IMHO separate hunt groups would be too onerous for anyone to pursue since 98-99% of our current users appear to be working using the current config. Unfortunately, when 1-2% of your users call with connection problems, it is annoying! I would say that the vast majority of v.90 and v.34 modems can train up fine with the v.92 enabled. Certainly. most ISP's don't establish separate hunt groups for v.92! Jim BSmith@solunet.com wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Jim Johnson [mailto:jim@perigee.net] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:39 AM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] 3.5.109 Connection Issues
We are having connection issues with some users who never finish training up since we changed the DSP Code to 3.5.109.
We enabled all the v.92 settings and v.44 compression. Yesterday, I disabled PCM Upstream, but it hasn't made any difference that we can tell so far.
Cheers,
Jim _______________________________________________
Jim,
The problem you are having is as such:
If you enable v92, non v92 modems will NOT connect. If you want to run v92, you need to setup it's own trunk(s) and just configure those DSPs. So, your config can be as such:
DSP 1-4 = v90 = 555-1212 DSP 5-8 = v92 = 555-1213
If a v90 (or below) tries to connect to span 5-8, no workie joe. Make sense? Why you ask? The v92 send back info (via the handshake), and the v90 does not know how to handle it, and it fails.
Hope that helps!
Brian Smith CCNA, NCSA Network Support Engineer SOLUSERVE www.solunet.com 1571 Robert J. Conlan Blvd., Suite 110 Palm Bay, FL 32905 (888)449-5766 fax: (321)-676-1287
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc