Things to look for in a used M-17
Dear all, I am new to this list, but I am thinking of buying a 1975 M-17, hull #55. Unfortunately this boat is too far for me to inspect personally, so all I can do is rely on the seller's description and photos. According to them, the boat was extremely well mainained, and from the first few photos I saw this seems to be the case. If anything, what are the things to look at, and/or to request pictures of? What are the common problem areas of the boat? Another rather important question is the following: I currently have a Compac 16, which I can rig myself without any help in 20-30 minutes (I keep it on the trailer, and this is the time I need from arriving at the dock with the boat on the trailer, until I am sailing). Is the same possible with the M-17? Namely, can an average guy (age 36) rig all by himself, and how long would this take? Thanks a lot, Andrei.
Hi Andrei, I found it takes a bit longer with the M17 as the mast is heavier then the compac and there are more stays which tends to complicate things a bit. I have to have help to put the mast up or else put together a better system. The compac mast was light enough where it only took moments to get the mast up. As for things to look for, pretty much the same as any other boat, but pay particular attention to the centerboard/keel, if you look through the posts on this forum and on a couple of web sites you will find that the ballast in the older boats is steel and the keel is cast iron. Both of which can rust which would swell and could potentially jam the centerboard in either the up (if on a trailer) or down (if in the water) position. Either of which can get expensive or labor intensive pretty quick. --Chad On Jun 4, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Andrei Caldararu wrote:
Dear all,
I am new to this list, but I am thinking of buying a 1975 M-17, hull #55. Unfortunately this boat is too far for me to inspect personally, so all I can do is rely on the seller's description and photos. According to them, the boat was extremely well mainained, and from the first few photos I saw this seems to be the case.
If anything, what are the things to look at, and/or to request pictures of? What are the common problem areas of the boat?
Another rather important question is the following: I currently have a Compac 16, which I can rig myself without any help in 20-30 minutes (I keep it on the trailer, and this is the time I need from arriving at the dock with the boat on the trailer, until I am sailing). Is the same possible with the M-17? Namely, can an average guy (age 36) rig all by himself, and how long would this take?
Thanks a lot,
Andrei.
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Hi Chad, thanks for the comments. The people selling the M-17 are not the owners -- the owner passed away and they are his children selling the boat. I'll ask them to check that the centerboard moves freely, although as the boat is now on a trailer this may be difficult. The boat seems to have been stored in a dry area though, with a cover on it. I get it that you had a CP-16 before the M-17. How would you compare the two boats? Was the M-17 the fantastic improvement everyone seems to be saying it is? Especially, how do you compare the build quality of the two? Mine is a 1985 CP-16 Mark 1 (no centerboard, no bowsprit), but it is in great condition, you couldn't tell this is a 23 years old boat; other boats I've looked at (Precisions in particular) all had their share of gelcoat cracking, repairs, etc., while the Compac is like new. Is this the same experience you had with the M-17? The price difference between the CP-16 and the M-17 is quite a bit, the M-17 is almost double the CP-16. When you say a better system for raising the mast, do you mean a crutch at the front with pulleys, or a similar system? With this, how long does it take you to rig? Thanks, Andrei.
The lake where I sail has an active sailing club....boats of all kinds and sizes, but my M17 is one of the smaller ones. We had a group event a few years ago and someone with a Compac 16 showed up as a guest. We did a group sail to a destination about 10 miles off. To keep the fleet together, they sent the two of us smaller boats off first. I led the fleet the whole way, the bigger 30 footers finally caught up with me in the open water near the end of the run. The entire fleet passed him, later to send somebody back to tow him up to where I was (by motor), where the entire fleet passed him again. He eventually made it. Don't know if it was the boat or the skipper, but it wasn't a good showing. As for rigging the boat, I'm slow.....errrr....deliberate, and it seldom takes me more than an hour to rig and launch from the time I hit the lot with the mast down. Single handed. Raising and lowering the mast is the single biggest job, and there are tricks to help with that. I've never owned an M15, but have been on a couple. They are a sailing dream. Easy to tack, point well and are very fast. For only 2 feet difference in length, the size difference is remarkable. If you hop off one onto the other, you certainly notice it. Not better or worse, just different. Howard On Jun 4, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Andrei Caldararu wrote:
Hi Chad,
thanks for the comments. The people selling the M-17 are not the owners -- the owner passed away and they are his children selling the boat. I'll ask them to check that the centerboard moves freely, although as the boat is now on a trailer this may be difficult. The boat seems to have been stored in a dry area though, with a cover on it.
I get it that you had a CP-16 before the M-17. How would you compare the two boats? Was the M-17 the fantastic improvement everyone seems to be saying it is? Especially, how do you compare the build quality of the two? Mine is a 1985 CP-16 Mark 1 (no centerboard, no bowsprit), but it is in great condition, you couldn't tell this is a 23 years old boat; other boats I've looked at (Precisions in particular) all had their share of gelcoat cracking, repairs, etc., while the Compac is like new. Is this the same experience you had with the M-17? The price difference between the CP-16 and the M-17 is quite a bit, the M-17 is almost double the CP-16.
When you say a better system for raising the mast, do you mean a crutch at the front with pulleys, or a similar system? With this, how long does it take you to rig?
Thanks,
Andrei.
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
I want to set the mast rake on my M-17. I have new standing rigging but need to make some major adjustments to the mast position. Do any of you more experienced sailors have some rules of thumb or specifics on setting the mast rake? Also, I have a set of four stock aluminum sheaves that Bob Eeg was kind enough to include with four slightly modified sheaves that I used for my new rope halyards. I would like to pass these four stock sheaves along to someone that can use them. Please let me know if you want them off the list at robbin.roddewig@verizon.net Thanks Robbin M-17 #056
.....and I would like to add to this.....other than the water line....is there a level reference in a 17? Cockpit sole, bench seats etc? Save me getting some clear hose to level to the WL...... Tim. -----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of robbin roddewig Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:55 AM To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats Subject: M_Boats: Mast rake on M-17 plus free sheaves I want to set the mast rake on my M-17. I have new standing rigging but need to make some major adjustments to the mast position. Do any of you more experienced sailors have some rules of thumb or specifics on setting the mast rake? Also, I have a set of four stock aluminum sheaves that Bob Eeg was kind enough to include with four slightly modified sheaves that I used for my new rope halyards. I would like to pass these four stock sheaves along to someone that can use them. Please let me know if you want them off the list at robbin.roddewig@verizon.net Thanks Robbin M-17 #056
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.6/1481 - Release Date: 6/3/2008 7:31 PM
Hi: Could somebody knowledgeable respond to these questions? I know there is a piece by Jerry about 'mast rake' on the Monty site, but I could not find anything about the level reference. Also, what is the optimum heel angle for the M17? Thanks in advance, cheers, Shawn Boles Grey Mist (M17 #276 1978) -----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Tim Diebert Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:04 AM To: 'For and about Montgomery Sailboats' Subject: Re: M_Boats: Mast rake on M-17 plus free sheaves .....and I would like to add to this.....other than the water line....is there a level reference in a 17? Cockpit sole, bench seats etc? Save me getting some clear hose to level to the WL...... Tim. -----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of robbin roddewig Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:55 AM To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats Subject: M_Boats: Mast rake on M-17 plus free sheaves I want to set the mast rake on my M-17. I have new standing rigging but need to make some major adjustments to the mast position. Do any of you more experienced sailors have some rules of thumb or specifics on setting the mast rake? Also, I have a set of four stock aluminum sheaves that Bob Eeg was kind enough to include with four slightly modified sheaves that I used for my new rope halyards. I would like to pass these four stock sheaves along to someone that can use them. Please let me know if you want them off the list at robbin.roddewig@verizon.net Thanks Robbin M-17 #056
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.6/1481 - Release Date: 6/3/2008 7:31 PM _______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
For reference to Shawn's comments: http://www.msog.org/how-to/mastrake.cfm I suspect the cockpit sole slopes a bit aft to drain. I always used the cockpit seats as a check on level (fore and aft). Once you think the boat is level, fore and aft, you can hang a weight from the main halyard as a plumb bob to check on rake (easier to do on the trailer). Starting place is about 6 to 8 inches from the tack fitting on the boom (M17). But it's trial and error "feel" beyond that. Optimum angle of heel? I think my boat goes the fastest around 15 degrees. Not much, if any, increase in speed over that and by 20 degrees, I'm ready to reef. Going to weather, she won't be much slower, but less rounding up and more in control (we rarely have steady winds.....if it's blowing a steady 20, the gusts mixed in are up to 30). A friend and I were out one day and he wanted to see how much she would take. We did a stretch heeled over to 30 degrees. A lot of strain on everything (including me), but no more speed. In fact, I think she slowed down. Howard On Jun 6, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Shawn Boles wrote:
Hi:
Could somebody knowledgeable respond to these questions? I know there is a piece by Jerry about 'mast rake' on the Monty site, but I could not find anything about the level reference. Also, what is the optimum heel angle for the M17?
Thanks in advance,
cheers, Shawn Boles Grey Mist (M17 #276 1978)
-----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Tim Diebert Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 6:04 AM To: 'For and about Montgomery Sailboats' Subject: Re: M_Boats: Mast rake on M-17 plus free sheaves
.....and I would like to add to this.....other than the water line....is there a level reference in a 17? Cockpit sole, bench seats etc? Save me getting some clear hose to level to the WL...... Tim.
-----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of robbin roddewig Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:55 AM To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats Subject: M_Boats: Mast rake on M-17 plus free sheaves
I want to set the mast rake on my M-17. I have new standing rigging but
need to make some major adjustments to the mast position. Do any of you
more experienced sailors have some rules of thumb or specifics on setting the mast rake? Also, I have a set of four stock aluminum sheaves that Bob Eeg was kind enough to include with four slightly modified sheaves that I used for my
new rope halyards. I would like to pass these four stock sheaves along to someone that can use them. Please let me know if you want them off the list at robbin.roddewig@verizon.net
Thanks Robbin M-17 #056
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.6/1481 - Release Date: 6/3/2008 7:31 PM
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
From my home, to the launch ramp lot, rigged and ready to go in takes me an hour. The drive is five minutes. Unrigging takes the same time. Like Howard, I am deliberate and enjoy the whole process. To raise the mast (M17) I made a gin pole. I can raise the mast without, but feel more relaxed doing it this way. I don't use the gin pole to lower the mast. I never need help and am not sure where it would be useful anyway.
I tow with a V6 van, but am looking towards an 4 cyl. SUV/ wagon kind of rig. The Subaru Forester sounds good. The Jeep sounds good. Had a Subaru 4X wagon one back in the early 90's......what a weird little car.....but it would go anywhere. Tim ========================== -----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Howard Audsley Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:57 AM To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats Subject: Re: M_Boats: Things to look for in a used M-17 The lake where I sail has an active sailing club....boats of all kinds and sizes, but my M17 is one of the smaller ones. We had a group event a few years ago and someone with a Compac 16 showed up as a guest. We did a group sail to a destination about 10 miles off. To keep the fleet together, they sent the two of us smaller boats off first. I led the fleet the whole way, the bigger 30 footers finally caught up with me in the open water near the end of the run. The entire fleet passed him, later to send somebody back to tow him up to where I was (by motor), where the entire fleet passed him again. He eventually made it. Don't know if it was the boat or the skipper, but it wasn't a good showing. As for rigging the boat, I'm slow.....errrr....deliberate, and it seldom takes me more than an hour to rig and launch from the time I hit the lot with the mast down. Single handed. Raising and lowering the mast is the single biggest job, and there are tricks to help with that. I've never owned an M15, but have been on a couple. They are a sailing dream. Easy to tack, point well and are very fast. For only 2 feet difference in length, the size difference is remarkable. If you hop off one onto the other, you certainly notice it. Not better or worse, just different. Howard On Jun 4, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Andrei Caldararu wrote:
Hi Chad,
thanks for the comments. The people selling the M-17 are not the owners -- the owner passed away and they are his children selling the boat. I'll ask them to check that the centerboard moves freely, although as the boat is now on a trailer this may be difficult. The boat seems to have been stored in a dry area though, with a cover on it.
I get it that you had a CP-16 before the M-17. How would you compare the two boats? Was the M-17 the fantastic improvement everyone seems to be saying it is? Especially, how do you compare the build quality of the two? Mine is a 1985 CP-16 Mark 1 (no centerboard, no bowsprit), but it is in great condition, you couldn't tell this is a 23 years old boat; other boats I've looked at (Precisions in particular) all had their share of gelcoat cracking, repairs, etc., while the Compac is like new. Is this the same experience you had with the M-17? The price difference between the CP-16 and the M-17 is quite a bit, the M-17 is almost double the CP-16.
When you say a better system for raising the mast, do you mean a crutch at the front with pulleys, or a similar system? With this, how long does it take you to rig?
Thanks,
Andrei.
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.6/1481 - Release Date: 6/3/2008 7:31 PM
Hello all, from what I hear from everyone, it seems like the M-17 is a bit too hard to single handedly rig and launch in a short time: I understand I should expect 45 minutes to rig/derig, and need two people. I would have liked to be on the water in 20-30 minutes, alone. Is the M-15 better in this respect? And, perhaps more importantly, how can one find a good condition M-15 in the midwest? (I am in Wisconsin, but I am willing to travel within 250 miles of here.) Thanks, Andrei.
Hi Andrei, i haven't been reading the previous posts but i can rig my M17 in less than 30 minutes by myself. And i can single hand her rather easily and i am not even an "old salt" ... but i am old (51). I would guess i could rig her on my own for at least the next five years (if i keep her... i am seriously thinking of parting with her... first $4500 takes her ... Sacramento area... sorry about the impromptu sales pitch). Jeff M17 Hull #336 Andrei Caldararu <andreic@math.wisc.edu> wrote: Hello all, from what I hear from everyone, it seems like the M-17 is a bit too hard to single handedly rig and launch in a short time: I understand I should expect 45 minutes to rig/derig, and need two people. I would have liked to be on the water in 20-30 minutes, alone. Is the M-15 better in this respect? And, perhaps more importantly, how can one find a good condition M-15 in the midwest? (I am in Wisconsin, but I am willing to travel within 250 miles of here.) Thanks, Andrei. _______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Too bad Sacramento is even farther away than Utah.... Nobody in the Midwest willing to part with an M-15 or M-17? Andrei.
Andrei: I'm not willing to part with my M-17, but I'd be happy to show her to you and, if the weather cooperates, take you on a test sail. Gordon 1983 M-17 "Sapphire" Milwaukee On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Andrei Caldararu wrote:
Too bad Sacramento is even farther away than Utah.... Nobody in the Midwest willing to part with an M-15 or M-17?
Andrei.
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Back to your original question, yes, the M15 is significantly easier to travel with and rig than the M17. If I was traveling a lot to different sailing locations and not spending a lot of time at any of them, the M15 (in my opinion) is a better idea. But I would also argue with the idea that it's important to be able to do put up the rig and launch an M17 in 30 minutes. Why not enjoy the process as an extension of the sailing experience? And it can be made easy--much easier than lifting the mast by yourself and walking it up and all that. A couple simple lifting aids and the single hander's mast can go up and down in a very slow, controlled way. Rigging our M17 takes an hour or more, but it's a leisurely, stress-free experience (which I'm sure the 30 minute drill is as well, but I'm into long bike rides, thick books, old scotch, etc.) punctuated by frequent beer breaks, girl watching, and general gazing into space. t
Andrei, It's kind of a non sequitor, but Tom's post reminds me of one of the problems when rigging the boat. It's the dogon people who want to talk about a Montgomery. They think that the boat is the neatest thing they have seen. Steve On Jun 4, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Tom Smith wrote:
Back to your original question, yes, the M15 is significantly easier to travel with and rig than the M17. If I was traveling a lot to different sailing locations and not spending a lot of time at any of them, the M15 (in my opinion) is a better idea.
But I would also argue with the idea that it's important to be able to do put up the rig and launch an M17 in 30 minutes. Why not enjoy the process as an extension of the sailing experience? And it can be made easy--much easier than lifting the mast by yourself and walking it up and all that. A couple simple lifting aids and the single hander's mast can go up and down in a very slow, controlled way.
Rigging our M17 takes an hour or more, but it's a leisurely, stress-free experience (which I'm sure the 30 minute drill is as well, but I'm into long bike rides, thick books, old scotch, etc.) punctuated by frequent beer breaks, girl watching, and general gazing into space.
t
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Andrei, When I was making the decision between a M15 and M17, I spoke with Jerry Montgomery. His words of advice were to "buy the 15, you'll sail more". To rig a M15 takes 20 to 30 minutes and can be done by one reasonably healthy individual. Steve On Jun 4, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Andrei Caldararu wrote:
Hello all,
from what I hear from everyone, it seems like the M-17 is a bit too hard to single handedly rig and launch in a short time: I understand I should expect 45 minutes to rig/derig, and need two people. I would have liked to be on the water in 20-30 minutes, alone. Is the M-15 better in this respect?
And, perhaps more importantly, how can one find a good condition M-15 in the midwest? (I am in Wisconsin, but I am willing to travel within 250 miles of here.)
Thanks,
Andrei.
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Andrei, Whether you need to people to rig (or alternatively more gear) depends on yourself. I have no trouble raising the mast myself without help or winching it. As to the time, that varies a lot from person to person too and goodness knows I'm at the slow end of the spectrum so 45 minutes would be a good time for me. I'll bet there are people who could make the 30 minute mark, though. Tod Mills M17 #408, 1987 galley model BuscaBrisas -----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Andrei Caldararu Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:58 PM To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats Subject: M_Boats: Perhaps the M-17 is not for me... M-15? Hello all, from what I hear from everyone, it seems like the M-17 is a bit too hard to single handedly rig and launch in a short time: I understand I should expect 45 minutes to rig/derig, and need two people. I would have liked to be on the water in 20-30 minutes, alone. Is the M-15 better in this respect? And, perhaps more importantly, how can one find a good condition M-15 in the midwest? (I am in Wisconsin, but I am willing to travel within 250 miles of here.) Thanks, Andrei. _______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1476 - Release Date: 5/31/2008 12:25 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1476 - Release Date: 5/31/2008 12:25 PM
Andrei, More to the point, if I had to rig the boat every time I wanted to sail it, then no question, a 15. I leave my 17 rigged, on her trailer, so I don't mess with the mast each time... Tod Mills M17 #408, 1987 galley model BuscaBrisas No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1476 - Release Date: 5/31/2008 12:25 PM
Andrei, I have a 2007 M15 in Northern Indiana, about two hours out of Chicago. It will transported to our new home in Houston in the next couple of months. You are welcome to come and look at it if interested. Not really interested in selling it, unless you wanted to pay nearly new price so I can buy a M17 from Bob to put on the Gulf. joe moore Andrei Caldararu wrote:
Hello all,
from what I hear from everyone, it seems like the M-17 is a bit too hard to single handedly rig and launch in a short time: I understand I should expect 45 minutes to rig/derig, and need two people. I would have liked to be on the water in 20-30 minutes, alone. Is the M-15 better in this respect?
And, perhaps more importantly, how can one find a good condition M-15 in the midwest? (I am in Wisconsin, but I am willing to travel within 250 miles of here.)
Thanks,
Andrei.
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Hi Andrei, When I was looking for an M15, the one I tried to buy was in Sacramento, CA (I live in Glastonbury, CT) The owner was willing to drive East and deliver it for a very reasonable price. However, as I jumped at it and said, I'll take it, he came back with, ....I can't sell my M15. I love it too much....! He then put me in touch with a West Coast publication, LATITUDE 39, which had two ads for M15s. One in Sauselito, CA and the second one in Panama City, FL (owned by a man in Sauselito, CA) After a long telephone call with him I bought it sight-unseen (I have no qualms about doing any kind of fiberglass or other mechanical work, having done that on previous boats). I drove to Panama City, picked up the boat and when I was back in Connecticut examined what I had bought. It matched all the specs and condition we had discussed. It came with an almost new HONDA 2 HP engine. The major worry were cracks in the tire sidewalls, and we tried to buy new tires in Panama City, but the trailer store didn't have any of the right size. They looked at the tires and said, they were fine, ..... and they were. I had no problem at all driving back North. So, if you want an M15, be prepared to travel to get it: and don't dither too much or it will have been bought by someone else.... Connie ex M15 #400 LEPPO Andrei Caldararu <andreic@math.wisc.edu> wrote: Hello all, from what I hear from everyone, it seems like the M-17 is a bit too hard to single handedly rig and launch in a short time: I understand I should expect 45 minutes to rig/derig, and need two people. I would have liked to be on the water in 20-30 minutes, alone. Is the M-15 better in this respect? And, perhaps more importantly, how can one find a good condition M-15 in the midwest? (I am in Wisconsin, but I am willing to travel within 250 miles of here.) Thanks, Andrei. _______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
It is easer to rig the 17 with out my kids help than with it. I would not pas up a 17 because of set up time or efort. I live in Superior, WI if you can make it here I will take you saling. Dale -----Original Message----- From: Andrei Caldararu <andreic@math.wisc.edu> To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 3:58 pm Subject: M_Boats: Perhaps the M-17 is not for me... M-15? Hello all, from what I hear from everyone, it seems like the M-17 is a bit too hard to single handedly rig and launch in a short time: I understand I should expect 45 minutes to rig/derig, and need two people. I would have liked to be on the water in 20-30 minutes, alone. Is the M-15 better in this respect? And, perhaps more importantly, how can one find a good condition M-15 in the midwest? (I am in Wisconsin, but I am willing to travel within 250 miles of here.) Thanks, Andrei. _______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Andrei I recommend hiring a Marine Surveyor before buying a 33 year old boat, site unseen. The few hundred it will cost you is money well spent. You never know about the ballast condition or any deck core rot...etc. Also, you want to know how old the sails and rigging are. Bob
From: andreic@math.wisc.edu> To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:39:30 -0500> Subject: M_Boats: Things to look for in a used M-17> > Dear all,> > I am new to this list, but I am thinking of buying a 1975 M-17, hull > #55. Unfortunately this boat is too far for me to inspect personally, > so all I can do is rely on the seller's description and photos. > According to them, the boat was extremely well mainained, and from the > first few photos I saw this seems to be the case.> > If anything, what are the things to look at, and/or to request > pictures of? What are the common problem areas of the boat?> > Another rather important question is the following: I currently have a > Compac 16, which I can rig myself without any help in 20-30 minutes (I > keep it on the trailer, and this is the time I need from arriving at > the dock with the boat on the trailer, until I am sailing). Is the > same possible with the M-17? Namely, can an average guy (age 36) rig > all by himself, and how long would this take?> > Thanks a lot,> > Andrei.> > > _______________________________________________> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Andrei I recommend hiring a Marine Surveyor before buying a 33 year old boat, site unseen. The few hundred it will cost you is money well spent. You never know about the ballast condition or any deck core rot...etc. Also, you want to know how old the sails and rigging are. Bob
From: andreic@math.wisc.edu> To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:39:30 -0500> Subject: M_Boats: Things to look for in a used M-17> > Dear all,> > I am new to this list, but I am thinking of buying a 1975 M-17, hull > #55. Unfortunately this boat is too far for me to inspect personally, > so all I can do is rely on the seller's description and photos. > According to them, the boat was extremely well mainained, and from the > first few photos I saw this seems to be the case.> > If anything, what are the things to look at, and/or to request > pictures of? What are the common problem areas of the boat?> > Another rather important question is the following: I currently have a > Compac 16, which I can rig myself without any help in 20-30 minutes (I > keep it on the trailer, and this is the time I need from arriving at > the dock with the boat on the trailer, until I am sailing). Is the > same possible with the M-17? Namely, can an average guy (age 36) rig > all by himself, and how long would this take?> > Thanks a lot,> > Andrei.> > > _______________________________________________> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
Andrei I recommend hiring a Marine Surveyor before buying a 33 year old boat, site unseen. The few hundred it will cost you is money well spent. You never know about the ballast condition or any deck core rot...etc. Also, you want to know how old the sails and rigging are. Bob PS the difference in sailing characteristics between a Compac and a Montgomery is dramatic.
From: andreic@math.wisc.edu> To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 13:39:30 -0500> Subject: M_Boats: Things to look for in a used M-17> > Dear all,> > I am new to this list, but I am thinking of buying a 1975 M-17, hull > #55. Unfortunately this boat is too far for me to inspect personally, > so all I can do is rely on the seller's description and photos. > According to them, the boat was extremely well mainained, and from the > first few photos I saw this seems to be the case.> > If anything, what are the things to look at, and/or to request > pictures of? What are the common problem areas of the boat?> > Another rather important question is the following: I currently have a > Compac 16, which I can rig myself without any help in 20-30 minutes (I > keep it on the trailer, and this is the time I need from arriving at > the dock with the boat on the trailer, until I am sailing). Is the > same possible with the M-17? Namely, can an average guy (age 36) rig > all by himself, and how long would this take?> > Thanks a lot,> > Andrei.> > > _______________________________________________> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
participants (15)
-
Andrei Caldararu -
Bob From California -
Chad Parrish -
Conbert H Benneck -
Gordon Gilbert -
Howard Audsley -
htmills@zoominternet.net -
Jeff Royce -
Joe Moore -
nummij@aol.com -
robbin roddewig -
Shawn Boles -
Steve and Diana Parsons -
Tim Diebert -
Tom Smith