RE: [Utah-astronomy] (From NASA) Mars - Recent Gushing Water and NewCraters
This is HUGE news. I'm amazed that the press is being so nonchalant about it. Well, the NASA press release had a few multisyllable words. That's too hard to read for most members of the press (Joe B excepted).
This does raise all the questions you mentioned Seth. But there's one interesting question that I don't believe I've heard the exobiologists bring up. I'll express it in a roundabout way. It's clear that the more we learn about Earth, the more places we find life. Extremophiles live in hot, acidic water. They live in cracks deep in the mantle of the earth. They live frozen in ice and high in the atmosphere. This knowledge has certainly caused us to broaden our sense of possibility about the origin of life. There may be conditions on Mars now that are close to conditions where things are alive here. But what we don't really know yet is whether life on Earth originated under all these conditions. It may have. Or it may have originated in more traditionally "favorable" conditions and then radiated outward into these extreme niches. One might certainly imagine that, once life had a foothold, evolution could eventually find forms that could survive in extreme conditions--conditions where the chemistry might not have kicked off life ex nihilo. I guess we won't know till we know. MC
A couple of questions for the smarties on the list: Have the two rovers already spread microbial "infection" across the surface areas they have explored? Or does spending 9 months in the vaccuum of space getting there effectively kill any chance of that possibility? How doable is it to send up a robotic vehicle capable of drilling deep enough to tap into underground water sources? Seems like a pretty difficult task to me... I was pretty blown away by this news. Liquid water! I don't know about the press, but it got me pretty pumped (pun intended)! --- Michael Carnes <michaelcarnes@earthlink.net> wrote:
This is HUGE news. I'm amazed that the press is being so nonchalant about it. Well, the NASA press release had a few multisyllable words. That's too hard to read for most members of the press (Joe B excepted).
This does raise all the questions you mentioned Seth. But there's one interesting question that I don't believe I've heard the exobiologists bring up. I'll express it in a roundabout way. It's clear that the more we learn about Earth, the more places we find life. Extremophiles live in hot, acidic water. They live in cracks deep in the mantle of the earth. They live frozen in ice and high in the atmosphere. This knowledge has certainly caused us to broaden our sense of possibility about the origin of life. There may be conditions on Mars now that are close to conditions where things are alive here.
But what we don't really know yet is whether life on Earth originated under all these conditions. It may have. Or it may have originated in more traditionally "favorable" conditions and then radiated outward into these extreme niches. One might certainly imagine that, once life had a foothold, evolution could eventually find forms that could survive in extreme conditions--conditions where the chemistry might not have kicked off life ex nihilo.
I guess we won't know till we know.
MC
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
____________________________________________________________________________________ Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now.
That's a great question, Rich. I bet there has been some contamination. Remember the old "First Men on the Moon?" -- Joe
Have the two rovers already spread microbial "infection" across the surface areas they have explored? Or does spending 9 months in the vaccuum of space getting there effectively kill any chance of that possibility?
participants (3)
-
Joe Bauman -
Michael Carnes -
Richard Tenney