2.0.60 and 4.1.59-6 seems to be the most stable DSP/ARC code. Most of the diff. in 4.2 series is for routing protocols (bgp) from what I understand. Paul Farber Farber Technology farber@admin.f-tech.net Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Mark E. Levy wrote:
A few weeks ago, I upgraded my DSPs to 2.0.60 & my ARCs to 4.2.32. Almost immediately, I began to get complaints from users with either Kflex-only or 33.6 or slower modems that they had extreme difficulty connecting or staying connected. I downgraded the DSPs back to 2.0.19 & the ARCs to 4.1.59.
I later heard from someone on the ISP-TECH list that he, too, had problems with that 2.0.60 & 4.2.32, and downgraded his ARCs to 4.1.59 but left the DSPs alone, and that solved his problems.
I'd like to know if anyone else is running 2.0.60 with 4.1.59 without problems before I consider re-upgrading my DSPs (none of which are hardware rev 55) to get the alleged Rockwell fix.
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark E. Levy, President FSINet, Inc. 800-827-6085 x202 847-753-6832 fax www.fsi.net mark@fsi.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.