Kurt, I suspect that most everyone has had their say on this topic. We've got a pretty good idea of everyone's general position, and I suspect that no one is particularly persuadable--at least in the short term. I've recently read a couple of David Berlinski's articles (he's the poster boy scientist for the ID crowd) and found him long on polemics and awfully short on science. If ID enthusiasts are actually going to present a scientific basis to their argument, I think we'll have to wait for someone more capable. Michael On Aug 14, 2005, at 6:16 PM, Canopus56 wrote:
--- Richard Tenney <retenney@yahoo.com> wrote:
Excellent post, . . .
Other options for continuing this discussion (if that's what the list wants to do as a group) would be:
1) To better define exactly what the theory of intelligent design is that its proponents want to be taught in Utah secondary public schools, or, etc, etc.