I have seen more connection success rate with 2.0.51. I use to get 94-98% connection success overall for all calls to a chassis for a 24 hour period. I now see more like 96-98% average. On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Brian wrote:
2.0.51 is good for all DSP's
How's it compare to 2.0.81? Better, worse, indifferent?
Charles
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Cheryl Johnson wrote:
Is this code only recommended for hardware revisions .54 and .55 only? I have .49 and was thinking of moving to the 2.0.51 from the 2.0.60 since I do not see too many improvements. And is this compatible with NMC 6.1.17 and ARC 4.1.22? It seems to be getting more difficult to keep these things straight.
-Cheryl Johnson SEI Data Network Services, Inc. A Division of SEI Communications
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.