Well actually I've reefed my furling headsail down to storm jib size and I think it works pretty well. I don't expect great performance in a storm, but it gets the job done. --Gary On Feb 11, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Doug Kelch wrote:
I came accross a comment on roller reefing sail size at http://www.yachtworks.net/Store/headsail_furling.htm
and thought I would share it for the discussion.
" Sail Selection One area of caution: we think you can effectively reduce your headsail area by about 30%-from a 130% to a 100%-but not much further. We've all seen ads in sailing magazines which imply that your 150% genoa can be rolled into a storm jib, but that is nonsense. If you sail in an area where the prevailing winds are light in one season and heavy in another, you'll probably want two furling headsails: a 135% and a 110%, for example. "
Thanks
Doug Kelch
Tom Jenkins <tjenk@gte.net> wrote: Gary,
Got a question on CDI furlers. I think a furler is a great idea for boats kept in a slip or stored mast-up on a trailer, but I would like the option of removing the setup for long trips with lots of stops at different lakes. Seems like this would save wear and tear on my body and the equipment. I bought my boat with the furler installed, so I am wondering if the headstay can be removed by taking off the anti-rotation strap, removing the drum cover and turnbuckle, and slipping the stay out the top of the luff extrusion. According to my reasoning (= wishful thinking), the sail would be left furled on the luff during this procedure, and the stay could be easily re-inserted from the top to activate the rig again. Am I missing anything? Thanks for any advice you can offer.
Tom Jenkins M17 Scintilla
-----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Gary M Hyde Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:38 PM To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats Subject: Re: M_Boats: Furler jib
Rick: I went with the 150 because I sail in a lot of light summer air too. Elliot-Pattinson made me a good sail. I had the foam added because we forgot it in the initial order. I also had the sun shield (I guess you call it that) to protect the sail when it's rolled up. --Gary On Feb 7, 2008, at 5:12 PM, JDavies104@aol.com wrote:
Gary,
Thanks for the input, and that brings up another decision - should I go for a 135% or a 150%? The price difference is pretty small, and the 150% would give better sailing in the Mid-Atlantic doldrums of July and August. I had thought that the limit of effective reefing was around a 25% reduction, which, starting with a 150% still leaves a lot of sail up. I'm hoping to use the sail over a wide range of conditions single-handing, so it seemed that the 135% might be the best compromise, but maybe I need to rethink it.
Thanks,
Rick
************** Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp0030000 0002548
) _______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
_______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
--------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. _______________________________________________ http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats