28 Dec
2010
28 Dec
'10
1:31 p.m.
I and many others on this list were taken aback 11 years ago when so many people, including supposedly learned people in the media, kept talking about the decade/century/millennia ending at the end of 1999. So imagine my surprise when lately I've been hearing in the same media about the current decade ending the end of this month. Apparently I'm not the only one feeling that way as evidenced by this Letter to the Editor in today's Tribune: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/opinion/50943106-82/decade-2000-century-2001.ht... While I agree with the writer, I'm wondering if maybe rather than criticizing, he should have complemented them for finally getting it right. Cheers, patrick :)