May 2003 - USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

06 May '03

Still have fully loaded Hiper chassis in stock!!! $2750.00 each I also have a few more Hiper NMC's that I am parting out. Have around 10-15 of them I'd sell for $400.00 each Hiper DSP cards T-1 Version $175.00 each Hiper ARC's 128Mb version $125.00 each If anyone needs a spare chassis or 50 let me know!! Thanks for your time, Shannan Young SouthWest Data Technology, Inc. 972-739-7010 972-739-7013 (Fax) sky1(a)airmail.net www.swdt.com

1 0

RE: *MORE INFO* RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas?MajorWTFhere.
by Joel - Fox Computers 06 May '03

06 May '03

Final solution found - For those of you who may have been following this and wondered "what the....", here it is. The exceptions on the ARC causing it to reboot, AND all the B-channels going out of service, appear to have been caused entirely by a bad DSP in one of the slots. We swapped the ARC and the NMC with different ones, slightly different code on the ARC even, and kept getting the same problem. Pulled all the DSP's except the first two, and the thing ran like a champ. With utilization near 100% on those first two DSP's, we started plugging in the other DSP's. The second we plugged in the DSP in slot 8, all the users dropped off those first two cards and the B-channels went out of service. Permanently removed that DSP from slot 8 and replaced it with a spare, and the whole chassis has been running fine now for several days without a problem. So it was a bad DSP all along. - Joel -----Original Message----- From: Paul Farber [mailto:farber@admin.f-tech.net] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 7:33 PM To: Discussion relating to the 3Com/US Robotics Total Control modem systems. Subject: RE: *MORE INFO* RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas?MajorWTFhere. Tell us what finally does fix it. -- Paul Farber Farber Technology farber(a)admin.f-tech.net Ph 570-628-5303 Fax 570-628-5545 On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Joel - Fox Computers wrote: > Thanks! > > That's pretty much been the response here. Thanks to ALL who have replied on and off list! > > We're going to check for power problems, swap out with a new chassis from Shannan, and then if it still doesn't work we're going to yell a lot at the telco. > > Thanks again for all the help! > > - Joel > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: matthew(a)the-spa.com [mailto:matthew@the-spa.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 5:10 PM > To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com > Subject: RE: *MORE INFO* RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any > Ideas?MajorWTFhere. > > > > ok. > > so the rack totally worked fine with the current setup and software > versions in a different place with a different telco? > > i wouldn't touch the software. > > i would focus on what changed... > > the obvious stuff, the telco and the switch settings. > > i've been pretty lucky with this and have had some very co-operative > telco guys, especially the switch techs, for the most part once you > get to them, they can be very helpful. > > have you thought about silly stuff like power? is the power > fluctuating? > > long shot. but what the hell. > > i would focus on the switch type and the cabling. i would explain to > them that it worked 100% elsewhere and only acted up here. > > the hiper arc acting up make no sense but i definitely wouldn't be > worrying too much about software revisions in a case like this. > > matthew > > > > > ---- Original Message ---- > From: jfox(a)foxcomputers.com > To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com > Subject: RE: *MORE INFO* RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas? > MajorWTFhere. > Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 13:08:30 -0500 > > >I considered that, but I've been running 5.3.110 for a long time > >without a problem. > > > >On a different rack: > > > >HiPer>> show date > >System Date: 26-APR-2003 18:01:20 > >System UpTime: 19d 14:52:59 > >HiPer>> _show ver > >V5.3.110 - 0 /Non-Encr > >HiPer>> > > > >Only 19 days because that was when we had a major power outage - > >otherwise, not a glitch. I can't imagine this being a firmware issue > >at all, unless someone can relate similar results on a similar config > >or something I'm missing. > > > >In addition, the box that's doing this has had 5.3.110 on it for a > >while now. It was only in a move to a new colo that this started > >happening. Which is why I suspect telco issues, but don't understand > >how that could be causing exceptions and reboots on the ARC. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Joel > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Marshall Morgan [mailto:marshall@netdoor.com] > >Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 11:17 AM > >To: Discussion relating to the 3Com/US Robotics Total Control > >modemsystems. > >Subject: Re: *MORE INFO* RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas? > >Major WTFhere. > > > > > >Downgrade the ARC code. > > > >System UpTime: 130d 09:05:50 > >System Version: V5.3.3/Non-Encr > > > >Marshall Morgan > > > >Internet Doorway, Inc (aka NETDOOR) > >http://www.netdoor.com > > > >601.969.1434 x28 | 800.952.1570 x28 | 601.969.3629 x28 | Fax > >601.969.3838 > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Joel - <mailto:jfox@foxcomputers.com> Fox Computers > >To: Discussion relating to the 3Com/US > ><mailto:usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> Robotics Total Control > >modemsystems. > >Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 9:43 AM > >Subject: *MORE INFO* RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas? Major > >WTF here. > > > > > >Yep, I was working that late - Wish this was one of Shannan's boxes. > > > >This morning, the ARC on this unit rebooted again. and absolutely > >every B-channel was local out-of-service. At the reboot, the ARC > >said this: > > > >EXCEPTION 0300 CRASH DUMP: > > > >GPRs: > >R0: 0x0065EC88 R1: 0x07F55E88 R2: 0x000F3200 R3: 0x41820114 > >R4: 0x07F55F68 R5: 0x00000003 R6: 0x00000006 R7: 0x0000000F > >R8: 0x00000000 R9: 0x00000000 R10: 0x0000000F R11: 0x00000006 > >R12: 0x0000003C R13: 0x000FD248 R14: 0x0099D9FC R15: 0x0099D9E0 > >R16: 0x0099D9E8 R17: 0x0099D9D4 R18: 0x0099D9DC R19: 0x0099D9EC > >R20: 0xFFFFFEFF R21: 0x00CC5FF0 R22: 0x00306F34 R23: 0x00C10220 > >R24: 0x00000000 R25: 0x014D9364 R26: 0x01E4F2B4 R27: 0x00000000 > >R28: 0x009D9070 R29: 0x00000000 R30: 0x000000FF R31: 0x01342E44 > > > >SPRs: > >CR: 0x20000400 XER: 0x20000000 LR: 0x0065EC88 CTR: > >0x005171BC > >SRR0: 0x00661FC0 SRR1: 0x00009030 DSISR: 0x40000000 DAR: > >0x41820157 > >DMISS: 0x41820150 DCMP: 0x80000006 HASH1: 0x00010800 HASH2: > >0x0001F7C0 > >IMISS: 0x00000000 ICMP: 0x00000000 RPA: 0x00000000 IABR: > >0x00000000 > > > >82660 Registers: > >Err Status 1: 0x00, Err Status 2: 0x00, CPU Err: 0x14, PCI Err: 0x06 > >CPU/PCI Addr: 0x00061EFC, Sys Error Addr: 0x0006E960 > > > >Call Stack: > > 0x00661FC0 (Exception return address - SRR0) > > 0x0065EC88 > > 0x0063B3F8 > > 0x00638594 > > 0x00306F88 > > 0x007F6BB4 > > 0x007F6E74 > > 0x002008D4 > > 0x0020024C > > 0x0020009C > > 0x000A95A0 > >The first 2000 bytes in the Stack follows > >0x83C10010 0x7C0803A6 0x8001001C 0x906CC040 0x38600001 > >0x3D80009A 0x48000010 0x38600000 0x4182000C 0x2C030000 > >0x90610008 0x483E4875 0x38A00040 0x8084BFC0 0x3C80009A > >0x387F0000 0x907E0004 0x483F5CC1 0x9143001C 0xB17E0000 > >0x614A4354 0x816B19C8 0x3D404143 0x83C30008 0x3D600089 > >0x4800005C 0x38600000 0x4182000C 0x2C0C0000 0x81810008 > >0x41820010 0x7C7F1B79 0x483F1605 0x9001001C 0x38A00040 > >0x93E10014 0x60845030 0x38C10008 0x93C10010 0x38600014 > >0x3C805544 0x9421FFE8 0x7C0802A6 0x4E800020 0x38210040 > >0x7C0803A6 0xBB010020 0x80010044 0x7D99C12E 0x39800000 > >0x4182000C 0x2C0B0000 0x7D79C02E 0x3B393514 0x3F200089 > >0x4181FF28 0x2C0C0000 0x81990010 0x483EA8ED 0x387E0000 > >0x483EA8F5 0x807E0008 0x483F1801 0x38800000 0x807F0000 > >0x40820018 0x2C0B0000 0x897F0004 0x83FE0008 0x4BFFC5E1 > >0x38A00002 0x7C6C5A14 0x81830008 0x389F0000 0x8163000C > >0x4082001C 0x7C1D6000 0x83AB0004 0x816B0000 0x618C6104 > >0x817E0008 0x3D80554D 0x994C024A 0x394A00FF 0x894C024A > >0x7D8C5A14 0x8163000C 0x81830008 0x41820050 0x7C7F1B79 > >0x483FEF9D 0x809D0000 0x83AA0008 0x814A0000 0x387C0000 > >0x81430008 0x996C0004 0x396B00FF 0x896C0004 0x81830008 > >0x418200D4 0x2C030000 0x408200DC 0x2C0A0000 0x8141000C > >0x3BC30000 0x483E609D 0x38800000 0x38790000 0x38A1000C > >0x3B3E0000 0x3B9C64A0 0x3F8000CE 0x408100EC 0x2C0A0000 > >0x815E0010 0x7FCC5A14 0x398C6550 0x3D8000CE 0x1D6B0024 > >0x572B063E 0x4180FFCC 0x2C1C0100 0x3B9C0001 0x4BFFF40D > >0x387F0000 0x38810008 0x9B810008 0x40820014 0x7C0BD800 > >0x7D6BD838 0x7FBB6030 0x7D7E58AE 0x578C077E 0x578BEEFE > >0x3BBC0000 0x7FC96214 0x3BFB0000 0x39292A9C 0x3B800001 > >0x3D200089 0x1D9B0530 0x573B063E 0x4181FFA0 0x7C0AF840 > >0x815D02DC 0x3BFF0001 0x3BDE0138 0x7D3CC12E 0x39200000 > >0x483F1961 0x38800000 0x7C7CC02E 0x483F7F15 0x38800020 > >0x41820020 0x2C030000 0x7C7CC02E 0x7F8C5A14 0x8163000C > >0x81830008 0x41820038 0x2C030000 0x483FF0C1 0x387A0000 > >0x808C00F8 0x7D8CF214 0x819B0000 0x3B7BD150 0x3B5A64A0 > >0x3BBC0000 0x3BDF0000 0x3F60009A 0x3F4000CE 0x41820080 > >0x2C0B0000 0x817C02DC 0x3BE00000 0x4800020C 0x4181FF74 > >0x7C0AD840 0x815D02DC 0x3B7B0001 0x3BFF0138 0x48000711 > >0x91410014 0xB161001A 0x7D4A602E 0x39600000 0x91610010 > >0x38610010 0x1D9E001C 0xB1810018 0x7D5D5214 0x1D4A0054 > >0x816B00F8 0x572A063E 0x7D6BFA14 0x817A0000 0x572C063E > >0x91840028 0x39800000 0x4082004C 0x2C0A0000 0x7D44C02E > >0x7C8C5A14 0x8163000C 0x81830008 0x41820064 0x2C030000 > >0x483FF17D 0x387C0000 0x808C00F8 0x7D8CFA14 0x819A0000 0x3B5AD > >BOOT PROM Version 1.16 (Built on June 9th, 1998 at 12:24:24) > >Loading kernel ... OK > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: S.Young [mailto:sky1@airmail.net] > >Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 1:59 AM > >To: Discussion relating to the 3Com/US Robotics Total Control > >modemsystems. > >Subject: Re: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas? Major WTF here. > > > > > >Joel. > >You gotta be kidding me. My e-mail says it's 11:57 P.M. Please tell > >me you aren't still messing around with Total Control boxes at this > >hour. (Actually, it's 1:45 A.M. here in Dallas, I'm up feeding > >junior (6-month old son) ). The internet will survive, take a > >break!! > >If you need a spare/benchmark unit out there, let me know and I'll > >get one going your way. All I ask is that you pick up the freight on > >this "beast". > >You must not have got that unit from us, we never have any problems > >with the units WE send out. > >Go to Bed! > >Shannan Young > >SouthWest Data Technology, Inc. > >sky1(a)airmail.net > >www.swdt.com > >972-739-7010 > >972-739-7013 (Fax) > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Joel <mailto:jfox@foxcomputers.com> - Fox Computers > >To: Discussion relating to the <mailto:usr-tc@mailman.xmission.com> > >3Com/US Robotics Total Control modemsystems. > >Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:54 PM > >Subject: RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas? Major WTF here. > > > > > >Too funny - but thanks for the vote of confidence - this one has me > >stumped - but I'm certain I don't have 8 bad DSP's, that I'm sure of. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: matthew(a)the-spa.com [mailto:matthew@the-spa.com] > >Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:23 PM > >To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com > >Subject: RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas? Major WTF here. > > > > > > > >i had something similar but it was only on one card, and that card > >would show funny lights when you booted it up from day one and it > >just turned out to be a bad card. > > > > you have a whole bunch of cards all doing this, so i don't know what > >it could be. > > > > if i had this i would call you and just have you figure it out :) > > > > matthew > > > > > >---- Original Message ---- > >From: jfox(a)foxcomputers.com > >To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com > >Subject: RE: [USR-TC] Urgent Problem - Any Ideas? Major WTF here. > >Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 22:06:49 -0500 > > > >> > >>Ok - here's the story. > >> > >>Just set up a chassis that has 3.5.109 on the DSP's, 5.3.110 on the > >>ARC, 8.6.3 on the NMC. Running 8 PRI's the telco says are > >configured > >>on a DMS100. > >> > >>Loaded factory defaults on everything and configured it up. The > >unit > >>started taking calls, everything looked good. Got up to about 100 > >>users on. Walked away from it. > >> > >>After about 2 hours, came back to it, and no callers. in session > >>monitor in TCM, the (most) B-channels on all 8 PRI's showed "Local > >>out of service". All except on the 8th PRI, one caller remained > >>connected. I also noticed the D-ALM light intermittently going red > >>on some of the PRI's. As I watched, slowly the B-channels all > >>started changing to "Idle" and "in service". But not all at once, > >on > >>any give PRI, I'd have the D up, and 19 of the B's, with any 4 of > >the > >>B's still "local out of service". > >> > >>Talked to the Telco, they said everything was up and the B-channels > >>were taken down on our end. > >> > >>At this time, I noticed a message on the console port of the ARC > >that > >>said: > >>At 17:48:04, Facility "GWC Modem Driver", Level "CRITICAL":: > >>callline->callstate = 9 > >> > >>Now, I've seen similar behavior when the switch type was not > >correct. > >> Without help from the Telco, I tried changing the switch type on > >the > >>trunk settings to NI2 (which turned out to be the correct answer > >last > >>time something like this happened). Then rebooted all of the DSP's. > >> > >>Once I did this - the D-channels stopped dropping and all the > >>B-channels were back, callers started getting on again. Looked > >good. > >> > >>2 1/2 hours later, checked on the box. Only 3 DSP's had callers. > >At > >>this point, noticed on the terminal, that the ARC had rebooted. > >>Scrolling up in HyperTerminal revealed that some type of exception > >>had happened, and the ARC had rebooted. (Turned on text capture on > >>HyperTerminal at this point). > >> > >>15 minutes later, all of the callers disappeared. Checked, and all > >>B-channels were down. Thinking it might be ARC related, I gave the > >>ARC a reboot command. Immediately on giving it the reboot - this is > >>what I saw: > >> > >>HiPer>> reboot > >>You have requested to Reboot the system > >>Please confirm the request.(No/Yes):y > >> > >>Rebooting.... > >>At 21:07:44, Facility "Configurator", Level "INFORMATION":: Received > >>a CFG_SERVICE_CLOSED_MSG message. Administrator Network Service > >>telnetd has been disabled. > >>At 21:07:44, Facility "GWC Modem Driver", Level "CRITICAL":: > >>callline->callstate = 1 > >> > >>At 21:07:44, Facility "GWC Modem Driver", Level "CRITICAL":: > >>callline->callstate = 1 > >> > >>At 21:07:44, Facility "GWC Modem Driver", Level "CRITICAL":: > >>callline->callstate = 1 > >> > >> > >> > >>Immediately after this, I pulled up session monitor on one of the > >>DSPs. And about 10 seconds later all of the B-channels changed from > >>"local out of service" to "in service". > >> > >>Once the ARC rebooted, getting fast-busy's dialing in. Checked > >other > >>DSP's and they were all again "local out of service". > >> > >>On the 1st DSP, did an Actions/Commands->Software->Restore and all > >of > >>it's B-channels went "in-service". > >> > >>Did a restore on the rest of the DSP's, and all the B-channels went > >>in-service everywhere, but still getting fast-busy. Gave it about 3 > >>minutes, still fast-busy. > >> > >>On a hunch - did a Hardware reset on the First 4 DSP's. Almost > >>instantly, the 7th and 8th DSP's started taking calls. > >>(?!)Interestingly though - I still get a fast busy when I dial it > >>myself, and the first DSP just got two utilization lights lit and > >>then rebooted itself. Shortly thereafter, most of the B-channels > >>went out of service again and the callers dropped off. But the ARC > >>isn't giving any errors at the console port at this moment. > >> > >>So, for lack of any ability to get and keep users connected, I just > >>reset all the DSP's to the DMS100 switch type, and rebooted the > >>cards. Immediately, callers started connecting. Session Monitor > >>shows EVERY B-channel is up. But for how long? > >> > >>Is the switch-type so far wrong that it just can't function > >>continuously? Is the ARC fried? Is this chassis haunted? > >> > >>Nothing I can say but: WTF? > >> > >>Anyone have any ideas? > >> > >>Thanks, > >> > >>Joel > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>USR-TC mailing list > >>USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > >>http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >USR-TC mailing list > >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > > >_______________________________________________ > >USR-TC mailing list > >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >USR-TC mailing list > >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > USR-TC mailing list > USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > _______________________________________________ > USR-TC mailing list > USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

2 1

Radius / Auth Problem
by Joel - Fox Computers 05 May '03

05 May '03

Got two units, set up almost identical, one with authenticate, the other won't. Here's the setup on the ARC: eth:1, 12.x.x.x internet connection, specified gateway 12.x.x.1 eth:2, 10.10.1.29 local network connection Radius server IP: 10.10.1.22 When I do a "mon rad" on this ARC, the source-Ip is always the 12.x.x.x address, instead of 10.10.1.29. On a different chassis, the radius packets originate from 10.10.1.29 and works fine. Suggestions? Did I miss something in the config? shouldn't it always originate from the eth:2 when the requested address is on the same subnet as the eth:2 connection? - Joel

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] HiperARC issues
by Joel - Fox Computers 05 May '03

05 May '03

This sounds like the EXACT problem i had just recently - See the next email I send in just a bit... -----Original Message----- From: Scott Trautman [mailto:scott@gdinet.com] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 12:30 PM To: 'usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com' Subject: [USR-TC] HiperARC issues Hi, This is my 2nd HiperARC card in the past few months coming up "bad" - running 5.3.3 on several ARCs no problem for long periods of time. Problem #1: - reboots every 1-7 days (at worst possible time usually of course) - upon reboot that first time, takes no calls, although as best I can see no reason it wouldn't (probably ignorance on my part) - reboot again, all is well until next time I seem to recall something about chassis awareness an issue? I'm thinking I need to get another ARC (and I'm sure someone here will help with that) Now I'm also seeing, and thinking it's related, DS0's randomly go "local out of service". Very weirdly then callers get "call cannot be completed as dialed" Set that channel back in service, all is back to normal. I would not have guessed in a million years that a local out of service channel on my end could end up with a "call cannot be completed as dialed". Anyone seen the behavior, and can anyone 'splain to me why the "call...." message? I would have thought busy or dead air. For once the telco was right and it wasn't their problem. Mark that one down. Thanks mucho for any wisdom! SMT Scott Trautman Global Dialog Internet www.gdinet.com 608-240-4638,7fax Internet Service for Southern Wisconsin scott(a)gdinet.com _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

HiperARC issues
by Scott Trautman 05 May '03

05 May '03

Hi, This is my 2nd HiperARC card in the past few months coming up "bad" - running 5.3.3 on several ARCs no problem for long periods of time. Problem #1: - reboots every 1-7 days (at worst possible time usually of course) - upon reboot that first time, takes no calls, although as best I can see no reason it wouldn't (probably ignorance on my part) - reboot again, all is well until next time I seem to recall something about chassis awareness an issue? I'm thinking I need to get another ARC (and I'm sure someone here will help with that) Now I'm also seeing, and thinking it's related, DS0's randomly go "local out of service". Very weirdly then callers get "call cannot be completed as dialed" Set that channel back in service, all is back to normal. I would not have guessed in a million years that a local out of service channel on my end could end up with a "call cannot be completed as dialed". Anyone seen the behavior, and can anyone 'splain to me why the "call...." message? I would have thought busy or dead air. For once the telco was right and it wasn't their problem. Mark that one down. Thanks mucho for any wisdom! SMT Scott Trautman Global Dialog Internet www.gdinet.com 608-240-4638,7fax Internet Service for Southern Wisconsin scott(a)gdinet.com

1 0

Restrict interface for a perticular user
by Anil 05 May '03

05 May '03

Hi , Can i restrict a specific interface (example slot:10/mod:1) to authenticate only for a perticular user and reject access for other users. or is it possible for any user on the authenticate on that perticular interface get a static ip reserved for that perticular interface.. i tried with the commands "set switched interface Slot:x/mod:y user_name" and "set switched interface slot:x/mod:y password" but this allows even other radius users to authenticate to that interface can anyone help me on this Regards Anil

2 1

DC Chassis
by Joshua Coombs 02 May '03

02 May '03

Does anyone have any power figures for a TC1000 chassis using -48v DC power? Ideally I'd like a base chassis draw and then amperage figures for each card type so I can just build out a chassis and 'add up the totals' to estimate power. The most likely config is a chassis with 8 Multispan DSPs, 1 256/32 ARC ][, and a 333 NMC. Joshua Coombs GWI Networking

1 0

33.6k vs 56k
by alex 01 May '03

01 May '03

What do I have to disable on DSPs dialers to get strictly 33.6k without any chance of speed upshifting while staying online? I know that I have to disable: x2 Client Mode; x2 Server Mode; x2 Symmetric Mode; x2 High-power Constellation; V.90 All Digital Mode; V.90 Analogue Mode; V.90 Digital Mode. What about V.8 ? V.8 Call Indicator? etc...

1 0

Syslog messages
by alex 01 May '03

01 May '03

What can this syslog messages mean? Facility "UDP", Level "UNUSUAL":: UDP - checksum error in incoming UDP packet. Facility "UDP", Level "UNUSUAL":: UDP - improper length in UDP packet (got 308, 360 specified). Second I can understand, but what can cause them?

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] Re: confirm 7ed7b16a7d92cddc1e800ca5be2ccde8ecc3420c
by Joel - Fox Computers 01 May '03

01 May '03

I got that too - must have been something wrong over night -----Original Message----- From: Chincogan Network Services Lists [mailto:lists@chincogan.net.au] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 4:29 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] Re: confirm 7ed7b16a7d92cddc1e800ca5be2ccde8ecc3420c On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:10:32 -0600 usr-tc-request(a)mailman.xmission.com wrote: > Your membership in the mailing list USR-TC has been disabled due to > excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated > 30-Apr-2003. You will not get any more messages from this list until > you re-enable your membership. You will receive 3 more reminders like > this before your membership in the list is deleted. > > To re-enable your membership, you can simply respond to this message > (leaving the Subject: line intact), or visit the confirmation page at > > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/confirm/usr-tc/7ed7b16a7d92cddc… > > > You can also visit your membership page at > > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/usr-tc/lists%40chincoga… > > > On your membership page, you can change various delivery options such > as your email address and whether you get digests or not. As a > reminder, your membership password is > > niosmu > > If you have any questions or problems, you can contact the list owner > at > > usr-tc-owner(a)mailman.xmission.com > _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

5 5