I apologize for bringing up an already much discussed topic. I am downsizing my outboard motor. I have a 1978 M-17 with the cutout for the engine. I currently have an extra long shaft mounted directly to the transom. The 2.5 hp engines are not available in a long shaft let alone an extra long shaft. Do I even need a long shaft or can I mount an engine bracket to drop the engine? Will I have to lean over the back of the transom to operate? Will having a bracket set back from the transom trump lowering the engine weight by getting smaller engine? Randy Wirth randy@caffeibis.com -----Original Message----- From: montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com [mailto:montgomery_boats-bounces@mailman.xmission.com] On Behalf Of montgomery_boats-request@mailman.xmission.com Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:40 PM To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com Subject: montgomery_boats Digest, Vol 110, Issue 8 Send montgomery_boats mailing list submissions to montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to montgomery_boats-request@mailman.xmission.com You can reach the person managing the list at montgomery_boats-owner@mailman.xmission.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of montgomery_boats digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Loose Foot vs Bolt Rope Foot (Bill Wickett) 2. Re: Outhaul (wcampion@aol.com) 3. Re: Outhaul (Jeffrey Johnston) 4. Loose Foot vs Bolt Rope Foot (Rick Davies) 5. Re: Loose Foot vs Bolt Rope Foot (Bill Wickett) 6. Re: Loose Foot vs Bolt Rope Foot (GILASAILR@aol.com) 7. Re: Pop rivets? (Joe Murphy) 8. Re: Responding to queries on the forum (Tom Smith) 9. Re: Pop rivets? (eisenee@aol.com) 10. Re: Pop rivets? (jslubliner@aol.com) 11. Re: Pop rivets? (GILASAILR@aol.com) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:44:57 -0400 From: Bill Wickett <billwick@gmail.com> To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Loose Foot vs Bolt Rope Foot Message-ID: <CAFd5cDmHZkg+cPbRGDp4VgxZg4XTTFc0kVvo+hgip71o_=vOpQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Rick, Easy answer - don't detach the outhaul or the mainsail, all season long. If you rig everytime you sail, leave your main on the boom, flaked and tied. Stow it in the cabin like that. One less thing to do when rigging or tearing down. We mostly drysail from yard, launching each time, and leave the boat completely rigged including a sailcover over the main,and the jib of the day in a sail bag at the bow. When we do travel, we leave the main on the boom. Put the sail on the boom, run the outhaul line through the clew, with a figure 8 knot through the padeye. If you do want to take off the sail each time, you will have to look for a small snap hook. Small enough to pull through the clew cringle (eye). Or tie in a knot each time. My loose footed main has a 3" long metalslug at the clew in the sail groove. It slides pretty well with a yearly waxing. If I didn't have that, guess I would have a strap through the clew cringle and around the boom. When we do stow the boom with sail, we leave the topping lift attached, until the boom is in the cabin. Makes it a very easy job for the Admiral. One end is supported. Julie lifts the gooseneck out, steps down into the cabin and guides the boom in. Then she detaches the topping lift. She hooks it up first thing when we start rigging again. Bill Wickett Makin' Time M17 #622 On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Rick Davies <jdavies104@gmail.com> wrote:
Bill,
In the Harken 4:1 external, how is the clew connected? In the diagram both ends of the line are dead-ended - one end to the eyestrap and the other to the moving block. It appears to pass through the clew cringle. But then the clew would not be detachable. What obvious point am I missing?
Rick M-17 #633 Lynne L
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012, Bill Wickett <billwick@gmail.com> wrote:
Not to hard to make an outhaul. Can be as simple as a cheek block and a cleat. The block would be at the aft end of the boom, to turn the outhaul line so it can be cleated farther up the boom. We have an 1-1/8" diameter block there. Mounted as far aft as possible, just beside the groove. I think it is a Harken #092 Bullet Block. Could also use a slightly larger diameter 1 1/2" Harken #132. Both use #10 machine screws. You will have to drill the boom 2 x and then tap the hole. You can get a #10 tap at auto parts store. Mount a 3" horn cleat or a small cam cleat about 12" forward from that. Again, drill and tap for the screws. Bed the hardware with Lifecaulk, or 4200.
If you want to have a bit more mechanical advantage 4:1, use a second single block on a second line from a small padeye to the cleat.
Hard to write it out. Go here to see the picture http://www.harken.com/rigtips/Outhaul.php
Even cruising, having the control of the foot makes a difference. Doesn't take much tweaking to get more power.
Bill Wickett Makin' Time M17 #622
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jeffrey Johnston <frjeff@gmail.com> wrote:
As I am ready to order new sails for My Monty 15, I have been reading everything I can about sail configuration for this boat and listening to much advice herein. Many indicate that I should go with a loose footed main (presumably, giving far better sail shape control).
However, I have recently read somewhere that it takes some modification/additions to the outhaul to effectively use the loose footed style. I believe the reference was to some sort of block arrangement to give greater purchase when tightening the foot.
My rig is the old standard with a track/slot boom for the bolt rope. The outhaul has no block set-up, just a straight pull and tie off line.
So, if I choose the loose foot, what mods am I facing to make it all work properly and efficiently ??.
I don't race, I cruise, primarily recreational day sailing. I enjoy tweaking a bit more out of any sailboat, but do not care to make extensive mods to my rig if the attached foot arrangement is adequate for my sailing style and the loose foot only adds an imperceptible improvement to performance.
What say all of you experts? I thank you all again for any advice offered!
*Jeff Johnston+* Mol?n labe!
------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:48:17 -0400 (EDT) From: wcampion@aol.com To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Outhaul Message-ID: <8CEE0BB658A9F24-1E5C-A474@webmail-m079.sysops.aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Jeff, I can't tell you if it's the 'proper' distance, but I can tell you, it's the exact setup on my M-15 #201. Skip M-15 1982 #201 M-10 1974 #177 -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Johnston <frjeff@gmail.com> To: montgomery_boats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Wed, Apr 4, 2012 4:25 pm Subject: M_Boats: Outhaul Picture attached is of the clew of my main and outhaul. This is on my Monty 5. Does this look like the proper distance for my bolt rope attached main? Jeff+* ol?n labe! ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:00:38 -0500 From: Jeffrey Johnston <frjeff@gmail.com> To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Outhaul Message-ID: <CAFS5qAtJwkHTQahDqBEA6azr_R=0xypj+-mrZDoHcmZC-wTGzw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks Skip. My M15 is a 1981 (176) Jeff On Apr 4, 2012 4:48 PM, <wcampion@aol.com> wrote:
Jeff,
I can't tell you if it's the 'proper' distance, but I can tell you, it's the exact setup on my M-15 #201.
Skip M-15 1982 #201 M-10 1974 #177
-----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Johnston <frjeff@gmail.com> To: montgomery_boats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Wed, Apr 4, 2012 4:25 pm Subject: M_Boats: Outhaul
Picture attached is of the clew of my main and outhaul. This is on my Monty 5. Does this look like the proper distance for my bolt rope attached main?
Jeff+* ol?n labe!
------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:49:45 -0400 From: Rick Davies <jdavies104@gmail.com> To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: M_Boats: Loose Foot vs Bolt Rope Foot Message-ID: <CA+0OvVhxyJmYTbhTGUV=STNh7T-DCC3X_=bWR0cr6Xe9Fi78aA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks, Bill, that all makes a lot of sense. I also drysail, but had not thought of leaving the sail on all season. It's certainly quicker getting into the water if the sail's already on the boom. I can't leave the boom mounted since I have mid-boom sheeting and keep the boat covered when not in the water. I'll have to practice flaking and tieing. Rick M17 #633 Lynne L On Wednesday, April 4, 2012, Bill Wickett <billwick@gmail.com> wrote:
Rick,
Easy answer - don't detach the outhaul or the mainsail, all season long. If you rig everytime you sail, leave your main on the boom, flaked and tied. Stow it in the cabin like that. One less thing to do when rigging or tearing down. We mostly drysail from yard, launching each time, and leave the boat completely rigged including a sailcover over the main,and the jib of the day in a sail bag at the bow. When we do travel, we leave the main on the boom.
Put the sail on the boom, run the outhaul line through the clew, with a figure 8 knot through the padeye. If you do want to take off the sail each time, you will have to look for a small snap hook. Small enough to pull through the clew cringle (eye). Or tie in a knot each time.
My loose footed main has a 3" long metalslug at the clew in the sail groove. It slides pretty well with a yearly waxing. If I didn't have that, guess I would have a strap through the clew cringle and around the boom.
When we do stow the boom with sail, we leave the topping lift attached, until the boom is in the cabin. Makes it a very easy job for the Admiral. One end is supported. Julie lifts the gooseneck out, steps down into the cabin and guides the boom in. Then she detaches the topping lift. She hooks it up first thing when we start rigging again.
Bill Wickett Makin' Time M17 #622
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Rick Davies <jdavies104@gmail.com> wrote:
Bill,
In the Harken 4:1 external, how is the clew connected? In the diagram both ends of the line are dead-ended - one end to the eyestrap and the other to the moving block. It appears to pass through the clew cringle. But then the clew would not be detachable. What obvious point am I missing?
Rick M-17 #633 Lynne L
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012, Bill Wickett <billwick@gmail.com> wrote:
Not to hard to make an outhaul. Can be as simple as a cheek block and a cleat. The block would be at the aft end of the boom, to turn the outhaul line so it can be cleated farther up the boom. We have an 1-1/8" diameter block there. Mounted as far aft as possible, just beside the groove. I think it is a Harken #092 Bullet Block. Could also use a slightly larger diameter 1 1/2" Harken #132. Both use #10 machine screws. You will have to drill the boom 2 x and then tap the hole. You can get a #10 tap at auto parts store. Mount a 3" horn cleat or a small cam cleat about 12" forward from that. Again, drill and tap for the screws. Bed the hardware with Lifecaulk, or 4200.
If you want to have a bit more mechanical advantage 4:1, use a second single block on a second line from a small padeye to the cleat.
Hard to write it out. Go here to see the picture http://www.harken.com/rigtips/Outhaul.php
Even cruising, having the control of the foot makes a difference. Doesn't take much tweaking to get more power.
Bill Wickett Makin' Time M17 #622
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jeffrey Johnston <frjeff@gmail.com> wrote:
As I am ready to order new sails for My Monty 15, I have been reading everything I can about sail configuration for this boat and listening to much advice herein. Many indicate that I should go with a loose footed main (presumably, giving far better sail shape control).
However, I have recently read somewhere that it takes some modification/additions to the outhaul to effectively use the loose footed style. I believe the reference was to some sort of block arrangement to give greater purchase when tightening the foot.
My rig is the old standard with a track/slot boom for the bolt rope. The outhaul has no block set-up, just a straight pull and tie off line.
So, if I choose the loose foot, what mods am I facing to make it all work properly and efficiently ??.
I don't race, I cruise, primarily recreational day sailing. I enjoy tweaking a bit more out of any sailboat, but do not care to make extensive mods to my rig if the attached foot arrangement is adequate for my sailing style and the loose foot only adds an imperceptible improvement to performance.
What say all of you experts? I thank you all again for any advice offered!
*Jeff Johnston+* Mol?n labe!
------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:14:37 -0400 From: Bill Wickett <billwick@gmail.com> To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Loose Foot vs Bolt Rope Foot Message-ID: <CAFd5cDnvu3_BuD1VitjZ4N6b=psbx9bU4WjkG8O8kJ7eVT2WWQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Rick, We have the Sailor's Tailor boat cover on when in the drysail yard. The lower end of the main sheet is connected to the traveller with a snap shackle. So that releases and we wrap that around the sail, then the sail cover goes on. End of the boom gets tied to the back stay. The boat cover has 2 loops over the cockpit area that we tie up over the boom. This also helps to keep the sail cover in place. Everything is pretty stable and has been through numerous T-storms with no ill effects. Bill On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Rick Davies <jdavies104@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, Bill, that all makes a lot of sense. I also drysail, but had not thought of leaving the sail on all season. It's certainly quicker getting into the water if the sail's already on the boom. I can't leave the boom mounted since I have mid-boom sheeting and keep the boat covered when not in the water. I'll have to practice flaking and tieing.
Rick M17 #633 Lynne L
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012, Bill Wickett <billwick@gmail.com> wrote:
Rick,
Easy answer - don't detach the outhaul or the mainsail, all season long. If you rig everytime you sail, leave your main on the boom, flaked and tied. Stow it in the cabin like that. One less thing to do when rigging or tearing down. We mostly drysail from yard, launching each time, and leave the boat completely rigged including a sailcover over the main,and the jib of the day in a sail bag at the bow. When we do travel, we leave the main on the boom.
Put the sail on the boom, run the outhaul line through the clew, with a figure 8 knot through the padeye. If you do want to take off the sail each time, you will have to look for a small snap hook. Small enough to pull through the clew cringle (eye). Or tie in a knot each time.
My loose footed main has a 3" long metalslug at the clew in the sail groove. It slides pretty well with a yearly waxing. If I didn't have that, guess I would have a strap through the clew cringle and around the boom.
When we do stow the boom with sail, we leave the topping lift attached, until the boom is in the cabin. Makes it a very easy job for the Admiral. One end is supported. Julie lifts the gooseneck out, steps down into the cabin and guides the boom in. Then she detaches the topping lift. She hooks it up first thing when we start rigging again.
Bill Wickett Makin' Time M17 #622
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Rick Davies <jdavies104@gmail.com> wrote:
Bill,
In the Harken 4:1 external, how is the clew connected? In the diagram both ends of the line are dead-ended - one end to the eyestrap and the other to the moving block. It appears to pass through the clew cringle. But then the clew would not be detachable. What obvious point am I missing?
Rick M-17 #633 Lynne L
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012, Bill Wickett <billwick@gmail.com> wrote:
Not to hard to make an outhaul. Can be as simple as a cheek block and a cleat. The block would be at the aft end of the boom, to turn the outhaul line so it can be cleated farther up the boom. We have an 1-1/8" diameter block there. Mounted as far aft as possible, just beside the groove. I think it is a Harken #092 Bullet Block. Could also use a slightly larger diameter 1 1/2" Harken #132. Both use #10 machine screws. You will have to drill the boom 2 x and then tap the hole. You can get a #10 tap at auto parts store. Mount a 3" horn cleat or a small cam cleat about 12" forward from that. Again, drill and tap for the screws. Bed the hardware with Lifecaulk, or 4200.
If you want to have a bit more mechanical advantage 4:1, use a second single block on a second line from a small padeye to the cleat.
Hard to write it out. Go here to see the picture http://www.harken.com/rigtips/Outhaul.php
Even cruising, having the control of the foot makes a difference. Doesn't take much tweaking to get more power.
Bill Wickett Makin' Time M17 #622
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jeffrey Johnston <frjeff@gmail.com> wrote:
As I am ready to order new sails for My Monty 15, I have been reading everything I can about sail configuration for this boat and listening to much advice herein. Many indicate that I should go with a loose footed main (presumably, giving far better sail shape control).
However, I have recently read somewhere that it takes some modification/additions to the outhaul to effectively use the loose footed style. I believe the reference was to some sort of block arrangement to give greater purchase when tightening the foot.
My rig is the old standard with a track/slot boom for the bolt rope. The outhaul has no block set-up, just a straight pull and tie off line.
So, if I choose the loose foot, what mods am I facing to make it all work properly and efficiently ??.
I don't race, I cruise, primarily recreational day sailing. I enjoy tweaking a bit more out of any sailboat, but do not care to make extensive mods to my rig if the attached foot arrangement is adequate for my sailing style and the loose foot only adds an imperceptible improvement to performance.
What say all of you experts? I thank you all again for any advice offered!
*Jeff Johnston+* Mol?n labe!
------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:25:23 -0400 (EDT) From: GILASAILR@aol.com To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Loose Foot vs Bolt Rope Foot Message-ID: <715f6.3454e04d.3cae3263@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Fr. Jeff, No modifications are needed if you have a loose footed sail at the outhaul. Use a short piece of line tied through the clew grommet and around the boom with about one fingers width clearance to allow it to slide fore and aft. Or ask the sailmaker to install (you can do it yourself too) a slug at the clew. GO ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:02:10 -0400 From: "Joe Murphy" <seagray@embarqmail.com> To: "For and about Montgomery Sailboats" <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Pop rivets? Message-ID: <BAF5182D09F74D7BAB82BD0DFF543729@D72VSMG1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I've used both aluminum pop rivets and SS tapped bolts. I tend to use SS tapped in bolts for things that pull perpendicular or have a pretty good load, such as the boom vang. When I use SS against aluminum I coat the SS piece in TefGel. It forms the barrier needed to ward off the corrosion. So far, so good. I can definitely tell where I've used TefGel and where I forgot to use it. Joe SeaFrog M17 ----- Original Message ----- From: douglas kelch To: Montgomery Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:41 PM Subject: M_Boats: Pop rivets? I am curious about Tom's comment on stainless pop rivets. I used to use stainless self taping screws. Over 10 years of use, often in saltwater, they fused to the boom and were not easily removable and the resulting larger hole was not useable. I switched to aluminum pop rivets as thier strength seems to be well in excess of the need on small boats like ours. There does not seem to be any need or advantage to stainless pop rivets. Am I wrong here? Thanks Doug Kelch M15 G" #310 "Seas the Day" ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:02:32 -0700 From: Tom Smith <openboatt@gmail.com> To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Subject: Re: M_Boats: Responding to queries on the forum Message-ID: <CA+3pONKQEbEY0CO+M3eNv1hHo-L5fBWGVG9tZ2cCidOJhFyBig@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For guys your age, jerry, digest is much more important to young studs such as myself... t ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:25:33 -0400 (EDT) From: eisenee@aol.com To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Pop rivets? Message-ID: <8CEE0E22172285A-8C0-C694@webmail-m170.sysops.aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I have been using aluminum pop rivits on all my boats for the last 40 years and don't remember one ever failing. And if something is going to fail I would rather have the rivit break then to have a large hole torn into the boom or mast. Eldor M17 Motu iti -----Original Message----- From: douglas kelch <doug1kelch@gmail.com> To: Montgomery <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Wed, Apr 4, 2012 1:04 pm Subject: M_Boats: Pop rivets? I am curious about Tom's comment on stainless pop rivets. I used to use stainless self taping screws. Over 10 years of use, often in altwater, they fused to the boom and were not easily removable and the esulting larger hole was not useable. I switched to aluminum pop rivets as thier strength seems to be well in xcess of the need on small boats like ours. There does not seem to be any need or advantage to stainless pop rivets. Am I wrong here? Thanks Doug Kelch 15 G" #310 Seas the Day" ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:18:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "jslubliner@aol.com" <jslubliner@aol.com> To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Pop rivets? Message-ID: <8CEE0F1EE2174CA-1888-C1F5@webmail-m073.sysops.aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Early Mexico racing dirty trick #1: In the mid-70-s, When Jerry and Tom Van Atta would race Jerry's most current go-fast in Guaymas... I remember a race when Jerry and Tom were racing side by side with a guy named Neal Clark in another one of Jerry's boats. At one critical point in the dual, one of the "perps" threw a handful of broken pop rivets at the competitor's sail. As the broken pop rivets began to rain down on the deck and as the sailors realized what they were seeing, they became convinced that the rig was coming apart and broke off the competition to investigate. The offending boat then sped on ahead and won the race. This proves that there is always a good use for pop rivets - and that the race is not always to the swift, but sometimes to the crafty. John in Tucson. ---------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: eisenee <eisenee@aol.com> To: montgomery_boats <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Wed, Apr 4, 2012 6:26 pm Subject: Re: M_Boats: Pop rivets? I have been using aluminum pop rivits on all my boats for the last 40 years and don't remember one ever failing. And if something is going to fail I would rather have the rivit break then to have a large hole torn into the boom or mast. Eldor M17 Motu iti -----Original Message----- From: douglas kelch <doug1kelch@gmail.com> To: Montgomery <montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com> Sent: Wed, Apr 4, 2012 1:04 pm Subject: M_Boats: Pop rivets? I am curious about Tom's comment on stainless pop rivets. I used to use stainless self taping screws. Over 10 years of use, often in altwater, they fused to the boom and were not easily removable and the esulting larger hole was not useable. I switched to aluminum pop rivets as thier strength seems to be well in xcess of the need on small boats like ours. There does not seem to be any need or advantage to stainless pop rivets. Am I wrong here? Thanks Doug Kelch 15 G" #310 Seas the Day" ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:05:49 -0400 (EDT) From: GILASAILR@aol.com To: montgomery_boats@mailman.xmission.com Subject: Re: M_Boats: Pop rivets? Message-ID: <759ec.1ba1ae94.3cae57fd@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I have used alum until they fail, then stainless/monel rivets - and t-gel. Locate the rivet in this picture that fell out seconds after the picture was taken -say the secret woird - win a hundred dollars! GO -popping parts/fittings for fun.