Never played with it - but I have heard that the built-in NAT isn't that good. I have run a TC behind a discrete NAT device without any technical problems. However, we ditched the NAT due to certain things not working. For example - I find that about 90% of my users are using MSN Messenger these days. If you're behind a NAT, you can't send a file to another user or use voice chat. Also had a user that was doing some kind of ham radio streaming audio deal that wouldn't work behind the NAT. So we ditched it. - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Gen Camiling [mailto:gcamiling@imvi.com.ph] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:25 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] NAT on TC-1000 TC-1000 has Hiper System with TCS 4.3 codes loaded on the modules, talk about the NAT feature, is this the same as in the Cisco router's implemention of NAT? In Cisco you assign a particular pool of private IP addresses to the Async modules, then you add a range of public IP address where the private IP address would be translated. Been checking the docs and the KB with not enuff info, anything from anyone on the list will be much appreciated. -- Best regards, Gen ================================== Gen Camiling Chief Technical Officer International Micro Village, Inc. PHILIPPINES (63)(2) 7512130 http://www.imvi.com.ph mailto:gcamiling@imvi.com.ph ================================== _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
participants (1)
-
Joel - Fox Computers