That could be. My first time I loaded the new code to the least used card on the theory that if something went wrong it wouldn't affect anyone. Unfortunate, it also meant that I didn't notice until weeks later that the card was returning fast busies. Now we upgrade the first card in the hunt group, so if something goes wrong we know it right away that there's a problem and that it was caused by the upgrade. Seth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Casen" <Xeen@Aros.Net> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:11 AM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems
It's a wee bit fuzzy in my mind, but I'm pretty sure that you can load the new code into the DSP and that it requires a reboot to take affect. Because when I did all my upgrades at the same time, I would be rebooting the first DSP that I loaded the code onto while I uploaded the code onto the next. I didn't have any users on them at the time, but my suspicion would be that they wouldn't notice an outage until the reboot.
-----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Support Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:52 AM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems
Dumb question of the day.... I should be able to load new DSP code while the system is live and there are users online without buggering anything or kicking anyone offline, right? The new code won't be active until I reboot the DSP card I'd guess, which will boot everyone offline at that point, but up till then, can everyone stay online? I'd like to load the new code during the day and schedult a reboot for 4:30 AM when there are fewer people online. Thanx
Todd Chamberlain
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Shumate" <marks@infowest.com> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:40 PM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems
Yeah, you definately need later code. We had tons of trouble when we installed 3.5.12, but it cleared up with later code revisions. We are using 3.5.105 now and things are going pretty well. We actually had the most trouble with USRobotics Winmodems on 3.5.12 but I believe we had trouble with some HCF and software based modems too. Other people experienced the same problems if I recall correctly.
-= Mark Shumate -= IS Manager -= InfoWest -= http://www.infowest.com
-----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Casen Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:17 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems
I never actually used 3.5.12, Source-T stopped me from installing it and sent me the 3.5.105 instead, which we haven't experienced any problems since installing. So I would say get the 3.5.105 as well.
Casen
-----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Joel - Fox Computers Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:07 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems
Just my opinion - 3.5.12 gotta go - you need 3.5.103 or 3.5.105. With either 103 or 105, we see 50666 or 52000 all the time on Conexant modems.
-----Original Message----- From: Cindy Smith [mailto:cindyo@ktc.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:42 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems
3.5.12 for the DSP code 5.3.3 on the Arc code 8.6.3 on the NMC code
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Casen wrote:
Just for reference, what firmwares did you upgrade to?
-----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Cindy Smith Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:47 AM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems
I have upgraded a few of our pops. I cut on the V.92 features.
There seems to be a problem with these modems...
Creative Labs v.92 Broadxent DI 3631 Dell Data fax (no Model info) Rockwell 56K HCF DNF RTAD PCI Modem
Does anyone know of any modems strings that might come in handy to get
these customers connected?
Any advice would be appreciated.
TIA -- Cindy
-- ---------------------------- Cindy Smith 830-896-1111 KTC iNet SysAdmin ----------------------------
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc