May 2002 - USR-TC - mailman.xmission.com

Packing a TC for shipping
by Mohammed Salam 28 May '02

28 May '02

Hi, Anyone know a company in the NYC area who would take a few TCs and pack them for shipping? I am missing the boxes they came with. Thanks.

2 3

RE: [USR-TC] Anyone Looking for Total Control Training???
by Brian Becker 28 May '02

28 May '02

I think I would send an engineer up if the info was more than getting a Box running. Things like: MPIP Initiating MPPP calls from the HiperArc (when our main T1 dies we could use MPPP dialup connection for backup) Filtering And, I'd be happy to have someone there to demo how to use Total Scrutinizer if interested. Brian Brian Becker President, Poplar Bluff Internet, Inc. http://semo.net Home of TotallyFabricated.com Software & Web Design http://TotalScrutinizer.com - Tech Support Just Got Easier! POBox 190 - Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 - 573.686.9114 -----Original Message----- From: usr-tc-admin(a)mailman.xmission.com [mailto:usr-tc-admin@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:08 AM To: usr-tc(a)lists.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] Anyone Looking for Total Control Training??? Since my post last week I have received several inquiries about training. If we can get about 10 of us I know they will put the class on. I am putting together a list of interested parties. Please respond to steverivera(a)wrca.net if you want to be added to the list. ****No times or dates have been set but we can work it out for all us. Usually held at 3com headquarters. Let me know. FYI: Class consists of set-up and config of TC1000 units. According to Commworks most of the time is spent on the hiper arc. Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 IM: srivera711 732-833-2115 fax for more product info got www.wrca.net Jackson, NJ 08527 (USA) _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

2 1

Fw: [USR-TC] Anyone using the May release of v.92?
by Justin Kendall 28 May '02

28 May '02

Sure, As with pretty much anything right out of the box there was a lot of up front configuration to be done. Trunking, templates, etc. But once everything seemed like it was how I wanted it something still wasn't quite right. Intermittent and seemingly random problems included MANY carrier drops where we are used to almost none, DSP's not filling over 20%, cards taking 3 to 4 hours to start accepting calls after booting up, and connect speeds averaging between 1200 and 28000 ( not too hot, I say ). Anyhow, after trying hundreds of configurations and almost resigning myself to swear off networking and join the priesthood we discovered that during the upgrade our Telco had changed our line coding to AMI when we were running B8ZS. I didn't think it would be that big of a deal because I thought it wouldn't even synchronize if the coding was off but it sure made a difference! So by "tweaking" I mean to say that after everything was working correctly our settings look quite different than I had assumed they would when I started the process. By the way, I'm not very familiar with line coding, would there be any reason to use AMI on a T1 if all equipment supports B8ZS? Is there some advantage to it? Cheers, Justin Kendall Network Administrator NetEase, Inc. Santa Rosa, CA jkendall(a)neteze.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Francke" <Oliver.Francke(a)mediaWays.net> To: "Justin Kendall" <jkendall(a)neteze.com> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [USR-TC] Anyone using the May release of v.92? > Hi Justin, > > as I can steal some time to do first testing with the 4.5 release... > > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 01:56:05PM +0100, Justin Kendall wrote: > > The only update I've used since 4.5 is 3.5.100 for DSP and it's working like > > a charm so far. > > Took a lot of tweaking but we're using it on 45 cards now with almost no > > trouble. > > ... what do you mean with "tweaking", perhaps it's even of interest to > the complete mailing-list?! > > Thnx in @vance, Oliver. > > > > > Justin Kendall > > Network Administrator > > NetEase, Inc. > > Santa Rosa, CA > > jkendall(a)neteze.com > > > [...] > > -- > Was hat bei uns die geringste PopulariTAET? > > Oliver.Francke(a)mediaWays.net fon. +49-5246-80-1389 > mob. +49-171-5597734 > I used to have a sig, but I've stopped smoking now. >

3 2

Anyone Looking for Total Control Training???
by Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net 28 May '02

28 May '02

Since my post last week I have received several inquiries about training. If we can get about 10 of us I know they will put the class on. I am putting together a list of interested parties. Please respond to steverivera(a)wrca.net if you want to be added to the list. ****No times or dates have been set but we can work it out for all us. Usually held at 3com headquarters. Let me know. FYI: Class consists of set-up and config of TC1000 units. According to Commworks most of the time is spent on the hiper arc. Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 IM: srivera711 732-833-2115 fax for more product info got www.wrca.net Jackson, NJ 08527 (USA)

1 0

RE: [USR-TC] Changing Radius Ports
by SWujek＠solunet.com 28 May '02

28 May '02

Hi Lisa, Below is the command syntax to change the sourse and destination ports for RADIUS, assuming you are using a HiperARC?? By default most versions of HiperARC code should be defaulted at 1812. set authentication source_port 1812 primary_server x.x.x.x primary_destination_port 1812 primary_secret ******* (use the question mark to find other commands needed)....... Thanks, Steve Solunet TAC -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Casey [mailto:lisa@jellico.net] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 2:27 PM To: usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com Subject: [USR-TC] Changing Radius Ports Hi, How can I change the radius port #'s in a USR Total Control from 1645/1646 to 1812/1813? Thanks, Lisa Casey, Webmaster Netlink 2000, Inc. lisa(a)jellico.net _______________________________________________ USR-TC mailing list USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc

1 0

Re: [USR-TC] Packing a TC for shipping
by Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net 28 May '02

28 May '02

5 Bundles right? I would charge you $500.00 to pick and prepare, box for shipment. Freight would be your responsibility. We can bill recipient and 3rd party accounts. At 10:19 AM 5/25/2002 +0600, you wrote: >Can you give me an idea as to how much your charges will be for just packing >them. I have about five of them. > >These are TCs with separate cooling units. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Stephen Rivera - WRCA.Net" <steverivera(a)wrca.net> >To: <usr-tc(a)mailman.xmission.com> >Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:59 AM >Subject: Re: [USR-TC] Packing a TC for shipping > > > > I'm in NJ. I would be willing to run into the city, bring them back to New > > Jersey. Box and ship them for you. We foam pack here so they will be safe > > for shipment anywhere. > > > > Contact me and we can work it out. > > > > > > At 12:09 AM 5/23/2002 +0600, you wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >Anyone know a company in the NYC area who would take a few TCs and pack > > >them for shipping? I am missing the boxes they came with. > > > > > >Thanks. > > > > > > Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 > > IM: srivera711 732-833-2115 fax > > for more product info got www.wrca.net > > Jackson, NJ 08527 (USA) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > USR-TC mailing list > > USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com > > http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc > > > > >_______________________________________________ >USR-TC mailing list >USR-TC(a)mailman.xmission.com >http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usr-tc Steve Rivera 732-833-2111 x102 IM: srivera711 732-833-2115 fax for more product info got www.wrca.net Jackson, NJ 08527 (USA)

1 0

Changing Radius Ports
by Lisa Casey 27 May '02

27 May '02

Hi, How can I change the radius port #'s in a USR Total Control from 1645/1646 to 1812/1813? Thanks, Lisa Casey, Webmaster Netlink 2000, Inc. lisa(a)jellico.net

1 0

interface originating ip for radius
by Jose Orlando T. Ribeiro 27 May '02

27 May '02

hello! I was using a HiArc with a wan serial interface as gateway. Everithing worked fine. Then we used at another site a HiArc with two wan interface for a higher traffic capability. So during my testes I noted that we dial-in users weren't being authenticated. Using monitor radius I could see that the RAS was sending authentication requests but there wasn't any answer from the radius. Then I changed the radius to my machine and started to capture incoming radius packets and I could see that the originating ip field was from the Hi-Arc's wan-serial, not from the ethernet interface (that was listed in the radius as the originating ip). To obtain a fast workaround I used the following commands: set ip application radius "eth:1_ip_address" set ip application ping "eth:1_ip_address" set ip application trace "eth:1_ip_address" now radius, ping and traceroute packets coming from this HiArc come with the ip from eth:1 as I needed. My question is: why that problem just appears with two wan interfaces connected? I looked the configuration from both sites and they were just the same (except that one is using twom wan interfaces). Any help is appreciated! TIA orlando -- ,~~v~~, ,~~v~~, ,'. .', ,'. .', === + === === + === / ~ \ / ~ \ /\_m m_/\ /\_m m_/\ .\ +----------------------+ /. / ! jorlando(a)uol.com.br ! \ / +----------------------+ \ `\m/ \m/' `\m/ \m/'

1 0

cant browse some site
by Gen Camiling 27 May '02

27 May '02

Indeed it was a MTU issue....Cistron-Radius was set at 576 while the default on the HARC is 1574. Browsing issue is solved. -- Best regards, Gen ================================== Gen Camiling Chief Technical Officer International Micro Village, Inc. PHILIPPINES (63)(2) 7512130 mailto:gcamiling@imvi.com.ph ==================================

1 0

can't browse to some sites
by Gen Camiling 24 May '02

24 May '02

I think Jeff you're correct i need to check the MTU settings of the HARC and the Cistron-Radius client is using. I remember the same problem posted before on the mailing list...and it was indeed the MTU setting. Thanks for clearing off the dust in my memory. Will give feedback if issue was resolve. -- Best regards, Gen ================================== Gen Camiling Chief Technical Officer International Micro Village, Inc. PHILIPPINES (63)(2) 7512130 mailto:gcamiling@imvi.com.ph ==================================

1 0