Thanks, Chris, I'll catch-up to it as time permits. But I've heard the "cherry-picking" argument by both sides, and often. One can just as easily, judging by the press, come to the conclusion that neither side has done good science. We always seem to return to demonization of one's opponents, unfortunately. We need to let scientific peer-review steer the course- and yes there will be dissenters even in that venue. Ultimately, it's moral issue. Even if the planet can absorb a certain amount of man-made pollution, should we pollute? Like tossing-out an empty soda can in the woods- the eco-system won't collapse, but is it the right thing to do? --- slas@2nerds.com wrote:
Hi Chuck, It's unfortunate that you don't have time to review the article posted at the beginning of this thread. One of the theses of that article is that the supposed recent unprecedented rise in global temperature simply does not exist.
____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! http://www.LowerMyBills.com/lre