It was 1/200 at f/14 at 1600 ISO -- or so I think. I changed the ISO sometime during the series so I'm not sure. -- Joe ------------------------------ On Thu, May 3, 2012 2:09 PM MDT Brent Watson wrote:
Joe, What were the exposure details of your nice solar image that youo just posted? Thanks, Brent
From: Brent Watson <brentjwatson@yahoo.com> To: Utah Astronomy <utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Solar glasses
Erik, There are a lot of folks who are very concerned about damage to their cameras from the sun. I have a question though. When using their cameras for noraml photography, how many times do they catch the sun in the image and yet no damage occurs? The next comment would be that eclipse photography is different because the sun s larger and therefore covers a bigger portion of the shutter/image sensor. It is the same sun, but now the same amount of energy is spread across a larger area so the energy per area is less by the factor of the image size squared, or the ratio of the focal _______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
Send messages to the list to Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com
The Utah-Astronomy mailing list is not affiliated with any astronomy club.
To unsubscribe go to: http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy Then enter your email address in the space provided and click on "Unsubscribe or edit options".