I have two of the older chassis, the ones where the fan tray's are seperate. I had to upgrade my NETSERVER board to the HIPER ARC, and then everything was fine. I have quad cards and 1 hiper DSP , with a HIPER ARC card in the old chassis. Andrew -----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of CJ Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:21 AM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92 Well from what I know there is an older chassis that does not have the integrated fan tray, the newer chassis with the integrated fan tray which I think most ISPs that use TC are currently using from what I have read, and then the brand new TC 1000, pretty blue tabs and fancy new architecture. Yippee!! New equipment mean more money..... And yes Jeff, I would have to agree the support contracts are ridiculious. And they probably won't get any better. Getting a lot of mixed ideas of if the v.92/v.44 code will be able to be used on the 24 port DSP cards? Or will have to upgrade to the new 96 port? Lance, above said he has tested the 96 port DSP in an older chassis. Great for you. But haven't used this in the field. I guess, what everyone and myself wants to know is if the 24 port DSP will be compatible for v.92, are the new cards *really* compatible with the now older chassis (not the TC 1000), and when will we get the answers needed. The way I see it the ISPs get screwed (excuse my french) one way or another by the manufacturer's who supply the access equipment. They will market a new line which will require upgrades of equipment to make more money off the ISPs. Fortunately, I use another type of access equipment for our larger markets. The only thing that is supposed to be required is a simple upgrade of a flash card and new modem code. **Knock on wood**....Never assume anything. I am hopeful to have this up and running on this equipment by May/June. But usually add about two to three months to the expected due date and your usually right. Plus working out all the bugs from the initial codes. CJ -----Original Message----- From: mark ross <mark@ccis.com> To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com <usr-tc@lists.xmission.com> Date: Thursday, March 15, 2001 9:38 PM Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Hi By "newer chassis" are you talking about the one with the Intergrated fan tray ? or is there something else thats newer now ?
How may t-1's can you cram into a chassis until you start running up against I/O bandwidth of the packet bus ??
I am still using 4 of the old chassis with quads and netserver cards
just wondering ??
see ya...
Lance Eves wrote:
Is there not anyone besides myself that has the 96 port cards? As far as
I
can tell they integrate in just fine with everything else. Of course there is the code upgrade.... The newer chassis has a bigger and badder (or is that more bad) ARC and NMC, and I believe that the backplane is also enhanced. I played around with it all when I got the new chassis. It all seems to play nice with one another in one of the older chassis that I have. Of course when it was all said and done, I put all the pieces back in the enhanced chassis and put it into production. I have the 96 port and 7-24 port DSP cards in the chassis and it is all working like a charm.
Lance
-----Original Message----- From: owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-usr-tc@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Ronald Kushner Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:37 PM To: usr-tc@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: (usr-tc) V.92
Dale Hege wrote:
The really sad thing is I was told by my vendor this afternoon that
v.92
will only be supported on the 96Port dsps. Also that the chassis with fan tray will not support the 96Port cards you need to buy the TC1000 Enhanced chassis. :(
Sounds like someone is trying to sell you some hardware. I'll personally drive to Chicago and burn down the 3Com building if the HiPer DSP cards do not support V.92.
-Ron
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
- To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message. - To unsubscribe to usr-tc, send an email to "majordomo@xmission.com" with "unsubscribe usr-tc" in the body of the message. For information on digests or retrieving files and old messages send "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.