Warning: those bored by the debate, please delete this note. Absolutely, no offense, Tyler! And again, I am sorry I ever was so misguided as to get rude with people I truly do like. Yours is a good, reasoned argument and may well be the correct explanation. But I'm baffled that what most concede is a small temperature change could cause all this chaos. What if there is a different scenario? Let me propose an alternative: Let's assume Mr. Gettings is correct and the temperature change was something like .5 degree C. in 200 years. Even assuming it's our doing, that is not much of a contribution by humans, and we haven't been industrialized longer than that. But for the sake of argument, let's further assume it isn't human-caused, and that 0.5 degrees C. per 200 years is a fairly steady temperature increase. If we were to project that backward 10,000 years, when the last ice age was about to end, that would give us 25 degrees C. in that period. Does today's temperature minus 25 degrees C. seem a likely average temperature during the last ice age? We know the various ice ages had much colder temperatures and that they did end. Why did they end? Maybe volcanism, maybe a hot solar cycle, maybe some perturbation in Earth's orbit -- who knows? But several times, something changed and they did end. What if we are at the tail end of that change? In other words, we're still exiting the last big ice age. Earth's cycles could be so slow they are hard to detect from our short perspective. If so, is it unreasonable to assume that maybe the ice caps need generally much colder conditions than in the last 200 years in order to maintain themselves? What if the retreat of the ice in Greenland is part of the retreat of the ice cap that once covered northern North America? What if ice caps passed some temperature tipping point long ago and are simply continuing to thaw? Is that such a ridiculous idea? Just for fun, I checked the average temperature in New York, an area that was under ice 10,000 years ago. In July the 24-hour average temperature for Central Park is 75.6 degrees F., or 24.2 degrees C. Take away 25 degrees C. and you get just under 0 C., or just below freezing. Is that reasonable for an average 24-hour period in July in New York during the ice age? Seems reasonable, if not too warm. I agree that our release of CO and CO2 may be extraordinary (though I still think volcanoes could likely be a far bigger source). Does that translate into a temperature increase? How do you explain the fact that the ice caps are melting without any high temperature rise? Maybe air pollution is a separate issue, something that has not yet contributed significantly to global warming. A lot of the problem with forests dying apparently is acid rain, which is terrible but, as far as I know, not a contributor to global warming. To answer the question, why not do something even if we don't know that it will help? (I'm paraphrasing.) Every tax dollar you slap on gas in a possibly-misguided attempt to stop global warming is a dollar out of everyone's pockets. It would damage commerce. People who are scraping by and putting aside everything they can to send their children to college may find themselves unable to pay tuition. Or buy food that has a higher shipping cost. I remember when a new tax was placed on 2nd class postage, or whatever it was that applied to magazines, and it wiped out a lot of fine weeklies like Life Magazine. What difference would another few cents make? Plenty. Anyway, I don't mean to belabor the subject, but I think there are two sides to it. I don't think global warming is as cut-and-dried as many believe. I want to keep an open mind but I see a great deal of propaganda -- like Al Gore claiming global warming has spawned terrible hurricanes. A weather scientist I interviewed said that is untrue. If we believe Al Gore, this year's hurricane season was even worse than last year's -- was it? Best wishes, Joe