Hey All, Sorry, I did it again. Forgot to edit the subject. But since I woke up this morning and realized I had lost an hour due to DST, I will blame it on that. He he. Anyhow, please see the links from NASA and NOAA. Basically, the conclusions of both of these monumental science organizations are the same; global warming is being exacerbated by human activity. No graphs that hurt the eyes... pretty much all in plain English. These are the only sources I take into consideration regarding global warming. All other sources are just using the data provided by these government entities. Why would I believe some obscure researcher at Yale or wherever, when I can go right to the source? NASA, NOAA and IPCC are the ones recording this data. They have the satellite network, they have the infrastructure to gather this data. I would trust them to be able to interpret their own data. I would not trust an external researcher to over turn the government researchers' conclusions with their own data. Why would I? Why would anybody? That is not a scientific or logical option. Jon http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/global_warming_worldbook.html http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080619_climatereport.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html#q1