But see, Paul, you are playing semantic games, just like the planet definers. The definition of H you quote is within the framework of a larger Periodic Table which was rejected in the original premise, thus is heresey. Repent while there is still time. Hopefully the tinder is wet. --- Paul Gettings <gettings@mines.utah.edu> wrote:
On 11-May-04 13:56, Chuck Hards wrote:
Deuterium. Tritium. Hydrogen with neutrons. Neither of which are H; H is defined by one proton, one electron, no neutrons. You have already added 2 elements to your scheme, and you haven't even moved in charge! Have you done the math to make sure the heavy trans-uranic elements can be built using integer linear combinations of 1H, 2H, and 3H? And what would that do to the measured rations of 1H:2H:3H? :)
-- Casseroled cliche #6: Two heads are soon parted
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Visit the Photo Gallery: http://www.utahastronomy.com
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover