RE: [USR-TC] HELP: Lightning HiPerDSP
We've been trying to... but some of the wording is different, and it's different than the TelCo's wording again, so they're not a lot of help on knowing how our equipment should be set. Are you saying that the eAndMTypeII is the same as linkEMImmediateStart? On 9/5/02 12:38 PM, USR-TC@MAILMAN.XMISSION.COM wrote to SUPPORT: -> Try changing the setting on the DSP DialTrnkType: loopStart to EAndM Type II -> -> At the very least you should configure the DSP to these same settings that -> worked for you on your other gear. -> -> Todd -> -> -----Original Message----- -> From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com -> [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of -> support@inet2000.com -> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:04 PM -> To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com -> Subject: Re: [USR-TC] HELP: Lightning HiPerDSP -> -> -> The other equipment has some differences and some different wording for the -> settins. It lists.... -> -> Line Type : dsx1ESF -> Coding : dsx1B8ZS -> RecEqualiz: linkRxEqualizerOff -> LineBuildOut: t1Pulse0dB -> fd1: : Ansi-T1-403 -> Mode: : robbedBit -> robbedbitprotocal: linkEMImmediateStart -> MessageOrientedSwitchType: ni1 -> NFAS InterfaceID: 0 -> NFAS Primary WAN: 1 -> Loobackconfig: NoLoop -> SendCode: SendNoCode -> -> So, as far as we can tell, the settins are the same on everything they cross -> over on... We're just really stumped here. -> -> Are there settings in the ARC or NMC that can cause a dead air answer? -> -> On 9/5/02 11:57 AM, USR-TC@MAILMAN.XMISSION.COM wrote to SUPPORT: -> -> -> -> -> > We get the same results on two different DSP cards, yet the T1 works on -> our -> -> > old backup equipment, so it must be OK. -> -> Why not get the proper line settings from the old equipment and use -> those? -> -> -- -> -> Lewis Bergman -> -> Texas Communications -> -> 4309 Maple St. -> -> Abilene, TX 79602-8044 -> -> 915-695-6962 ext 115 -> -> -> -> _______________________________________________ -> -> USR-TC mailing list -> -> USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com -> -> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc -> -> -> -> -> _______________________________________________ -> USR-TC mailing list -> USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com -> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc -> -> -> -> -> _______________________________________________ -> USR-TC mailing list -> USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com -> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
This is what your old working card had: Line Type : dsx1ESF Coding : dsx1B8ZS RecEqualiz: linkRxEqualizerOff LineBuildOut: t1Pulse0dB fd1: : Ansi-T1-403 Mode: : robbedBit robbedbitprotocal: linkEMImmediateStart MessageOrientedSwitchType: ni1 NFAS InterfaceID: 0 NFAS Primary WAN: 1 Loobackconfig: NoLoop SendCode: SendNoCode This is what I would try on the DSP: Framing: dsx1ESF Line Code: dsx1B8ZS Loopback config: dsx1NoLoop Signal Mode: robbedBit Transmit Clock Source: loopTiming NIC Type: LongHaul Response to remote loopback: ignore Jitter atten: attenJitterOnRcvr Transmit Line Build Out: dB0pt0 dial in address: no address dial in /out trunk start signal: immediate ack wink: disabled dial in /out trunk type: eAndMTypeII primary switch type: ni2 (shouldn't matter for robbed bit though) tone type: dtmf Number of DTMF tones: 4 send code: dsx1sendnoc Not sure why they have NFAS settings listed for you. Under NFAS you should be set to FAS and so should the telco. Todd -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of support@inet2000.com Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:42 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] HELP: Lightning HiPerDSP We've been trying to... but some of the wording is different, and it's different than the TelCo's wording again, so they're not a lot of help on knowing how our equipment should be set. Are you saying that the eAndMTypeII is the same as linkEMImmediateStart? On 9/5/02 12:38 PM, USR-TC@MAILMAN.XMISSION.COM wrote to SUPPORT: -> Try changing the setting on the DSP DialTrnkType: loopStart to EAndM Type II -> -> At the very least you should configure the DSP to these same settings that -> worked for you on your other gear. -> -> Todd -> -> -----Original Message----- -> From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com -> [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of -> support@inet2000.com -> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:04 PM -> To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com -> Subject: Re: [USR-TC] HELP: Lightning HiPerDSP -> -> -> The other equipment has some differences and some different wording for the -> settins. It lists.... -> -> Line Type : dsx1ESF -> Coding : dsx1B8ZS -> RecEqualiz: linkRxEqualizerOff -> LineBuildOut: t1Pulse0dB -> fd1: : Ansi-T1-403 -> Mode: : robbedBit -> robbedbitprotocal: linkEMImmediateStart -> MessageOrientedSwitchType: ni1 -> NFAS InterfaceID: 0 -> NFAS Primary WAN: 1 -> Loobackconfig: NoLoop -> SendCode: SendNoCode -> -> So, as far as we can tell, the settins are the same on everything they cross -> over on... We're just really stumped here. -> -> Are there settings in the ARC or NMC that can cause a dead air answer? -> -> On 9/5/02 11:57 AM, USR-TC@MAILMAN.XMISSION.COM wrote to SUPPORT: -> -> -> -> -> > We get the same results on two different DSP cards, yet the T1 works on -> our -> -> > old backup equipment, so it must be OK. -> -> Why not get the proper line settings from the old equipment and use -> those? -> -> -- -> -> Lewis Bergman -> -> Texas Communications -> -> 4309 Maple St. -> -> Abilene, TX 79602-8044 -> -> 915-695-6962 ext 115 -> -> -> -> _______________________________________________ -> -> USR-TC mailing list -> -> USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com -> -> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc -> -> -> -> -> _______________________________________________ -> USR-TC mailing list -> USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com -> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc -> -> -> -> -> _______________________________________________ -> USR-TC mailing list -> USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com -> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
Gentlemen, We have run into a problem here. Recently we upgraded to the newer code on our DSP's. Code 3.5.105 And at the same time (or nearly there) we changed from CT1's to PRI's Almost everything is work ing quite well. No big change in the normal amount of failed calls and no new modem types that will not connect. Except a handfull of Mac's -- Still collecting info but it seems that the iMac's are the problems. Tradionally we have never had as much luck with our Mac customers as we have had with our PC customers. And certainly the competition, who's still running (I think) PM gear is the preferred Mac guy around here. Anyone had this same problem? Is there a fix for this? Terry
participants (3)
-
support＠inet2000.com -
Terry Kennedy -
Todd Bertolozzi