Cold Fusion: It's not just for breakfast anymore
Pons & Flieshman may be owed the biggest apology since Galileo: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090324/ts_alt_afp/usscienceenergynuclear
Yes, I realize it's the same story, but the first was local. The second is essentially world-wide.
On 24 Mar 2009, at 18:40, Chuck Hards wrote:
Pons & Flieshman may be owed the biggest apology since Galileo:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090324/ts_alt_afp/usscienceenergynuclear
Cold fusion was a topic of conversation yesterday during the SPOC work party lunch. We agreed that regardless of what you call it, if one puts X energy in and gets X+1 out (and it's repeatable) it's something to look into. I also learned that one of the original SLASers, Jerry Montgomery (of Montgomery Observatory fame) has done a lot of study on the subject. I look forward to bending his ear at the next SLAS meeting. patrick
Isn't that what SLAS got out of volunteers yesterday. Work with no labor cost.
Anyway, Go Navy, I guess the Dept of Energy needs to reconsider their findings of a few years ago. IE: It was not worth persuing although the government appears to have persued it anyway. On 24 Mar 2009, at 18:40, Chuck Hards wrote:
Pons & Flieshman may be owed the biggest apology since Galileo:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090324/ts_alt_afp/usscienceenergynuclear
Cold fusion was a topic of conversation yesterday during the SPOC work party lunch. We agreed that regardless of what you call it, if one puts X energy in and gets X+1 out (and it's repeatable) it's something to look into.
I also learned that one of the original SLASers, Jerry Montgomery (of Montgomery Observatory fame) has done a lot of study on the subject. I look forward to bending his ear at the next SLAS meeting.
patrick
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
It's alchemy. On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:34 AM, <erikhansen@thebluezone.net> wrote:
Anyway, Go Navy, I guess the Dept of Energy needs to reconsider their findings of a few years ago. IE: It was not worth persuing although the government appears to have persued it anyway.
An announcement about cold fusion at a meeting of chemists in Salt Lake City? I wonder if this presentation wasn't originally scheduled for a week from tomorrow (Weds).
Chris, Good point. It wouldn't be the first time someone jumped the gun on the Cold Fusion Topic. Rodger C. Fry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris" <slas@2nerds.com> To: "Utah Astronomy" <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:29 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Cold Fusion: It's not just for breakfastanymore
An announcement about cold fusion at a meeting of chemists in Salt Lake City?
I wonder if this presentation wasn't originally scheduled for a week from tomorrow (Weds).
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php Visit the Wiki: http://www.utahastronomy.com
That's a lot of money wasted for an April Fools joke, if that's the case. On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Chris <slas@2nerds.com> wrote:
An announcement about cold fusion at a meeting of chemists in Salt Lake City?
I wonder if this presentation wasn't originally scheduled for a week from tomorrow (Weds).
participants (5)
-
Chris -
Chuck Hards -
erikhansen＠TheBlueZone.net -
Patrick Wiggins -
Rodger C. Fry