Re: [Utah-astronomy] Infromal Laser test pics
Interesting shots, Howard, thanks for posting them. That's pretty much what I expereinced when comparing my ComuterGeeks.com laser to both my Lucky Duck and my Beta. And like you, I have a twinge of buyer's remorse, because my Beta is brighter than the Lucky Duck- it really became more noticeable with NiMH batteries. I still want to do a more controlled test sometime soon, but my daughter's illness scuttled my time-off, and of course I was handed a huge contract last week that will preclude any free time for at least the next five or six weeks. It never fails, as soon as I schedule time-off, the stuff always hits the fan. But keep the faith, the weather is only going to get warmer! ;o) I have visions of a dozen or more bright laser beams simultaneously piercing the darkness! I am going to really try and make it to SPOC this Wednesday night for a training class on the 32", maybe you could meet me there for a mini-test? In a message dated 4/1/2007 4:58:57 PM Mountain Standard Time, sumoetx@yahoo.com writes: Hello everyone. I recieved my new 20mw Lucky duck laser on friday and was able to take a few comparative pictures of it side by side with the 5mw version I recieved a month ago. ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Chuck, Joe, thanks for the comments. Joe they are both Lucky Duck lasers, however the one on the left is the 20mw model, which looks practically the same as the 5mw version except for the exclusion of the green ' jasperlaser.com' logo that is on the 5mw version. I'll try to post a picture of them both soon. Chuck I'd love to do a test with you and your lasers, but I work evenings (a true torture for an astronomy enthusiast I assure you) We'll get it done someday though,I too enjoy the thought of dozens of lasers streaming into the darkness, that'd be a great picture. My offer to leave it with you still stands. I did want to ask you what 'MaH' your NiMH batteries are?? I just picked up a fresh batch of 1000MaH NiMHs, I'll let you know if I notice any difference between those, the lithiums, and alkalines. Just to add my dissapointment with the labeling practices of the industry, I've read quite a few message boards about green lasers and their lack of reliable standards concerning labeling, many companies raise the Mw rating when most is actually invisible IR wavelengths, or the infamous 'Optimized' rating. I have the feeling that alot of people have bought alot of lasers looking for the brightest laser to only find that it's the same or worse than what they already had. Sorry Chuck! Hey there's always Ebay, or a generous donation to an elementary science teacher to point out constellations. I hope your daughter's doing better! Oh yes just one more point, just to consolidate the other recent posts, and to echo Chucks statement. Yahoo is the problem, I recently subscribed with my Gmail account and it works great, most messages have been received within seconds! Thanks! Howard
participants (2)
-
cmh856@aol.com -
Howard Jackman