Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92 This is an email from Amit Tiwari, Director of Product Management from Commworks. -----Original Message----- From: Amit_Tiwari@3com.com [SMTP:Amit_Tiwari@3com.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 PM To: Shawn Brown Subject: V.92 statement i) V.92 will be supported on the TC 1000 chassis. ii) V.92 will be supported via a SOFTWARE upgrade SKU on both the 24 port HDSP modem and the 96 port modem. Thanks, Amit Tiwari Director, Product Management, Enhanced Data Systems, CommWorks, a 3Com Company Thanks, Shawn Brown Founder Source Technology
-----Original Message----- From: CJ [SMTP:netadmin@seidata.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money.....
And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better.
Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed.
The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs.
Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes.
CJ
-----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As far
as I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dale Hege wrote:
The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon that
v.92
will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the chassis with fan tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 Enhanced chassis. :(
Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards do not support V.92.
-Ron
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
Dear Shawn, Many thanks for the update re v.92. It IS appreciated! :) Seth Jacobs OnRamp113 A TC1000 HyperDSP/24 owner ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Brown" <sbrown@source-t.com> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: RE: (usr-tc) V.92
Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92 This is an email from Amit Tiwari, Director of Product Management from Commworks.
-----Original Message----- From: Amit_Tiwari@3com.com [SMTP:Amit_Tiwari@3com.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 PM To: Shawn Brown Subject: V.92 statement
i) V.92 will be supported on the TC 1000 chassis. ii) V.92 will be supported via a SOFTWARE upgrade SKU on both the 24 port HDSP modem and the 96 port modem.
Thanks, Amit Tiwari Director, Product Management, Enhanced Data Systems, CommWorks, a 3Com Company
Thanks, Shawn Brown Founder Source Technology
-----Original Message----- From: CJ [SMTP:netadmin@seidata.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money.....
And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better.
Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed.
The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs.
Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes.
CJ
-----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As
far as I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dale Hege wrote:
The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon
that v.92
will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the chassis with fan tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 Enhanced chassis. :(
Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards do not support V.92.
-Ron
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
I see all the Hoop-al about the V.92,..as far as i understand it will not really be a great benefit to the ISP/dial-up seller,.. will it? what i understand is it will be a 44k-48k up and 56k to the client, whereas most of you are now 33.6 up and 56k to client,.. now i ask where is the big advantage? Now for a unit/modem pool in service as a dial up to a business i can see a slight benefit, but for internet access ?? can someone straighten me out if i am way off base please. albert.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Seth Jacobs Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:46 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dear Shawn,
Many thanks for the update re v.92. It IS appreciated! :)
Seth Jacobs OnRamp113 A TC1000 HyperDSP/24 owner
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Brown" <sbrown@source-t.com> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: RE: (usr-tc) V.92
Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92 This is an email from Amit Tiwari, Director of Product Management from Commworks.
-----Original Message----- From: Amit_Tiwari@3com.com [SMTP:Amit_Tiwari@3com.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 PM To: Shawn Brown Subject: V.92 statement
i) V.92 will be supported on the TC 1000 chassis. ii) V.92 will be supported via a SOFTWARE upgrade SKU on both the 24 port HDSP modem and the 96 port modem.
Thanks, Amit Tiwari Director, Product Management, Enhanced Data Systems, CommWorks, a 3Com Company
Thanks, Shawn Brown Founder Source Technology
-----Original Message----- From: CJ [SMTP:netadmin@seidata.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money.....
And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better.
Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed.
The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs.
Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes.
CJ
-----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As
far as I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dale Hege wrote: > > The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon that v.92 > will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the chassis with fan > tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 > Enhanced chassis. :(
Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards do not support V.92.
-Ron
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
albert wrote:
I see all the Hoop-al about the V.92,..as far as i understand it will not really be a great benefit to the ISP/dial-up seller,.. will it?
what i understand is it will be a 44k-48k up and 56k to the client, whereas most of you are now 33.6 up and 56k to client,.. now i ask where is the big advantage?
Now for a unit/modem pool in service as a dial up to a business i can see a slight benefit, but for internet access ??
can someone straighten me out if i am way off base please.
The way I see it is the customer is going to call, "I have a new V.92 modem, do you support V.92?" Saying "Yes" and not actually having V.92 modems will cause ill will. To try to tell them V.92 is worthless, is well, worthless. This is the upgrade game, and let's play it to our advantage. Anyone with PM3's out there can't upgrade either and are being forced to set up new pools for V.92 or do a fork lift upgrade. I spent the $$ a few years ago to get rid of all my quads. I think it didn't cost me much since all I had to do is buy HiPer DSP cards and they would upgrade my Quads to HiPer DSP's for free. Buy two DSP cards and they'd upgrade 48 modems for free.. I also got rid of my Netserver card as well. Since I was growing fairly quickly at the time and buying hardware anyway, it really didn't cost me a cent outside the cost of mailing back the old Quads. -Ron - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
Since I was growing fairly quickly at the time and buying hardware anyway, it really didn't cost me a cent outside the cost of mailing back the old Quads.
That'd be nice. Back when that was happening in the US, they were selling the same cards here for $14k each and no trade-up deals were available... - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
Hi Albert, I agree technology wise its not that big of deal, buttttt when joe consumer shows up with his brand new shinny v.92 modem and you (or I) can't support it, it's just one more reason for him to go across the street... albert wrote:
I see all the Hoop-al about the V.92,..as far as i understand it will not really be a great benefit to the ISP/dial-up seller,.. will it?
what i understand is it will be a 44k-48k up and 56k to the client, whereas most of you are now 33.6 up and 56k to client,.. now i ask where is the big advantage?
Now for a unit/modem pool in service as a dial up to a business i can see a slight benefit, but for internet access ??
can someone straighten me out if i am way off base please.
albert.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Seth Jacobs Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:46 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dear Shawn,
Many thanks for the update re v.92. It IS appreciated! :)
Seth Jacobs OnRamp113 A TC1000 HyperDSP/24 owner
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Brown" <sbrown@source-t.com> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: RE: (usr-tc) V.92
Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92 This is an email from Amit Tiwari, Director of Product Management from Commworks.
-----Original Message----- From: Amit_Tiwari@3com.com [SMTP:Amit_Tiwari@3com.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 PM To: Shawn Brown Subject: V.92 statement
i) V.92 will be supported on the TC 1000 chassis. ii) V.92 will be supported via a SOFTWARE upgrade SKU on both the 24 port HDSP modem and the 96 port modem.
Thanks, Amit Tiwari Director, Product Management, Enhanced Data Systems, CommWorks, a 3Com Company
Thanks, Shawn Brown Founder Source Technology
-----Original Message----- From: CJ [SMTP:netadmin@seidata.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money.....
And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better.
Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed.
The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs.
Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes.
CJ
-----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As
far as I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM > To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92 > > > > > Dale Hege wrote: > > > > The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon that v.92 > > will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the > chassis with fan > > tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 > > Enhanced chassis. :( > > Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally > drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards > do not support V.92. > > -Ron > > - > To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" > with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. > For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send > "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
In short, all of us that have Quad Modem cards are screwed. And from what I have been reading, there are a lot of us! Sheldon _____________________________ Sheldon Koehler, Founder/Partner Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023 http://www.tenforward.com E-Commerce that makes sense! http://store.tenforward.com _____________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Brown" <sbrown@source-t.com> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: RE: (usr-tc) V.92
Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92 This is an email from Amit Tiwari, Director of Product Management from Commworks.
-----Original Message----- From: Amit_Tiwari@3com.com [SMTP:Amit_Tiwari@3com.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 PM To: Shawn Brown Subject: V.92 statement
i) V.92 will be supported on the TC 1000 chassis. ii) V.92 will be supported via a SOFTWARE upgrade SKU on both the 24 port HDSP modem and the 96 port modem.
Thanks, Amit Tiwari Director, Product Management, Enhanced Data Systems, CommWorks, a 3Com Company
Thanks, Shawn Brown Founder Source Technology
-----Original Message----- From: CJ [SMTP:netadmin@seidata.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money.....
And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better.
Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed.
The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs.
Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes.
CJ
-----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As
far as I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dale Hege wrote:
The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon
that v.92
will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the chassis with fan tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 Enhanced chassis. :(
Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards do not support V.92.
-Ron
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
What about v.44 and v.59? It doesn't end with just v.92. The customer will expect us to be compatible with all of these for different reasons. While v.92 has gotten the early press I fully expect v.44 to come on as the interest in better compression grows when users don't get dsl speeds from their dialup modems like they seem to think they wil with v.92. I am still in a quandry over what to do. There was never really was a good upgrade option provided when we had the cash to make a move, so now we have a fair number of quads that continue to perform well. I have not been able to detect any real difference to the clients between the quads or hipers so I am not in a hurry to get rid of them. I suspect 3Com will drop them out of the HiperArc code long before they lose value to our customers. Mark Thornton San Marcos Internet, Inc. 512-393-5300 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Brown" <sbrown@source-t.com> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:35 PM Subject: RE: (usr-tc) V.92
Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92 This is an email from Amit Tiwari, Director of Product Management from Commworks.
-----Original Message----- From: Amit_Tiwari@3com.com [SMTP:Amit_Tiwari@3com.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 PM To: Shawn Brown Subject: V.92 statement
i) V.92 will be supported on the TC 1000 chassis. ii) V.92 will be supported via a SOFTWARE upgrade SKU on both the 24 port HDSP modem and the 96 port modem.
Thanks, Amit Tiwari Director, Product Management, Enhanced Data Systems, CommWorks, a 3Com Company
Thanks, Shawn Brown Founder Source Technology
-----Original Message----- From: CJ [SMTP:netadmin@seidata.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money.....
And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better.
Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed.
The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs.
Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes.
CJ
-----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As
far as I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dale Hege wrote:
The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon
that v.92
will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the chassis with fan tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 Enhanced chassis. :(
Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards do not support V.92.
-Ron
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
Just a little off topic, but would anyone care to comment what code revs you using the HiperArc, HiperDsp and Quad modems? We are running all of these and I haven't upgraded them in a while. With all this discusion of new code I am also wondering if it isn't time to make a move. The service contracts I had ran out to renew them with 3com always seemed, well you all know.. I am running 2.0.19 on the dsp,4.2.32 on the Arc. -----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Mark Thornton Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 6:56 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92 What about v.44 and v.59? It doesn't end with just v.92. The customer will expect us to be compatible with all of these for different reasons. While v.92 has gotten the early press I fully expect v.44 to come on as the interest in better compression grows when users don't get dsl speeds from their dialup modems like they seem to think they wil with v.92. I am still in a quandry over what to do. There was never really was a good upgrade option provided when we had the cash to make a move, so now we have a fair number of quads that continue to perform well. I have not been able to detect any real difference to the clients between the quads or hipers so I am not in a hurry to get rid of them. I suspect 3Com will drop them out of the HiperArc code long before they lose value to our customers. Mark Thornton San Marcos Internet, Inc. 512-393-5300 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Brown" <sbrown@source-t.com> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:35 PM Subject: RE: (usr-tc) V.92
Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92 This is an email from Amit Tiwari, Director of Product Management from Commworks.
-----Original Message----- From: Amit_Tiwari@3com.com [SMTP:Amit_Tiwari@3com.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 PM To: Shawn Brown Subject: V.92 statement
i) V.92 will be supported on the TC 1000 chassis. ii) V.92 will be supported via a SOFTWARE upgrade SKU on both the 24 port HDSP modem and the 96 port modem.
Thanks, Amit Tiwari Director, Product Management, Enhanced Data Systems, CommWorks, a 3Com Company
Thanks, Shawn Brown Founder Source Technology
-----Original Message----- From: CJ [SMTP:netadmin@seidata.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money.....
And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better.
Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed.
The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs.
Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes.
CJ
-----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As
far as I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dale Hege wrote:
The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon
that v.92
will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the chassis with fan tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 Enhanced chassis. :(
Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards do not support V.92.
-Ron
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
v.59 is actually what I'm looking forward to more than v.92 or v.44. Anything that gives me more debugging output is way cool in my book. :) v.92 and v.44 are just little incremental speed bumps for our customers who can't get our ADSL service and can't afford ISDN... For what it's worth, 3Com (err, CommWorks, whatever) is running a deal til the end of the month (in the USA anyway), where if you buy a Double Play kit and ship back 12 Quads, you'll get a $1200 check back. It's not as nice as their older tradeup programs, but hey, it's better than nothing, and as we only had 12 Quads left anyway... http://www.commworks.com/svprovider/programs/total_control_eds/ Mike Andrews * mandrews@dcr.net * mandrews@bit0.com * http://www.bit0.com VP, sysadmin, & network guy, Digital Crescent Inc, Frankfort KY Internet access for Frankfort, Lexington, Louisville and surrounding counties www.fark.com: If it's not news, it's Fark. (Or something like that.) On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Mark Thornton wrote:
What about v.44 and v.59? It doesn't end with just v.92. The customer will expect us to be compatible with all of these for different reasons. While v.92 has gotten the early press I fully expect v.44 to come on as the interest in better compression grows when users don't get dsl speeds from their dialup modems like they seem to think they wil with v.92.
I am still in a quandry over what to do. There was never really was a good upgrade option provided when we had the cash to make a move, so now we have a fair number of quads that continue to perform well. I have not been able to detect any real difference to the clients between the quads or hipers so I am not in a hurry to get rid of them. I suspect 3Com will drop them out of the HiperArc code long before they lose value to our customers.
Mark Thornton San Marcos Internet, Inc. 512-393-5300
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Brown" <sbrown@source-t.com> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:35 PM Subject: RE: (usr-tc) V.92
Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92 This is an email from Amit Tiwari, Director of Product Management from Commworks.
-----Original Message----- From: Amit_Tiwari@3com.com [SMTP:Amit_Tiwari@3com.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 PM To: Shawn Brown Subject: V.92 statement
i) V.92 will be supported on the TC 1000 chassis. ii) V.92 will be supported via a SOFTWARE upgrade SKU on both the 24 port HDSP modem and the 96 port modem.
Thanks, Amit Tiwari Director, Product Management, Enhanced Data Systems, CommWorks, a 3Com Company
Thanks, Shawn Brown Founder Source Technology
-----Original Message----- From: CJ [SMTP:netadmin@seidata.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money.....
And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better.
Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed.
The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs.
Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes.
CJ
-----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As
far as I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dale Hege wrote: > > The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon that v.92 > will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the chassis with fan > tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 > Enhanced chassis. :(
Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards do not support V.92.
-Ron
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
At 05:35 PM 3/16/01 -0500, Shawn Brown wrote:
Informational Input regarding v.92 Hello, I want to update all the folks on this list regarding what is happening with Total Control and V.92
Any word on support for v44/v59 on HiPer DSPs? Also, what's the ante going to be to keep playing the game for those(many) that haven't found 3Com support contracts to be worth the investement? -- Kirk Mitchell-General Manager mitch@keyconn.net Keystone Connect Unlock Your World Altoona, PA 814-941-5000 http://www.keyconn.net - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
participants (11)
-
albert -
Kirk Mitchell -
Lists -
mark ross -
Mark Thornton -
Mike Andrews -
Ronald Kushner -
Seth Jacobs -
Shawn Brown -
Sheldon Koehler -
Terry Kennedy