Does anyone have any expirience with Coma Correctors? My newly completed 16" f/5 has coma. I would appreciate any advise anyone might have on how to deal with coma. The Lumicon and TelVue correctors are several hundred dollars so I don't want to just buy one to experiment. Thanks. Dave
I have the Lumicon coma corrector, bought it used about ten years ago for a song. It is optimized for f/4.5, but shows moderate improvement with f/4 to f/5 systems. I never need it on anything I own slower than f/5. Just about any fast mirror has some coma. It is made more apparent using wide-field eyepieces, sometimes disappears completely with more mainstream eyepiece designs such as Plossls & Orthos. If you use TV eyepieces, I would suggest the TV coma corrector, otherwise use a more "mundane" eyepiece line, with a field that lies inside the coma-free zone (or at least shuns the outer, most offensive areas). My comments are for visual use. I"ve never used the Lumicon unit for imaging, so I can't comment on whether the field is truly flat. Too, coma is usually only apparent at very low powers. Don't think of it as mirror "flaw", think of it as a mismatch between the mirror and your eyepieces. --- DunnDave@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone have any expirience with Coma Correctors? My newly completed 16" f/5 has coma. I would appreciate any advise anyone might have on how to deal with coma. The Lumicon and TelVue correctors are several hundred dollars so I don't want to just buy one to experiment.
Thanks. Dave
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Dave, Are you sure it is coma? Many times astigmatism is mistaken for coma. Astigmatism induced by a mirror changes as as you go inside and outside of focus. The stars will be oblong tangentially on one side of focus and oblong radially on the other side of focus. Astigmatism induced by your eye will show oblong stars on both sides of focus, and at focus. The oblong direction and amount will not change with focus, and will be in the same direction across the field. Coma is apparent in the outer portions of the field of view and will be radial on both sides of focus. Mirror induced astigmatism is at its minimum when the image is focused. Coma and eye induced astigmatism are independent of focus position. Brent --- DunnDave@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone have any expirience with Coma Correctors? My newly completed 16" f/5 has coma. I would appreciate any advise anyone might have on how to deal with coma. The Lumicon and TelVue correctors are several hundred dollars so I don't want to just buy one to experiment.
Thanks. Dave
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Hi Dave, Dave Bernson and I were very pleased with the Paracorr purchased for the 20" f/4 Galaxy Optics dobsonian we built back in '88. (I'm not familiar with the lumicon coma correctors.) We used it for several years without any correction but the Paracorr is now nearly mandatory with low to medium powers. You could super-glue it in and you'd be happy. Dave has a set of the Type 2 Naglers (12mm, 16mm, & 20mm) so keep in mind we were using a Televue product with Televue eyepieces. A few months ago we held an impromptu eyepiece comparison in my front yard comparing an 11mm Nagler Type 1, a 12mm Type 2 & 4, and a 14mm Meade Ultra Wide. Because I have a 10" f/5 dob, Dave also brought the paracorr to see what improvement there would be. As I recall, the Paracorr wasn't terribly needed (though improved) at the 100 power level but when we put in a 20mm nagler at 64x the correction was obvious. I'm sure we could arrange some way for you to try out the paracorr before you purchase anything. Hope this helps a bit, Dave Bennett (801)583-3295 On Tuesday, Sep 16, 2003, at 11:09 US/Mountain, DunnDave@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone have any expirience with Coma Correctors? My newly completed 16" f/5 has coma. I would appreciate any advise anyone might have on how to deal with coma. The Lumicon and TelVue correctors are several hundred dollars so I don't want to just buy one to experiment.
Thanks. Dave
The new 2" Televue paracor works superb with my 18" f/4.3. Stars are pinpoint to the edge. It is used with all eyepieces even high power and is adjustable depending on the eyepiece. With fast optics it is critical to have very accurate collimation see the June 2002 Sky and Telescope. The paracor makes the collimation a tad bit more forgiving. An f/5 scope is more forgiving than a f/4.3, make sure your scope is very accurately collimated before you decide how much you need it. Clear Skies Don Colton -----Original Message----- From: utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:utah-astronomy-bounces@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of DunnDave@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:10 AM To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com Subject: [Utah-astronomy] Coma Does anyone have any expirience with Coma Correctors? My newly completed 16" f/5 has coma. I would appreciate any advise anyone might have on how to deal with coma. The Lumicon and TelVue correctors are several hundred dollars so I don't want to just buy one to experiment. Thanks. Dave _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
participants (5)
-
Brent Watson -
Chuck Hards -
David L Bennett -
Don J. Colton -
DunnDave@aol.com