why did you reply?? light bulb is turning on in that bucket of sludge isn't it?
From: rv <krapola@shaw.ca> To: 'C W' <marsbars444@hotmail.com>, TMead17327@aol.com, police@mailman.xmission.com Subject: RE: [Police] 1st amendment Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:43:43 -0700
THEN WHY DON'T you, IDIOT!!! Why reply if you don't like what he wrote? Why don't YOU IGNORE IT. Irony at its best. Ross
-----Original Message----- From: police-bounces+krapola=shaw.ca@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:police-bounces+krapola=shaw.ca@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of C W Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:50 PM To: TMead17327@aol.com; police@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [Police] 1st amendment
I am not exercising my 1st amendment right to be a jerk. You are. Who is calling you a jerk? In simpler terms so that your brian can understand: IF you don't like something someone posts, ignore it.
From: TMead17327@aol.com To: police@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: [Police] 1st amendment Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:48:09 EDT
So you are free to exercise your 1st amendment right to be a jerk when you don't agree with a post, but I'm not?
Thanks for clearing that up.
Tommy
In a message dated 4/19/2005 3:31:12 PM Mountain Daylight Time, marsbars444@hotmail.com writes:
just ignore the post jerkoff
_______________________________________________ Police mailing list Police@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/police
_______________________________________________ Police mailing list Police@mailman.xmission.com http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/police