No, 254 is correct. .1 = 1st pool address .254 = 254th pool address NOT 1 + 254 = 255 There are 256 addresses including 0 256 - 1 (.0 network) - 1 ( .255 broadcast ) = 254 So, 254 is correct. Steve
-----Original Message-----
Hi Joshua,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:44:34PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
...
Joshua Coombs extolled:
IP ADDRESS POOLS Name Address Size InUse State Route Unused Priority Status DYNAMIC 216.195.153.1/C 254 220 PUBLIC
AGGREGATE 0
1 ACTIVE
Well, perhaps you first try to reduce it to "size 253" to omit the broadcast-address. That is, you have to reconfigure the pools with a smaller size.
Hope it helps.
Regards, Oliver.
-- Oliver.Francke@mediaWays.net fon. +49-5246-80-1389 mob. +49-171-5597734 I used to have a sig, but I've stopped smoking.
_______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc