Hi David, sorry I'm so late getting back to this. I only check this email address very sporadically. I guess it's been nearly a week. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:55 PM, David Rankin <David@rankinstudio.com> wrote:
I see you talking about how the brain manufactures color, and I'm talking about how we experience it, and reproduce it. All the same stuff in the end.
Yes, that is what I was talking about. But no, I don't recall you specifically talking about how we "experience" it in the same context as I. Clearly you think you did, so we don't have enough common ground to continue. I still see us as talking about 2 different subjects, with some things in common, but not 2 discussions that should be held together.
But PLEASE DONT reply in-depth because I can't stay as involved in the discussion as you deserve. It might be weeks before I check this address again. As it is, there are nearly 30 list messages from the last couple of weeks I don't currently have time to read. What I apparently didn't describe adequately is that it's not Chuck's Theorum, it's accepted fact. As I said, I don't care one way or the other who understands and who doesn't, I just thought I'd raise an admittedly very esoteric point. The techies among us are probably prone to dismiss it as a distraction since it's really a discussion of the psychology of perception, not physics, astronomy, or engineering. I've already spent way more time than I should have trying to explain something I have no stake in. My sincere apologies, I'm sure I disappoint many of you as someone to hold a discussion with. Merry Christmas!