(usr-tc) DSPCode 2.0.51
Is this code only recommended for hardware revisions .54 and .55 only? I have .49 and was thinking of moving to the 2.0.51 from the 2.0.60 since I do not see too many improvements. And is this compatible with NMC 6.1.17 and ARC 4.1.22? It seems to be getting more difficult to keep these things straight. -Cheryl Johnson SEI Data Network Services, Inc. A Division of SEI Communications
2.0.51 is good for all DSP's On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Cheryl Johnson wrote:
Is this code only recommended for hardware revisions .54 and .55 only? I have .49 and was thinking of moving to the 2.0.51 from the 2.0.60 since I do not see too many improvements. And is this compatible with NMC 6.1.17 and ARC 4.1.22? It seems to be getting more difficult to keep these things straight.
-Cheryl Johnson SEI Data Network Services, Inc. A Division of SEI Communications
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Brian wrote:
2.0.51 is good for all DSP's
How's it compare to 2.0.81? Better, worse, indifferent? Charles
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Cheryl Johnson wrote:
Is this code only recommended for hardware revisions .54 and .55 only? I have .49 and was thinking of moving to the 2.0.51 from the 2.0.60 since I do not see too many improvements. And is this compatible with NMC 6.1.17 and ARC 4.1.22? It seems to be getting more difficult to keep these things straight.
-Cheryl Johnson SEI Data Network Services, Inc. A Division of SEI Communications
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
I _think_ I've some improvement in disconnects running 2.0.51. Don't know about Rockwell improvements. I had a USR Sportster 56K _non_ winmodem having handsaking problems this morning on 2.0.81 and 2.0.19. He hit a 2.0.51 card and all was well. Could have been a co-inki-dink. -- Scot ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 4:08 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) DSPCode 2.0.51
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Brian wrote:
2.0.51 is good for all DSP's
How's it compare to 2.0.81? Better, worse, indifferent?
Charles
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Cheryl Johnson wrote:
Is this code only recommended for hardware revisions .54 and .55 only? I have .49 and was thinking of moving to the 2.0.51 from the 2.0.60 since I do not see too many improvements. And is this compatible with NMC 6.1.17 and ARC 4.1.22? It seems to be getting more difficult to keep these things straight.
-Cheryl Johnson SEI Data Network Services, Inc. A Division of SEI Communications
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
I have seen more connection success rate with 2.0.51. I use to get 94-98% connection success overall for all calls to a chassis for a 24 hour period. I now see more like 96-98% average. On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Brian wrote:
2.0.51 is good for all DSP's
How's it compare to 2.0.81? Better, worse, indifferent?
Charles
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Cheryl Johnson wrote:
Is this code only recommended for hardware revisions .54 and .55 only? I have .49 and was thinking of moving to the 2.0.51 from the 2.0.60 since I do not see too many improvements. And is this compatible with NMC 6.1.17 and ARC 4.1.22? It seems to be getting more difficult to keep these things straight.
-Cheryl Johnson SEI Data Network Services, Inc. A Division of SEI Communications
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
We have seen an increase in calls to our help desk when we flashed 2.0.51 on all our DSP's. Older 28.8 modems were having trouble connecting (including USR's) We flashed back to 2.0.60. Did anyone else experience this?? John Verreault AEI Internet
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 4:08 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) DSPCode 2.0.51
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Brian wrote:
2.0.51 is good for all DSP's
How's it compare to 2.0.81? Better, worse, indifferent?
Charles
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Cheryl Johnson wrote:
Is this code only recommended for hardware revisions .54 and .55 only? I have .49 and was thinking of moving to the 2.0.51 from the 2.0.60 since I do not see too many improvements. And is this compatible with NMC 6.1.17 and ARC 4.1.22? It seems to be getting more difficult to keep these things straight.
-Cheryl Johnson SEI Data Network Services, Inc. A Division of SEI Communications
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
We saw some of that when we load 2.0.60, but the problem was offset by a reduced number of problems with V90/KFlex modems attempting to connect. It used to be a continuous battle, now it is just a nuisance. We only had a few 28.8 connections that failed and it is my recollection that tech support got them going somehow. Mark Thornton San Marcos Internet, Inc. 512-393-5300 ----- Original Message ----- From: John Verreault <verreaul@aei.ca> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 9:48 AM Subject: RE: (usr-tc) DSPCode 2.0.51
We have seen an increase in calls to our help desk when we flashed 2.0.51 on all our DSP's.
Older 28.8 modems were having trouble connecting (including USR's)
We flashed back to 2.0.60.
Did anyone else experience this??
John Verreault AEI Internet
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 4:08 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) DSPCode 2.0.51
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Brian wrote:
2.0.51 is good for all DSP's
How's it compare to 2.0.81? Better, worse, indifferent?
Charles
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Cheryl Johnson wrote:
Is this code only recommended for hardware revisions .54 and .55 only? I have .49 and was thinking of moving to the 2.0.51 from the 2.0.60 since I do not see too many improvements. And is this compatible with NMC 6.1.17 and ARC 4.1.22? It seems to be getting more difficult to keep these things straight.
-Cheryl Johnson SEI Data Network Services, Inc. A Division of SEI Communications
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
participants (6)
-
Brian -
Charles Sprickman -
Cheryl Johnson -
John Verreault -
Mark Thornton -
Scot Desort