to remember where you pointed at all. Pity no-one pulled out a star chart and actually showed them how to delineate a constellation and use the stars themselves as a landmark, then helped them find it in the sky themselves. Give a man a fish and he eats for a day; teach a man to fish...well you know the rest. But it's quantity over quality, I forgot. There are exceptions of course, as Gary said, but these are rare individuals with a real desire to learn, and not typical. Don't worry, you probably won't have to give up your laser until someone pries it from your cold, dead hand. I come from a time when the astro-clubs were a gathering place for people genuinely interested in astronomy and related sciences, not just as an excuse to sit around in a lawn chair and shoot the breeze, holding court before the novices. I suppose that makes me an anachronism. And damn proud of it in this case. I'll post no more on this subject.
purchase telescopes or otherwise become involved in astronomy doesn't matter. What matters is that they keep coming back night after night to engage those of us who show up.
I know, I know, with a manual scope or binoculars, and a thorough knowledge of the sky, who needs technology? It is 2005, and while it's great to live in a simpler less complicated time, technology is here and it's here for a reason. It is used to make things better. To help make better use of time. And whether that technology comes in the form of a green laser, or a fully computerized telescope, that will level and align it'self, that will track an object clear across the sky while you sit back and drink coffee, or, shoot the breeze with your friends, I believe that regardless of it's form, technology has a place at star parties...JMHO
Guy
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
Hi Chuck, Don't run off just yet though, tell me more about this bikini clad airhead... ;) Quoting Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com>:
get a bikini-clad airhead to recline on your telescope, bring a keg, roast a pig!
I'll post no more on this subject.
Wow. I signed up for this list as a way to get local information on what has been a low budget foray into Atsronomy. I do not have the money for any fancy gear. I have a Wal-mart special Meade telescope and a pair of 10x70 Binoculars that I bought on the recomendation of the folks on this list. I don't claim to have much skill in finding my way around the sky, but I enjoy the hunt. As someone new to the hobby I must admit that the tone of some of the posts lately have not made me eager to embrace the local community. Chuck Hards:
"From your own statement it is clear that the star party itself and social interaction is the primary motivation here, not increasing one's working knowledge of the sky. May as well be in a philatetic society or book club."
I don't know about you, but it isn't much of a star party without social interaction.
Hi Jon, Welcome to the clubhouse :) Girls are allowed, but we are happy to argue about most everything else. We tend to forget how many other people are lurking here, reading our thoughts. At last count, the list had about 130 members, of which only ten to fifteen actively post anything. Discussions such as we have seen over green lasers recently are usually indicative of too much cloud cover and not enough photons. Combine that with the holidays, and we all get a little stir crazy. It is easy, under those circumstances, to have a lively (some would say heated) discussion among ourselves and forget that many of the readers don't see the friendship that underlies the discussion. If you see these guys at the next meeting, they will be good friends, all working towards the same goals, and still giving each other the same sort of grief you see here in the forums. But, in person, it is easier to see that this is just noise in the overall scheme of things. In the long run, this is a hobby, and as such, has no right or wrong way to be done, just the way that each person get the most enjoyment out of it. (Excluding, of course, the basic "good citizen" guidelines about being considerate of your fellow observers.) Some of us love dark sky parties and lots of searching for faint fuzzies, some of us are into public star parties with the teaching and interaction those have, others just like getting out with fellow observers, (and some of us are just socially unacceptable :) ). We all know this, but it does not stop us from trying to convince others of our point of view, during those long, cloudy, photon deprived, cold winter nights. Don't take it to seriously! Jo At 11:48 PM 1/7/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Wow. I signed up for this list as a way to get local information on what has been a low budget foray into Atsronomy. I do not have the money for any fancy gear. I have a Wal-mart special Meade telescope and a pair of 10x70 Binoculars that I bought on the recomendation of the folks on this list. I don't claim to have much skill in finding my way around the sky, but I enjoy the hunt.
As someone new to the hobby I must admit that the tone of some of the posts lately have not made me eager to embrace the local community.
I agree. My post itself was a bit harsher than I had intended. I was mostly posting because the tone of some of the posts is a bit intimidating for a newcomer. The list has been most helpful for me in the past year or so that I have been a subscriber. I am hoping that I might actually be able to make a couple star parties this year since I am no longer working every night and weekend.
From: Josephine Grahn <bsi@xmission.com> Reply-To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: RE: [Utah-astronomy] Re: When lasers are outlawed, etc. Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:51:57 -0700
Hi Jon,
Welcome to the clubhouse :) Girls are allowed, but we are happy to argue about most everything else. We tend to forget how many other people are lurking here, reading our thoughts. At last count, the list had about 130 members, of which only ten to fifteen actively post anything. Discussions such as we have seen over green lasers recently are usually indicative of too much cloud cover and not enough photons. Combine that with the holidays, and we all get a little stir crazy. It is easy, under those circumstances, to have a lively (some would say heated) discussion among ourselves and forget that many of the readers don't see the friendship that underlies the discussion. If you see these guys at the next meeting, they will be good friends, all working towards the same goals, and still giving each other the same sort of grief you see here in the forums. But, in person, it is easier to see that this is just noise in the overall scheme of things.
In the long run, this is a hobby, and as such, has no right or wrong way to be done, just the way that each person get the most enjoyment out of it. (Excluding, of course, the basic "good citizen" guidelines about being considerate of your fellow observers.) Some of us love dark sky parties and lots of searching for faint fuzzies, some of us are into public star parties with the teaching and interaction those have, others just like getting out with fellow observers, (and some of us are just socially unacceptable :) ). We all know this, but it does not stop us from trying to convince others of our point of view, during those long, cloudy, photon deprived, cold winter nights. Don't take it to seriously!
Jo
At 11:48 PM 1/7/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Wow. I signed up for this list as a way to get local information on what has been a low budget foray into Atsronomy. I do not have the money for any fancy gear. I have a Wal-mart special Meade telescope and a pair of 10x70 Binoculars that I bought on the recomendation of the folks on this list. I don't claim to have much skill in finding my way around the sky, but I enjoy the hunt.
As someone new to the hobby I must admit that the tone of some of the posts lately have not made me eager to embrace the local community.
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
participants (4)
-
Chuck Hards -
diveboss@xmission.com -
Jon Christensen -
Josephine Grahn