I never actually used 3.5.12, Source-T stopped me from installing it and sent me the 3.5.105 instead, which we haven't experienced any problems since installing. So I would say get the 3.5.105 as well. Casen -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Joel - Fox Computers Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:07 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems Just my opinion - 3.5.12 gotta go - you need 3.5.103 or 3.5.105. With either 103 or 105, we see 50666 or 52000 all the time on Conexant modems. -----Original Message----- From: Cindy Smith [mailto:cindyo@ktc.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:42 PM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems 3.5.12 for the DSP code 5.3.3 on the Arc code 8.6.3 on the NMC code On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Casen wrote:
Just for reference, what firmwares did you upgrade to?
-----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Cindy Smith Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:47 AM To: usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] V.92 problem modems
I have upgraded a few of our pops. I cut on the V.92 features.
There seems to be a problem with these modems...
Creative Labs v.92 Broadxent DI 3631 Dell Data fax (no Model info) Rockwell 56K HCF DNF RTAD PCI Modem
Does anyone know of any modems strings that might come in handy to get
these customers connected?
Any advice would be appreciated.
TIA -- Cindy
-- ---------------------------- Cindy Smith 830-896-1111 KTC iNet SysAdmin ---------------------------- _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc