A side note...if users dial in using slip instead of ppp...they will appear to connect and get assigned 0.0.0.0. Have you confirmed this isn't something on the users end? Todd ----- Original Message ----- From: "Todd Bertolozzi" <berto@voyager.net> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [USR-TC] All 0's hell
Doesn't totally apply but I found in commworks a solution for a Netserver sporadically handing out 0.0.0.0 instead of a valid address from the dialup pools:
**** Connect either via console or telnet and do: set s0 login save all ****
Maybe that will spark a solution from someone.
Todd ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joshua Coombs" <jcoombs@gwi.net> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: Re: [USR-TC] All 0's hell
PRI, 7 per chassis, DS3 ingress. 8 chassis total, 1 arc per chassis, all doing mpip with one chassis as the primary mpip server, one as the secondary. As far as I can tell mpip is working correctly.
We do see alot of multilink customers getting all 0's, when they do that connection only stays up for about 30 seconds then drops. Their first connection stops routing once the second leg connects.
As far as normal behavior, if both links hit one chassis, they both show up with the same ip in the logs. Can't produce logs off the top of my head of a multilink connection across chassis at the moment.
This is affecting some regular, single connection analog dialup customers as well.
Joshua Coombs GWI Networking
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 01:58 pm, Todd Bertolozzi wrote:
Are these PRI or CT1's? If they are PRI do you have MPIP setup?
Todd ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joshua Coombs" <jcoombs@gwi.net> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com>; "Oliver Francke" <Oliver.Francke@mediaWays.net> Cc: "David Hamilton" <dhamilton@voyager.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:45 PM Subject: Re: [USR-TC] All 0's hell
Tried turning up logging, and while I can see some customers failing PPP login, none of them are getting all 0's. The ones that are only generate proper session connected and session disconnected entries.
Joshua Coombs GWI Networking
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 04:45 am, Oliver Francke wrote:
Hi *,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:46:17AM -0800, Steve Brown wrote:
No, 254 is correct.
Ouch, yes, it's too early in the morning, should NOT have sent out this email before having at least 2 coffee ;-)
But perhaps one can do a
set facILITY ip logLEVEL unUSUAL
and either per console access or via telnet +
show events
get some hints from the output...?!
Regards, Oliver.
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc