<vent>That's the way it should be. If there's a security breach, that's a serious bug and you should get it fixed for free. That should be basic warrantly. Charging for a 'bug fix' is ridiculous. I fully understand charging for extra features (like V.92 for example) that may not even have been on the drawing board when the hardware was originally purchased, but to charge for basic configuration software / drivers / bug fixes is ludicrous. Can you imagine if other hardware companies like Lexmark or Canon charged for printer drives for their Ink Jet printers? Then you tell them that it doesn't do something basic because of a bug in the driver (like not printing red in scanned photos), and they charge you $200 for a driver upgrade again. OK, </vent> Todd Chamberlain support@inet2000.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Sprickman" <spork@inch.com> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:47 PM Subject: Re: [USR-TC] Software Agreement
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, WayneG wrote:
Just because Cisco "allows" someone under any service contract to download any IOS version, doesn't make it legal. Cisco contract requires that you purchase a separate support contract for EVERY piece of Cisco gear that you want supported. And Cisco licensing requires that you purchase a separate license for EVERY IOS in every router. These IOS versions can sometimes cost more than the router itself.
There's a big loophole though... If a security problem arises (the ssh DoS being the last), you get to belly up to the IOS buffet for free. Just call them and let them know you're running a vulnerable version and you get a nice new fixed one that's up to date.
I don't know of any other vendor that does this...
Charles
-Wayne
----- Original Message ----- From: "Todd Bertolozzi" <berto@voyager.net> To: <usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:31 AM Subject: RE: [USR-TC] Software Agreement
I couldn't resist in saying something since the 3com folk have piped
up.
Cisco is FAR superior to Commworks when it comes to:
a) Their product
b) The software support
c) The technical support whether that be via TAC or just browsing
through
their homepage.
I have used both products for many years now and inititally thought the 3com product was awesome with it's high port density and their nifty snmp device (Total Control Manager). After a couple years I began to miss Cisco's reliabilty and their never ending plight to make sure the customer is happy.
On the 3com side I have seen nothing other then how they can make more money. They should invest more of their resources in their technical department then their accounting dept. How is it Cisco can allow customers to freely download software and utilize resources that Commworks wants to charge for? Maybe because Cisco is assured that they know what customers want and Commworks figures they better charge up the ying yang before everyone switches vendors realizing that they no longer put their time and resources into making a superior product.
BTW....many vendors will happily melt down the competitors products and do some sort of port exchange.
Todd
-----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Jeff Mcadams Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:53 AM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [USR-TC] Software Agreement
Also sprach Lewis Bergman
On Monday 22 July 2002 04:11 pm, Thomas_Goodman@3com.com wrote:
All
There have been a few posts where people are asking the list for licensed software and some people taking a public risk by making arrangements to send it.
I hope we can avoid legal issues that can be caused by such activity and have attached copy of the license agreement that everyone must agree to before downloading code, any code, off of TotalService.
Another reason to think of some other NAS next time.
Agreed wholeheartedly.
I believe you should abide by any license for software you use.
Although, there is some debate over whether "click-wrap" or "shrink-wrap" licenses like this are legal or not, so it may be 3Com (and virtually every other commercial software developer on the planet) that's breaking the law here! Actually...it wouldn't be breaking the law, but the license agreement may very well not be enforceable.
Of course, there are plenty of other reasons not to use Total Control gear in this day and age...and I'll not go into those. :/
I am investigating Lucent's take on such things (although I note you can even download some v.92 code without a contract) more diligently. $2500 a year for software upgrades is highway robbery. I will also research Patton to find ISP's luck with connections and reliability.
Don't forget Cisco. I played with a AS5350...and its really quite nice. Seamless Modem, ISDN, Fax, VoIP, and TDM mux, all in one box for about the same price-per-port of a TC box, and much more reasonable support policies than 3Com/CommWorks. -- Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm@iglou.com Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc