i concur with all this poster said, especially on the 3com web site, and many many corporate sites are using the same consultants i guess because the net is filled with the same krap, all flash and no content,.. and the writing...! man alive and thank the lord i have a key set to enlarge, otherwise i could not read 9 out of ten sites out there any more. and what does Jane and john doe need an uplink of 48k for? to send one little URL to the server?? give me a break. and for this big boost in productivity i am supposed to recommend they go out and buy a new modem? and worse the ISP is supposed to spend millions on new pools? i wish for one silly upgrade cycle Jane and john and the ISP's of the world would just keep their wallets shut!! that is where the real power is, and if our wallets are shut maybe the 3coms and the cisco's would get off their duffs and support what is there. when are we the "people" gunna get tired of getting sucked in?? nuff said. albert.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 11:33 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: (usr-tc) [Fwd: V.92: USR/3Com blows random quadrupeds]
Found this on a newsgroup tonight. Any thoughts?
-Ron
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: V.92: USR/3Com blows random quadrupeds Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 17:12:07 -0500 From: Matt Black <albedo0@hotpop.com> Organization: And Now This Newsgroups: chi.internet
I hadn't been paying any attention to this until just now, but it looks like 3Com/USR has been f--king up royally when it comes to making its analog modems compatible with V.92.
First of all, most owners of USR V.90, x2, and V.34 modems, even late i co
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.