Freeraduis-0.3 vs Cistron-1.6.4 ( i believe ) I have not tried it without the netmask. I can try it when I have a chance, but I'm curious why/how this would help? I've attached tcpdumps from of packets from both radius servers.. Radius2 is a freeradius server and SVR4 is a cistron server.. The packet dumps are for exactly identical accounts, so there is no difference in idle timeout for this case.. Thanks -j ----- Original Message ----- From: <mike@otherland.dyndns.org> To: <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:47 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) hiperarc + freeradius woes
You have left a few items out of the problem description..
1) Whats the code version? 2) Have you tried removing the netmask? Its redundant information. 3) If possible, post a HEX trace of packet.. I would suspect some NULL padding by the RADIUS server might confuse the HARC.
-M
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Marshall Morgan wrote:
The results are the same minus the idle timeout value - what about changing it from 0 to 999 or 300?
Marshall Morgan
Internet Doorway, Inc (aka NETDOOR) http://www.netdoor.com
601.969.1434 x28 | 800.952.1570 x28 | 601.969.3629 x28 | Fax 601.969.3838 ----- Original Message ----- From: "jason" <rohwedde@codegrinder.com> To: <usr-tc@xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:38 PM Subject: (usr-tc) hiperarc + freeradius woes
I'm not sure how active this list still is but here goes ::
I'm having a strange problem with getting Framed-IP-Address to work with a HiperArc Total Control Unit. It seems that even though the Framed-IP-Address is set, it won't respect that and assigns a dynamic, when my freeradius server is in action. It works however when talking to the old Cistron server.
The othe thing is that my good ole portmaster 2 works fine with either.. These hiperarcs seem to be finicky beasts and I imagine that either I'd not seeing something it wants or there is some configureation setting that we're not aware of that needs to be tweaked