Thanks - I obviously didn't look that far. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Hanks [mailto:hanksdc@plug.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:26 AM To: 'utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com' Subject: RE: [Utah-astronomy] Columbia attachment test I don't think it would be a hoax, as you can find the PDF from NASA's site: http://www.nasa.gov/columbia/COL_landgear_email_030212.html Click on the link 'Read text of email' -- Dan Hanks On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Kim Hyatt wrote:
Brent, do we know if this is genuine? Could this be an elaborate hoax?
-----Original Message----- From: David L Bennett [mailto:dlbennett@mac.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:20 AM To: utah-astronomy@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [Utah-astronomy] Columbia attachment test
Thanks Brent for posting the pdf about the potential gear breach concerns. Very very interesting and frightening, especially the forwarded statement; "looks like they believe all has been addressed..."
Dave
On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 09:20 PM, Brent Watson wrote:
I've been accumulating some good info on the Columbia disaster, and thought I'd share it. This is a test. Here is an attachment you can look at. It is purported to be an internal NASA memo written the day before the re-entry. Let's see if it makes it through the server. If so, I'll send a couple more items.
Brent
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy
_______________________________________________ Utah-Astronomy mailing list Utah-Astronomy@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/utah-astronomy