3.5.105 is older. I believe it's on the CommWorks web site or from whereever you get your support. Regardless of code version, I've been running V.92 since June '02 and no complaints from anyone. -----Original Message----- From: VCI Help Desk [mailto:admin@vci.net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:55 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code Where did you get 3.5.105? The most recent version I can find on Commworks is 3.5.109 Do your V90 & V34 customers have any problems with the V92 code? Bill Dunn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel - Fox Computers" <jfox@foxcomputers.com> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:27 PM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code Sounds more like a bad card than bad code. I ran 3.5.109 for several weeks without any problem like that. I did have one customer that started getting lost-carrier disconnects really bad. In 2 months prior, he had not had a single disconnect, but at the exact time I upgraded from 3.5.105 to 3.5.109 he started having problems. For that reason, I just got all my cards re-flashed to 3.5.105 and his problems are gone now. We are running V.92 and the customer has a V.92 modem, so I don't know if the issue was directly related to V92 or not, but I may have to stay at 3.5.105 until something better comes along. - Joel _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
I've been running v92 on two HiperDSP's using 3.5.105 as well. Only problem I've noticed is that I can't seem to get the v92 configurations to stay enabled. I've saved T1/Modem to NVRAM, but I'll check a couple weeks later and see it all disabled again. On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 14:04, Joel - Fox Computers wrote:
3.5.105 is older. I believe it's on the CommWorks web site or from whereever you get your support.
Regardless of code version, I've been running V.92 since June '02 and no complaints from anyone.
-----Original Message----- From: VCI Help Desk [mailto:admin@vci.net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:55 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Where did you get 3.5.105? The most recent version I can find on Commworks is 3.5.109
Do your V90 & V34 customers have any problems with the V92 code?
Bill Dunn
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel - Fox Computers" <jfox@foxcomputers.com> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:27 PM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Sounds more like a bad card than bad code. I ran 3.5.109 for several weeks without any problem like that.
I did have one customer that started getting lost-carrier disconnects really bad. In 2 months prior, he had not had a single disconnect, but at the exact time I upgraded from 3.5.105 to 3.5.109 he started having problems. For that reason, I just got all my cards re-flashed to 3.5.105 and his problems are gone now. We are running V.92 and the customer has a V.92 modem, so I don't know if the issue was directly related to V92 or not, but I may have to stay at 3.5.105 until something better comes along.
- Joel
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc -- Casen ArosNet Systems Administration
Ditto... it just turns off with .109 and .105 DSP code -- Paul Farber Farber Technology farber@admin.f-tech.net Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On 27 Feb 2003, Casen wrote:
I've been running v92 on two HiperDSP's using 3.5.105 as well. Only problem I've noticed is that I can't seem to get the v92 configurations to stay enabled. I've saved T1/Modem to NVRAM, but I'll check a couple weeks later and see it all disabled again.
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 14:04, Joel - Fox Computers wrote:
3.5.105 is older. I believe it's on the CommWorks web site or from whereever you get your support.
Regardless of code version, I've been running V.92 since June '02 and no complaints from anyone.
-----Original Message----- From: VCI Help Desk [mailto:admin@vci.net] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:55 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Where did you get 3.5.105? The most recent version I can find on Commworks is 3.5.109
Do your V90 & V34 customers have any problems with the V92 code?
Bill Dunn
----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel - Fox Computers" <jfox@foxcomputers.com> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:27 PM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 DSP code
Sounds more like a bad card than bad code. I ran 3.5.109 for several weeks without any problem like that.
I did have one customer that started getting lost-carrier disconnects really bad. In 2 months prior, he had not had a single disconnect, but at the exact time I upgraded from 3.5.105 to 3.5.109 he started having problems. For that reason, I just got all my cards re-flashed to 3.5.105 and his problems are gone now. We are running V.92 and the customer has a V.92 modem, so I don't know if the issue was directly related to V92 or not, but I may have to stay at 3.5.105 until something better comes along.
- Joel
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
participants (3)
-
Casen -
Joel - Fox Computers -
Paul Farber