Make your V92 settings in Template 1. make sure Template 1 is assigned to all modems on a given card. Save Template 1 Config to nVRAM Refresh Template 1 Config Channels Save Both T1/E1 and modems to NVRAM Hardware Reset Your V.92 settings will stay if you do it this way. - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Casen [mailto:Xeen@Aros.Net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:31 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code I've been running v92 on two HiperDSP's using 3.5.105 as well. Only problem I've noticed is that I can't seem to get the v92 configurations to stay enabled. I've saved T1/Modem to NVRAM, but I'll check a couple weeks later and see it all disabled again. On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 14:04, Joel - Fox Computers wrote:
3.5.105 is older. I believe it's on the CommWorks web site or from whereever you get your support.
Regardless of code version, I've been running V.92 since June '02 and no complaints from anyone.
-----Original Message----- From: VCI Help Desk [mailto:admin@vci.net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:55 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Where did you get 3.5.105? The most recent version I can find on Commworks is 3.5.109
Do your V90 & V34 customers have any problems with the V92 code?
Bill Dunn
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel - Fox Computers" <jfox@foxcomputers.com> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:27 PM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Sounds more like a bad card than bad code. I ran 3.5.109 for several weeks without any problem like that.
I did have one customer that started getting lost-carrier disconnects really bad. In 2 months prior, he had not had a single disconnect, but at the exact time I upgraded from 3.5.105 to 3.5.109 he started having problems. For that reason, I just got all my cards re-flashed to 3.5.105 and his problems are gone now. We are running V.92 and the customer has a V.92 modem, so I don't know if the issue was directly related to V92 or not, but I may have to stay at 3.5.105 until something better comes along.
- Joel
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc -- Casen ArosNet Systems Administration
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
How do I make sure Template 1 is assigned to all modems on the card? Thanks Timothy C. Bohen CMSInter.Net LLC / Crystal MicroSystems LLC =========================================== web : www.cmsinter.net email: tim@cmsinter.net phone: 989.235.5100 x222 fax : 989.235.5151 -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Joel - Fox Computers Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:05 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code Make your V92 settings in Template 1. make sure Template 1 is assigned to all modems on a given card. Save Template 1 Config to nVRAM Refresh Template 1 Config Channels Save Both T1/E1 and modems to NVRAM Hardware Reset Your V.92 settings will stay if you do it this way. - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Casen [mailto:Xeen@Aros.Net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:31 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code I've been running v92 on two HiperDSP's using 3.5.105 as well. Only problem I've noticed is that I can't seem to get the v92 configurations to stay enabled. I've saved T1/Modem to NVRAM, but I'll check a couple weeks later and see it all disabled again. On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 14:04, Joel - Fox Computers wrote:
3.5.105 is older. I believe it's on the CommWorks web site or from whereever you get your support.
Regardless of code version, I've been running V.92 since June '02 and no complaints from anyone.
-----Original Message----- From: VCI Help Desk [mailto:admin@vci.net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:55 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Where did you get 3.5.105? The most recent version I can find on Commworks is 3.5.109
Do your V90 & V34 customers have any problems with the V92 code?
Bill Dunn
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel - Fox Computers" <jfox@foxcomputers.com> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:27 PM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Sounds more like a bad card than bad code. I ran 3.5.109 for several weeks without any problem like that.
I did have one customer that started getting lost-carrier disconnects really bad. In 2 months prior, he had not had a single disconnect, but at the exact time I upgraded from 3.5.105 to 3.5.109 he started having problems. For that reason, I just got all my cards re-flashed to 3.5.105 and his problems are gone now. We are running V.92 and the customer has a V.92 modem, so I don't know if the issue was directly related to V92 or not, but I may have to stay at 3.5.105 until something better comes along.
- Joel
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc -- Casen ArosNet Systems Administration
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
Tim, In TCM, select the card, and then select CONFIGURE/HIPER DSP MAPPING. Seth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Timothy C. Bohen" <Tim@CMSInter.Net> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:41 AM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
How do I make sure Template 1 is assigned to all modems on the card?
Thanks
Timothy C. Bohen CMSInter.Net LLC / Crystal MicroSystems LLC =========================================== web : www.cmsinter.net email: tim@cmsinter.net phone: 989.235.5100 x222 fax : 989.235.5151
-----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Joel - Fox Computers Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:05 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Make your V92 settings in Template 1. make sure Template 1 is assigned to all modems on a given card.
Save Template 1 Config to nVRAM Refresh Template 1 Config Channels Save Both T1/E1 and modems to NVRAM Hardware Reset
Your V.92 settings will stay if you do it this way.
- Joel
-----Original Message----- From: Casen [mailto:Xeen@Aros.Net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:31 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
I've been running v92 on two HiperDSP's using 3.5.105 as well. Only problem I've noticed is that I can't seem to get the v92 configurations to stay enabled. I've saved T1/Modem to NVRAM, but I'll check a couple weeks later and see it all disabled again.
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 14:04, Joel - Fox Computers wrote:
3.5.105 is older. I believe it's on the CommWorks web site or from whereever you get your support.
Regardless of code version, I've been running V.92 since June '02 and no complaints from anyone.
-----Original Message----- From: VCI Help Desk [mailto:admin@vci.net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:55 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Where did you get 3.5.105? The most recent version I can find on Commworks is 3.5.109
Do your V90 & V34 customers have any problems with the V92 code?
Bill Dunn
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel - Fox Computers" <jfox@foxcomputers.com> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:27 PM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Sounds more like a bad card than bad code. I ran 3.5.109 for several weeks without any problem like that.
I did have one customer that started getting lost-carrier disconnects really bad. In 2 months prior, he had not had a single disconnect, but at the exact time I upgraded from 3.5.105 to 3.5.109 he started having problems. For that reason, I just got all my cards re-flashed to 3.5.105 and his problems are gone now. We are running V.92 and the customer has a V.92 modem, so I don't know if the issue was directly related to V92 or not, but I may have to stay at 3.5.105 until something better comes along.
- Joel
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc -- Casen ArosNet Systems Administration
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
participants (3)
-
Joel - Fox Computers -
Seth Jacobs -
Timothy C. Bohen