The thin crescent moon above Venus made a beautiful pair before dawn this morning. Tomorrow (Tuesday) should be even better, as the moon will be much closer to Venus, and even thinner. Watch Venus slide south with increasing rapidity over the next several weeks, following the sun's seasonal migration as it quickly decreases in declination. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com> wrote:
The thin crescent moon above Venus made a beautiful pair before dawn this morning. Tomorrow (Tuesday) should be even better, as the moon will be much closer to Venus, and even thinner.
Yes, tomorrow morning between 5:30am and 6:15 am will be special. In addition to the 1 1/2 day waxing crescent before the new Moom on the 23rd, 4 planetary bodies will be within 4 1/2 degs (in order of rising): Venus Moon Saturn and last - Mercury It will make for a good wide-field astrophoto opportunity. - Canopus56 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
I assume you meant "waning" crescent... The moon a planetary body? Is there another planetary status proposal I haven't read yet? Sorry Kurt, I couldn't resist! ;o) BTW, the earthshine this AM was especially strong...I wonder what the earth's cloud-cover percentage was at the time, on the daylight hemisphere? Or maybe I've just been eating more carrots lately? --- Canopus56 <canopus56@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes, tomorrow morning between 5:30am and 6:15 am will be special. In addition to the 1 1/2 day waxing crescent before the new Moom on the 23rd, 4 planetary bodies will be within 4 1/2 degs (in order of rising):
Venus Moon Saturn and last - Mercury
It will make for a good wide-field astrophoto opportunity.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Hey Chuck It's 2:08AM here in Hawaii and I'm about ready to haul it to the top of Haleakala for the morning grouping. Coffee is made, car is packed and from what I see, summit wind is 1.37 mph, humidity 7.4% and IR cloud cam shows very little if any high cirrus. See ya, Rob
From here the skyglow was too bright for a photo, by the time the moon cleared the mountains. An exceedingly thin crescent- I think this would have looked great from about the mid-atlantic, when the moon was closer to Venus and the sky would have been still sufficiently dark.
Hope you got a decent shot. I got a shiver seeing Sirius this morning. The summer is so fleeting. Especially when you don't get any time off! (Grrrr) --- Rob Ratkowski Photography <ratkwski@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Hey Chuck
It's 2:08AM here in Hawaii and I'm about ready to haul it to the top of Haleakala for the morning grouping. Coffee is made, car is packed and from what I see, summit wind is 1.37 mph, humidity 7.4% and IR cloud cam shows very little if any high cirrus.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Chuck and Joe I added 2 photos from this morning. Venus appeared at first as a great orange star, followed by a thin crescent moon that got lost in the blaze as the sun rose. I had to coax Saturn w/ some contrast enhancement to make it visible in the photo. Haleakala is such a GREAT place to watch the rising sun and to encounter the night sky. A hui ho Rob
Beautiful, Rob. And wy don't you contact Sky & Telescope about the zodiacal light view? That's truly spectacular. Do these events happen more often in Hawaii because of the ocean reflecting light? Or is it just as rare there as anywhere else? Thanks, Joe
Aloha Joe I'll shoot the ZL next month when it REALLY shines and then submit photos to S+T. In the tropics the ZL is more common through out the year, we see it maybe 6 months out of the year, but late September and late April are tops. The ZL looks like a sword piercing the night sky, very impressive. Aloha Rob
It's pretty impressive from here, too. Since it is sunlight scattered by dust in the plane of the ecliptic, it follows that it is most visible when the ecliptic forms the greatest angle with respect to the horizon- spring and fall in the northern hemisphere. The last time I saw it, and one of the most impressive apparitions, was when I was shooting Hale-Bopp in the spring of '97 (has it really been over 9 years??). As I was wrapping-up my session early one evening, I remember thinking "I really should try and see the Zodiacal light while I'm out here." I turned around from the car and faced west- BAM! There it was! Nothing subtle about it, it was obvious, tremendous. A huge, tapering sword of light ascending to the heavens- your description is right-on. And this was just north of I-80, near the second Grantsville exit, just a few miles from the Tooele valley/Skull valley border. Not even at a remote site. --- Rob Ratkowski Photography <ratkwski@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
late September and late April are tops. The ZL looks like a sword piercing the night sky, very impressive.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Well-done! I have to admit that when I saw how bright the sky was by the time the moon rose this morning, I didn't give you much of a chance- I didn't take your lower latitude and lower horizon into consideration. I can clearly see the lunar crescent. Jeez, it looks like you've taken purdy pitchers before! ;) --- Rob Ratkowski Photography <ratkwski@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Chuck and Joe
I added 2 photos from this morning. Venus appeared at first as a great orange star, followed by a thin crescent moon that got lost in the blaze as the sun rose. I had to coax Saturn w/ some contrast enhancement to make it visible in the photo. Haleakala is such a GREAT place to watch the rising sun and to encounter the night sky.
A hui ho Rob
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Rob Ratkowski Photography <ratkwski@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
I added 2 photos from this morning. Venus appeared at first as a great orange star, followed by a thin crescent moon that got lost in the blaze as the sun rose.
Really well done on a tough shot. - Kurt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi Kurt It was a tough shot, didn't see Saturn till I put the files up on the screen, but I sure like being at the summit!! aloha Rob
--- Rob Ratkowski Photography <ratkwski@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
It was a tough shot, didn't see Saturn till I put the files up on the screen, but I sure like being at the summit!!
Chuck mentioned the ecliptic orientation of the Moon in another thread. It is also nicely shown in your photo - http://www.utahastronomy.com/view_photo.php?full=1&set_albumName=rob&id=eCre... A line between Mercury and Saturn defines the ecliptic. Saturn is just below the ecliptic. The Moon is about 3 1/2 lunar diameters off the ecliptic. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Rob Ratkowski Photography <ratkwski@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
It was a tough shot, . . .
P.S. - I'd take a 4 deg x 6 deg blow up (the Moon is 1/2 deg for measuring) showing the planets and the Moon and ship it off to APOD. - Kurt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060824/ap_on_sc/planet_mutiny_7 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com> wrote:
From here the skyglow was too bright for a photo, by the time the moon cleared the mountains.
The height of the Wasatsch Mtn.s and some clouds blocked it out in SLC. For this one, you really needed to get some altitude (like Rob did) so you can look down or at least level and across the dark horizon. - Kurt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Thanks for the interesting note, Rob. Will you be posting photos of the grouping? Yokwe yuk, Joe
--- Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com> wrote:
The moon a planetary body? Is there another planetary . . . Sorry Kurt, I couldn't resist! ;o)
Okay, a solar system body that's still bigger than three or four IAU planets.
BTW, the earthshine this AM was especially strong...I wonder what the earth's cloud-cover percentage was at the time, on the daylight hemisphere?
Earthshine on the Moon is the strongest just before and after new Moon (on the 23rd) - and not just because of the Moon's low illuminated fraction. The reason for this is the Moon is inclined in its orbit at about 6 degs from the Earth's equator. At new Moon and full Moon, the Moon moves crosses the ecliptic plane. Thus, relatively more sunlight reflected off the Earth directly hits the Moon. As we approach the equinoxes, Earthshine also increases because the Earth is crossing the ecliptic at the same time. My own preference is for Earthshine just before the new Moon in the early morning just after the autumnal equinox and just before the spring equinox. Earthshine has the most steely-blue color to it during it's early morning risings. But this occurs each month in the mornings before new Moon. The general public are more familiar with Earthshine a day or so after new Moon, when the Moon is rising in the west after sunset. Most people are awake then and they are more likely to see it. - Kurt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Canopus56 <canopus56@yahoo.com> wrote:
The reason for this is the Moon is inclined in its orbit at about 6 degs from the Earth's equator.
I know all that of course, but it still seemed brighter than an ecliptic alignment would account for- thus my pondering cloud cover.
when the Moon is rising in the west after sunset.
On Mars, maybe...not here! ;o) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com> wrote:
I know all that of course, but it still seemed brighter than an ecliptic alignment would account for - thus my pondering cloud cover.
Sorry for the misread. Don't know, but I don't feel a global cloud cover is a factor in the overall intensity of Earthshine. I feel it has more to do with the background brightness of the sky bringing out a better contrast and the relative Moon-Earth distance. Twilight is longer in the summer = less favorable contrast. The relative Moon-Earth distance for Earthshine is the inverse of the extraordinarily bright full Moon effect. But my RASC Observer's Handbook and MICA ephemeris is showing the Moon around 401,000 km distant on the 21st. That's closer to apogee than perigee. - Kurt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Considering the relative albedos of a mostly cloudless vs. cloud-covered hemisphere, I'd be willing to bet that at extremes it still has a greater effect on earthshine than distance. I'm moving on. --- Canopus56 <canopus56@yahoo.com> wrote:
The relative Moon-Earth distance for Earthshine is the inverse of the extraordinarily bright full Moon effect. But my RASC Observer's Handbook and MICA ephemeris is showing the Moon around 401,000 km distant on the 21st. That's closer to apogee than perigee.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Chuck Hards <chuckhards@yahoo.com> wrote:
I'm moving on.
See ya.
Considering the relative albedos of a mostly cloudless vs. cloud-covered hemisphere, I'd be willing to bet that at extremes it still has a greater effect on earthshine than distance.
It was a sufficiently cool question that I checked out the journal literature. Here are my notes and links for group archival purposes: Apparently, the relationship between Earthshine and the Earth's albedo wasn't looked at closely until recently as part of the study of global climate change. In 2003, a researcher at the CIT and Big Bear Solar Observatory developed an automated CCD camera system to measure the albedo of the Earth using Earthshine reflected off the Moon as a detector. Effectively Goode was using the Moon as a photographic big "grey" card. He mathematically compensated for changes in Earthshine from the phase and position of Moon and lunar topography - leaving only the Earth's albedo. Variations in Earthshine are well-correlated with the Earth's albedo. It looks like within a single year, variations in the Earth's albedo are around -+8%.
From 1985 to 2003, there was an annual average variation of +8% to -2%.
Goode used "daily cloud-cover data from Intellicast" to come up with an estimate of the daily global cloud cover. Goode, P. et al. 2003. Sunshine, Earthshine and Climate Change II. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2003JKAS...36S..83G Per Figure 2 - +-8% (within a single year) Earthshine project public ed. science info summary http://www.bbso.njit.edu/science_may28.html http://www.bbso.njit.edu/espr/sci_images/fig_watts_website.gif (annual variations - 1985-2003 - +10% to -2%) http://www.bbso.njit.edu/espr/sci_images/trycover3.jpg Big Bear Solar Observatory - Earthshine project http://www.bbso.njit.edu/Research/EarthShine/ http://www.bbso.njit.edu/ Palle, E. et al. 2003. Earthshine and the Earth's albedo 2. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2003JGRD.108vACL13P Thejll, P., Goode, P. 2002. Earthshine: A Proposal to Build an Automatic System for Observing Terrestrial Albedo. (abstract). http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2002EGSGA..27.4058T Qui, J. Goode, P. 2003. Earthshine and the Earth's albedo: 1. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2003JGRD.108vACL12Q Koonin, S.E. 1998. Earthshine and the Earth's Albedo. http://www.bbso.njit.edu/Research/EarthShine/espaper/earthshine_paper.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
participants (5)
-
Canopus56 -
Chuck Hards -
Joe Bauman -
Richard Tenney -
Rob Ratkowski Photography