I've added a shot of (596) Scheila from this morning next to the one I took on the 13th. Same equipment, exposure and minimal processing on both. http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=6 patrick
This makes me wonder if there's any difference between some asteroids and comets. Thanks, Joe --- On Thu, 12/16/10, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote:
From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New (596) Scheila image To: "utah astronomy utah astronomy listserve" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 5:38 AM I've added a shot of (596) Scheila from this morning next to the one I took on the 13th.
Same equipment, exposure and minimal processing on both.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=6
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Joe: It could be a matter of degree.
From snowballs to dirty snowballs, to snowy dirtballs, to a rocks with ice on them, to dry rocks. There are still plenty of for sure comets and no mistake asteroids. We use different naming rules for comets and asteroids, but that's our problem not the fault of the bodies in questions.
The same applies to planets and non-planets, also globular clusters and the nuclei of captured dwarf galaxies. It's just tomatoes pronounced two different ways. The names humans use make no difference to the underling reality. DT --- On Thu, 12/16/10, Joe Bauman <josephmbauman@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Joe Bauman <josephmbauman@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New (596) Scheila image To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 11:36 AM This makes me wonder if there's any difference between some asteroids and comets. Thanks, Joe
--- On Thu, 12/16/10, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote:
From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New (596) Scheila image To: "utah astronomy utah astronomy listserve" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 5:38 AM I've added a shot of (596) Scheila from this morning next to the one I took on the 13th.
Same equipment, exposure and minimal processing on both.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=6
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
Good points, Daniel. I just heard an Internet broadcast in which Mike Brown (killer of Pluto, discoverer of the largest solar system object to be found in 150 years) say to forget about the tortured definition of planet that the astronomical union came up with. His idea is that there are eight massive objects orbiting the sun and millions of small objects. We call the big ones planets. That makes sense to me! -- Joe --- On Thu, 12/16/10, daniel turner <outwest112@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: daniel turner <outwest112@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New (596) Scheila image To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 5:12 PM Joe:
It could be a matter of degree.
From snowballs to dirty snowballs, to snowy dirtballs, to a rocks with ice on them, to dry rocks. There are still plenty of for sure comets and no mistake asteroids. We use different naming rules for comets and asteroids, but that's our problem not the fault of the bodies in questions.
The same applies to planets and non-planets, also globular clusters and the nuclei of captured dwarf galaxies. It's just tomatoes pronounced two different ways.
The names humans use make no difference to the underling reality.
DT
--- On Thu, 12/16/10, Joe Bauman <josephmbauman@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Joe Bauman <josephmbauman@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] New (596) Scheila image To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 11:36 AM This makes me wonder if there's any difference between some asteroids and comets. Thanks, Joe
--- On Thu, 12/16/10, Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> wrote:
From: Patrick Wiggins <paw@wirelessbeehive.com> Subject: [Utah-astronomy] New (596) Scheila image To: "utah astronomy utah astronomy listserve" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 5:38 AM I've added a shot of (596) Scheila from this morning next to the one I took on the 13th.
Same equipment, exposure and minimal processing on both.
http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=68&g2_page=6
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
participants (3)
-
daniel turner -
Joe Bauman -
Patrick Wiggins